On Dec 3, 2003, Mohan Embar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wanted to see how much faster the libgcj build would go if I took
> libtool out of the picture for some of the pieces.
I'm not all that surprised your C program is much faster that the
shell script. For starters, it fails to support all
Libtool 1.5 seems like it currently requires a F77 compiler, but I'm
trying to build on Darwin with Apple's gcc. For now I can gladly use
Paolo's backport of AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS. Thanks!
Is there a plan to release an interim 1.5.1 libtool version with this
patch, or is 1.6 coming out soon?
Regardi
RIC SIE
Tel (408)482-2840[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OBJECTIVE:
STRUCTURAL & MECHANICAL DESIGNER
CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL, TRANSPORTATION
CAD Operator
EXPERIENCE:
93 - present
DESIGNER, ENGINEER, CAD MANAGER; "Mech-Tronic"
Engineering & Design Service, Pr
I am using the attached macro as a backport of AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS to
libtool 1.5.
Paolo
# backported from libtool 1.6 by Paolo Bonzini
# When AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS is used, I redefine _LT_AC_TAGCONFIG
# to be more similar to the libtool 1.6 implementation, which
# uses an m4 loop and m4 case instead of a
> I seem to recall that libtool used to define something when compiling
> a shared library, but that this support was removed. Presumably this
> was because there was some other way to accomplish the same thing.
>
> Does anyone know of a way to get libtool to behave the way I need?
You may add som
