hardcode_direct et. al.

2004-09-10 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Libtoolers, I see that we have developed a test failure in demo-hardcode.test on linux, which seems to be down to the hardcoded value from libtool.m4 disagreeing with the probed value from demos-hardcode.test. It seems to me that we should be probing fr

未承諾広告※

2004-09-10 Thread 無料で紹介します。
$B!c;v6HTEL:0736$B!J(B64$B!K(B6132 (B $B$4ITMW$JJ}$O!"(B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] $B$K%a!<%k%"%I%l%9$rAw?.$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B $B"!"!"!"!"!"!"!!X(BYY-NET$B!Y2q0w@)$40FFb"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!(B (B $B3N$+$J=P0)$$$r$*LsB+$$$?$7$^$9!#(B $BAO6H#3#9G/$NEAE}$H<[EMAIL PROTECTED]"$k2q$K9g$C

sugper viagrga

2004-09-10 Thread Ronnie Cantrell
I am truly enjoying my rebirth. No more excuses, no more frustration, no more having to solely satisfy my girlfriend orally. I just pop 10 mg, and before long, I am a sex machine. Now that I can get rock-hard again, my girlfriend can enjoy her favorite position: being on top, which is difficult fo

Re: compile problem

2004-09-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: If the compile script is unnecessarily used, then compilation will be even slower. This seems particularly true for the Windows operating system where compilation using libtool already feels like compiling in molasses. It seems that Windows is very slow

Re: compile problem

2004-09-10 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > >> >> Okay. But for a project built with `make -j', we still need >> AM_PROG_CC_C_O >> and _LT_COMPILER_C_O to understand each others' locks :-( >> >>> [...] >>> >>> Gary> Meant to ask, why doesn't AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE (condition

Re: compile problem

2004-09-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Okay. But for a project built with `make -j', we still need AM_PROG_CC_C_O and _LT_COMPILER_C_O to understand each others' locks :-( [...] Gary> Meant to ask, why doesn't AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE (conditionally if Gary> necessary) simply invoke AM_PROG_CC_C_O?

Re: compile problem

2004-09-10 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > Gary> So does that simply mean that libtool objects can be correctly built > Gary> as subdir-objects without AM_PROG_CC_C_O? Sorry to bug you, just > Gary> making sure I understand why you made

[99]security warning![06]

2004-09-10 Thread Willis Ho
Put an end to unwanted spam, popups and other internet security hazards PERMANENTLY more info here... ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool