Re: compile problem

>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Gary> So does that simply mean that libtool objects can be correctly built Gary> as subdir-objects without AM_PROG_CC_C_O? Sorry to bug you, just Gary> making sure I understand why you made the patch the way you did... The purpos

Re: libltdl & Automake improvements

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Gary V.Vaughan wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8 Sep 2004, at 00:05, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: It seems a shame that non-recursive packages must become recursive in order to build libltdl. Using Automake includes, Automake conditionals, and well-defined c

Re: libltdl & Automake improvements

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8 Sep 2004, at 00:05, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: It seems a shame that non-recursive packages must become recursive in order to build libltdl. Using Automake includes, Automake conditionals, and well-defined conventions, libltdl's Makefile.am could s

libltdl & Automake improvements

Libtool 2.0 (in development) provides a libltdl build scheme which is intended to be integrated into the dependent package's configure/build rather than providing a separate configure script. In this scheme "libltdl/Makefile" is added to the package's configure.ac AC_OUTPUT statement and the A

Re: compile problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salut Alexandre! Welcome back. Hope you enjoyed your vacation :-) On 7 Sep 2004, at 22:03, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: I just tri

Re: compile problem

>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: >>> I just tried to build cvs libtool with cvs auto* all from today, and get: make all-recursive Making all in . >>> cd . && /bin/ksh /us

PATCH: PR/17311: Wrong libgcc_s.so.1 is used by lt-gij

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 03:12:59PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 01:51:34PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > The newly built libgcc_s.so.1 may not be used for "make check". It > > leads to 2 problems: > > > > 1. The newly built libgcc_s.so.1 may be fully tested by "make check". > > 2.

Install test failures (Harcode/tagdemo-exec) on OpenBSD3.5

Hi folks, I'm trying to install libtool 1.5.8 on a machine I'm setting up. As with everything at the moment, libtool is giving me problems. 3 test are failing at make check (I also tried gmake as a couple of other apps have had problems with BSD make but no difference). First one is hardcode.tes