On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 05:41:32PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> Well, I can at least point you to much much more discussion about the
> general issue. Alas, other (libtool and non-libtool related) work has
> kept at least me from progressing in this regard. Also, the newer GNU
> ld switches
Hi Steve,
* Steve Langasek wrote on Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 02:01:35PM CEST:
>
> Is there no one out there who can answer this question from my mail of last
> week,
I've been away, sorry for the late response.
> or was the message simply drowned out in the flood of spam on the
> list? :)
We are _
Hi Jeremie,
Sorry for the late response, I've been away.
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:23:06PM CEST:
>
> I began to read the documentation (from HEAD) again to make it clearer.
> Here are a few notes :
>
> * Section 3.1 ``Creating object file'' :
> << Since this is a lib
Matthew Landauer wrote:
Thanks for that! That's a really good workaround. I'm productive again! :-)
Maybe I'm misunderstanding things but shouldn't libtool understand "-F"?
It knows how to interpret -framework and -F goes with that as much as -L
goes along with -l for normal linking.
Most pe
It's for linking against the SDK for Apple's Shake (2d compositing
package) which by default puts its frameworks in
/Applications/Shake/sdk/Frameworks (for Shake version 4) or
/Applications/Shake3.50/sdk/Frameworks (for Shake version 3.5).
Matthew
Matthew Landauer wrote:
Thanks for that! Th
* Gleb Natapov wrote on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:58:03PM CEST:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:42:17PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Gleb Natapov wrote on Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:39:34AM CEST:
> > >
> > > I have library (lets say liba.so) that on startup checks available
> > > hardware and load
