Re: shared library depending on static library on Solaris

2005-06-10 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:34:41AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Sven, > > I am very sorry it took me so long to look at this. Thanks for looking into this. > > Is there a problem with my assumptions or with libtool ? > > This is a bug in libtool, I believe. > deplibs_check_method may not

Re: shared library depending on static library on Solaris

2005-06-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Sven, * Sven Verdoolaege wrote on Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 06:31:29PM CEST: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:34:41AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Is there a problem with my assumptions or with libtool ? > > > > This is a bug in libtool, I believe. > > deplibs_check_method may not be pass_all

Re: Fortran 90/95 (FC) support

2005-06-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:24:00AM CEST: > > - `ifort -static' is falsely detected as broken, because it shows > link-warnings. To put this into perspective: | $ cat a.f | program foo | end | $ ifort -static -blabla -o a a.f | ifort: Command line warning: i

Problem with exporting local symbols

2005-06-10 Thread Ralf Hoffmann
Hi, I have a problem about symbol collisions in shared librarys. I currently porting the build process of a shared library to libtool and the build itself works so far. The library uses a modified zlib implementation so the final library contains zlib symbols. In the old build process the linker w