Re: functions under MinGW

2005-03-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Bob Friesenhahn writes: > Yes, I am talking about building using MSYS. Not just *using* MSYS (i.e. using MSYS's shell, sed, m4, awk etc), but *for* MSYS, right? Targetting MSYS is not something one would commonly do, is it? The whole point of MSYS is that it is a runtime used by development tools

Re: functions under MinGW

2005-03-16 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Bob Friesenhahn writes: > It turns out that the related functionality provided with > MinGW is hoisted from Cygwin. As such, it has GPL restrictions. Errr, certainly not. Maybe you are thinking of the dirent implementation in MSYS? MSYS *is* a fork of Cyg

functions under MinGW

2005-03-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Bob Friesenhahn writes: > It turns out that the related functionality provided with > MinGW is hoisted from Cygwin. As such, it has GPL restrictions. Errr, certainly not. Maybe you are thinking of the dirent implementation in MSYS? MSYS *is* a fork of Cygwin. MSYS is an environment for a conf

functions under MinGW

2005-03-16 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
It turns out that the related functionality provided with MinGW is hoisted from Cygwin. As such, it has GPL restrictions. Libtool is not using its own replacement functionality if functions like opendir() are already present. The end result is that the final product is GPL rather than LGPL

KINSHASA : PROMOTION TRACTAFRIC MITSUBISHI L200

2005-03-16 Thread Kin.Mailing
Si ce message n'apparaît pas correctement, cliquez ici.     Pour pouvoir lire cette « Information Promotionnelle » en toute sécurité, veuillez cliquer sur le lien ci-dessous :

PROMOTION FÊTE DE PÂQUES WIMBI DIRA AIRWAYS

2005-03-16 Thread Kin.Mailing
Si ce message n'apparaît pas correctement, cliquez ici.     Pour pouvoir lire cette « Information Promotionnelle » en toute sécurité, veuillez cliquer sur le lien ci-dessous :

Re: support PIE executables?

2005-03-16 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf! Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Would it be worthwhile for Libtool to support building > position-independent executables (PIE) on platforms that support it? > > With the surge of security-related features that use PIE, and all the > knowledge Libtool already has integrated, this should be f

support PIE executables?

2005-03-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Would it be worthwhile for Libtool to support building position-independent executables (PIE) on platforms that support it? With the surge of security-related features that use PIE, and all the knowledge Libtool already has integrated, this should be fairly painless and might prove helpful, I thin

Re: Speeding up libtool

2005-03-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Max, * Max Bowsher wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:14:42PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >for your projects. For best results on Cygwin, you should probably > >configure (with libtool HEAD) like > > CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/ash lt_ECHO='printf %s' /bin/ash configure [...] Oh dear. This should b

Re: PGI and C++ templates

2005-03-16 Thread Markus Christen
hi Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Sorry for the self-reply, * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:49:00PM CET: This is a status update on "libtool/pgi/C++ with templates". Now here's an improved patch against branch-2-0. Should work for both static and shared uninstalled libraries plu