Hi Peter,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:29:57PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>In case anyone is wondering (Gary) why HEAD fails one of the new tests on
> >>Mac OS X 10.4, it is because of a bug in the linker. I have reported the
> >>bug and it is unlikely to be fixed bef
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
In case anyone is wondering (Gary) why HEAD fails one of the new tests on
Mac OS X 10.4, it is because of a bug in the linker. I have reported the
bug and it is unlikely to be fixed before Mac OS X 10.5, I think.
Which one fails, and how? Just so we can distinguish it
Hi Peter,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:45:12PM CEST:
> Hi,
> In case anyone is wondering (Gary) why HEAD fails one of the new tests on
> Mac OS X 10.4, it is because of a bug in the linker. I have reported the
> bug and it is unlikely to be fixed before Mac OS X 10.5, I thin
Hi,
In case anyone is wondering (Gary) why HEAD fails one of the new tests on
Mac OS X 10.4, it is because of a bug in the linker. I have reported the bug
and it is unlikely to be fixed before Mac OS X 10.5, I think.
There is a pretty good workaround though, set the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET
e
There is this free date site filled with tons of sexoholics.
No flowers, no walks-on-the-beach, just meet up for sex :)
There are also a few who want serious relationships though
So if you want a long-termer, or a one-nighter, you got it ;)
Whatever floats your boat pretty much!
http://www.fuc
