Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Albert" == Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Albert> I don't have a problem requiring AC_PROG_CXX, AC_PROG_F77, or Albert> AM_PROG_GCJ before AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. Anyone see this as a problem? As a user I wouldn't care about this little inconvenience if it allows Libtool not to bl

Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Earnie Boyd
Albert Chin wrote: I don't have a problem requiring AC_PROG_CXX, AC_PROG_F77, or AM_PROG_GCJ before AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. Anyone see this as a problem? Reading through the thread, AC_REQUIRE kept coming to my mind, so no I don't see a problem. Earnie. ___

Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Albert Chin
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:08:17AM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "Albert" == Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Albert> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:06:42PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Albert Chin wrote: > >> > >> > It's really annoying to have 1.5

Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Albert" == Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Albert> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:06:42PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Albert Chin wrote: >> >> > It's really annoying to have 1.5 automatically generate the C++ and >> > F77 tags. I'm trying to figure out why i

Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Albert Chin wrote: > > It's really annoying to have 1.5 automatically generate the C++ and > > F77 tags. I'm trying to figure out why it does this. > > does "generate the C++ and F77 tags" mean "care whether or not the C++ > preprocessor is acceptable?" >

Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Albert Chin
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 06:17:58PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Albert Chin wrote: > >It's really annoying to have 1.5 automatically generate the C++ and > >F77 tags. I'm trying to figure out why it does this. > > does "generate the C++ and F77 tags" mean "care whether or not the C++ > preprocess

Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Albert Chin
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:06:42PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Albert Chin wrote: > > > It's really annoying to have 1.5 automatically generate the C++ and > > F77 tags. I'm trying to figure out why it does this. We have the > > following in libtool.m4: > > dnl If AC_PROG

Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
Albert Chin wrote: It's really annoying to have 1.5 automatically generate the C++ and F77 tags. I'm trying to figure out why it does this. does "generate the C++ and F77 tags" mean "care whether or not the C++ preprocessor is acceptable?" the latest Apache source tarball was prepared with libtoo

Re: 1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Albert Chin wrote: > It's really annoying to have 1.5 automatically generate the C++ and > F77 tags. I'm trying to figure out why it does this. We have the > following in libtool.m4: > dnl If AC_PROG_CXX has already been expanded, run AC_LIBTOOL_CXX > dnl immediately, other

system libname.la vs local libname.a

2003-06-03 Thread The HighHat
Using libtool and automake to build statically linked executable from multiple convencience libs on linux that has both gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.2 installed There are several prebuild libraries that must get linked into the final executable as well. Let's call one of them libname.a There is a "

1.5 automatically generating C++, F77 tags

2003-06-03 Thread Albert Chin
It's really annoying to have 1.5 automatically generate the C++ and F77 tags. I'm trying to figure out why it does this. We have the following in libtool.m4: dnl If AC_PROG_CXX has already been expanded, run AC_LIBTOOL_CXX dnl immediately, otherwise, hook it in at the end of AC_PROG_CXX. AC