Re: mdemo2-make.test on MinGW failure in libtool 2-0 and head.

2005-08-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Ekberg wrote on Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 11:41:22AM CEST: > > I have looked at the reason why the mdemo2-make.test fails > on MinGW. Very nice! > The reason is that the mlib_func symbol is not properly > exported from libmlib (i.e. not present in the import lib). > > I see two so

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 13:46 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 13:57 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > >> Hi all, > > > >> What method needs to be used to tell libtool to link to stdc++ that > >> belongs to the compiler being run? > >

RE: libtool ChangeLog [branch-2-0]

2005-08-03 Thread Peter Ekberg
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Peter Ekberg wrote on Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:18:18PM CEST: > > > > I came across a surprise in the commit script though. When > > commiting on branch-2-0, the script checked for conflicts > > against head, which forced me to --force one commit. > > > > Is this caused b

Re: libtool ChangeLog [branch-2-0]

2005-08-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Ekberg wrote on Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:18:18PM CEST: > > I came across a surprise in the commit script though. When > commiting on branch-2-0, the script checked for conflicts > against head, which forced me to --force one commit. > > Is this caused by an error in my routine?

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Graham Leggett
Christoph Bartoschek said: > I also have big problems that libtool tries to use /usr/lib/libstdc++ > instead of the compiler one, when I compile several projects. > > IMO libtool should always ignore libstdc++, but this is another issue. > > I solve the problem by patching libtool after configu

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 13:57 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Hi all, What method needs to be used to tell libtool to link to stdc++ that belongs to the compiler being run? No method at all. libstdc++ is an internal library of g++ you are not supposed to

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Albert Chin
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:30:39PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > > The link line generated by libtool is: > > /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -I.. -I../.. > -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib -lxml2 -lz > -lpthread -liconv -lm -lsocket -lnsl -o libm

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Graham Leggett
Christoph Bartoschek said: > I also have big problems that libtool tries to use /usr/lib/libstdc++ > instead of the compiler one, when I compile several projects. > > IMO libtool should always ignore libstdc++, but this is another issue. > > I solve the problem by patching libtool after configur

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Graham Leggett
Christoph Bartoschek said: > I also have big problems that libtool tries to use /usr/lib/libstdc++ > instead of the compiler one, when I compile several projects. > > IMO libtool should always ignore libstdc++, but this is another issue. > > I solve the problem by patching libtool after configur

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Christoph Bartoschek
Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2005 19:11 schrieb Graham Leggett: > Kurt Roeckx said: > > Are you sure your libtool has been regenerated for the new g++? > > I rebuilt libtool v1.5.8 which was previously installed, and when this > made no difference I downloaded and built libtool v1.5.18. > > I deleted con

Libtool 1.5.18: unpredicable linking to stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, While attempting to build two C++ library projects A and B, on a Solaris v2.8 environment with gcc v4.0.1 (in a private directory) and gcc v3.4.2 (in /usr/local) both installed in the path, and with gcc v4.0.1 taking precedance, libtool pulls in either the v3.4.2 stdc++, or the v4.0.1 stdc

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Graham Leggett
Peter O'Gorman said: > It could be coming from an already installed .la file. I did a complete machine grep. The only references to libstdc++ within an .la file on this machine are in libstdc++.la itself, or in the .la files of the two projects. libstdc++ is not found in any other .la file on th

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Graham Leggett wrote: | I am completely baffled - can anyone reveal what method libtool uses to | detect libraries? What steps are followed to create the dependency_libs | variable within the .la file? I am trying to find out where the referencce | t

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Graham Leggett
Kurt Roeckx said: > Are you sure your libtool has been regenerated for the new g++? I rebuilt libtool v1.5.8 which was previously installed, and when this made no difference I downloaded and built libtool v1.5.18. I deleted config.guess, config.sub, libtool and ltmain.sh and recreated them from

Re: unwanted moderation/spam measures

2005-08-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter O'Gorman wrote: | Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | | | | Regards, and sorry for the inconvenience, | | I have posted recently and had my mail queued for moderator approval. | Not happy. Okay, this one came through, improving my mood :) Peter -BE

Re: unwanted moderation/spam measures

2005-08-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | Just a short heads-up for people who have posted recently: | | In an attempt to improve upon the spam situation, I've probably messed | up mailman filtering rules to the extent that currently, everyone is | moderated. Please

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been having a very strange problem that I have tracked down to > libtool, and I don't know how to proceed. > > I have a Solaris v2.8 machine with a system installed copy of gcc v3.4.2 > in /usr/local. Recently a

RE: unwanted moderation/spam measures

2005-08-03 Thread Ian Roxborough
Would it be possible to configure mailman so that only messages from addresses which are not registered get moderated? Might be less work for the moderator(s) and only senders which are not subscribers would be inconvenienced (still not great, but a little better). Cheers, Ian. -Original

unwanted moderation/spam measures

2005-08-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Just a short heads-up for people who have posted recently: In an attempt to improve upon the spam situation, I've probably messed up mailman filtering rules to the extent that currently, everyone is moderated. Please excuse this unwanted annoyance and a couple more[*] which may turn up in the fol

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 13:57 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > What method needs to be used to tell libtool to link to stdc++ that > belongs to the compiler being run? No method at all. libstdc++ is an internal library of g++ you are not supposed to specify explicitly. The issue you describ

Re: libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Graham Leggett
Graham Leggett said: > What method needs to be used to tell libtool to link to stdc++ that > belongs to the compiler being run? As was pointed out in a followup message (I deleted the message by accident, sorry!), it should not be necessary to explicitly link to the stdc++ library, however libtoo

libtool/ltmain.sh pulling in wrong stdc++

2005-08-03 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, I have been having a very strange problem that I have tracked down to libtool, and I don't know how to proceed. I have a Solaris v2.8 machine with a system installed copy of gcc v3.4.2 in /usr/local. Recently a private copy of gcc v4.0.1 was installed in a private directory. The private d

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

2005-08-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Steve, * Steve Langasek wrote on Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:37:18AM CEST: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > There were also a couple of bug reports related to Debian having > > link_all_deplibs=no, but the user expecting otherwise. > > For example, if you w

Re: linking of indirect dependencies (dependency_libs) on Linux

2005-08-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Steve Langasek wrote on Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 02:01:35PM CEST: > > Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last > > week, > I've been away, sorry for the late response. Ok, no worries. :) > > On T