Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool...

2005-05-15 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Bill Northcott wrote: Possibly, the last line could equally be: install_name libfoo.2.dylib compatibility_version 3.0.0 current_version 3.2.15 That would have the same effect on Darwin, if applied consistently. The encoded current_version is for informational purposes only, nothing uses it, com

Re: totally confused by versioning system of libtool...

2005-05-15 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Bill Northcott wrote: I have so far only found one GNU libtool packages which correctly versions its libraries on MacOS X. This is R and they seem to do it with code in Makefile.in which overrides the libtool versioning. Looks like R builds a framework on darwin and uses install_name_tool to

this is the future

2005-05-15 Thread Kirby Short
Want to be amaz-ing in bed? lasti-ng super long? now you can! http://liverymen.com/et/?special this is a non-horm0nal treat-ment 100% saf-e and ef-fective! no: http://liverymen.com/rm.php?special ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool