On branch-1-5, the following change was checked in 2004/12/28:
revision 1.334.2.45
date: 2004/12/28 12:39:15; author: rwild; state: Exp; lines: +18 -14
* ltmain.in: New variable quote_scanset to work around SunOS ksh
`case' backslash-escaping bug: protect character class by variable
ex
On 15/05/2005, at 12:55 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| How should libtool versioning be used so as to support both the
MacOS
| X/Darwin scheme and the Linux ELF way of doing things? Is this
| possible, or should one write specific makefile routines to adjust
| version numbers at install time?
Mac
Title:
How
to call for free!
Como llamar gratis!
Comment appelé gratuitement!
Как
звонить
бесплатно!
NEW WAY CALLS
Make FREE Mobile
Phone Calls with Cellwireless Telecommunication
when you help your Family and Friends SAVE on
their mobile calls!
Best regards
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:14:14PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> Moreoever, libtool.m4 has (from the 2.0 branch):
> # Append ld.so.conf contents to the search path
> if test -f /etc/ld.so.conf; then
> lt_ld_extra=`awk '/^include / { system(sprintf("cd /etc; cat %s",
> \[$]2)); skip = 1; } {
RHEL [34]/amd64 has /lib64, /usr/lib64, /lib, and /lib64. How do we
convince libtool to search /lib64, /usr/lib64 first? Unfortunately,
the output of gcc --print-search-dirs is:
libraries:
=/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/:/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.2.3/:/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_6
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Ed Hartnett wrote:
In the case of shared library versions, what about the header file?
Most libraries (including the one I am converting to libtool) have a
header file that is installed along with the library.
Although the versioning scheme is very clever about letting me have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Northcott wrote:
| How should libtool versioning be used so as to support both the MacOS
| X/Darwin scheme and the Linux ELF way of doing things? Is this
| possible, or should one write specific makefile routines to adjust
| version numbers at ins
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:28:10AM -0600, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> In the case of shared library versions, what about the header file?
>
> Most libraries (including the one I am converting to libtool) have a
> header file that is installed along with the library.
>
> Although the versioning scheme is
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005, Ed Hartnett wrote:
>>
>> How does the version number get used in this situation? That is, is
>> there any time on the users machine that the linker notices that he is
>> now linking to 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.0?
>
> Yes, the linker no
Want to be amaz-ing in bed? lasti-ng super long?
now you can!
http://liverymen.com/et/?special
this is a non-horm0nal treat-ment 100% saf-e and ef-fective!
no: http://liverymen.com/rm.php?special
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
10 matches
Mail list logo
