Ok, here it is. This patch changes AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC
so that it only appends -DPIC to the default "C" tag and the CXX
tag for C++. I would also like to deprecate -DPIC in the 1.5 release
to make it clear we intend to do away with it. I would also like
to ask anyone who does depend on
Robert,
> I think you can ignore inline assembler for anything other than
> C (including C++). I've never thought about it, but inline assembler
> in Fortran code sounds truly frightening! Anyway, if it was so
> important, why doesn't the compiler define it for you?
Current gcc defines __PIC__
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
Simon,
I think you can ignore inline assembler for anything other than
C (including C++). I've never thought about it, but inline assembler
in Fortran code sounds truly frightening! Anyway, if it was so
important, why doesn't the
Robert,
> Ok then, I'll see if I can make "-DPIC" into
> a conditionally-set thing that would be set to "" for anything
> but C and C++. Can we agree on that? ;)
Yes, although it would be nice if the other languages also had a way of
knowing they should emit PIC, at least if they allow condition
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
Ok then, I'll see if I can make "-DPIC" into
a conditionally-set thing that would be set to "" for anything
but C and C++. Can we agree on that? ;)
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Simon Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi,
> Good point, we never really resolved this issue.
> All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say "I"!
I'm against it.
If you have optimized assembler versions of some code for some platforms
(like the STL has, for example) and some of that code is not PIC, it is
a good idea to enclose it i
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:23:33PM -0500, Boehne, Robert wrote:
> Good point, we never really resolved this issue.
> All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say "I"!
WE :)
> Robert
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert Chin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
Albert,
Good point, we never really resolved this issue.
All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say "I"!
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Albert Chin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:11 PM
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:22:15PM -0500, Boehne, Robert wrote:
> I will look into this, but FYI, -DPIC should not be passed when
> compiling Fortran.
Why should -DPIC be passed at all for any compiler?
> Thanks,
>
> Robert
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Title: RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran)
Steve,
I will look into this, but FYI, -DPIC should not be passed when
compiling Fortran.
Thanks,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Steve Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL
How about getting paid to shop
please check out this great new program!
>Click here to find out more information!
<
__
I have just run into problems trying to use libtool on a
rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 system to build a library written in Fortran with
the IBM compiler xlf/xlf90.
There is an immediate compilation failure stating:
xlf90: 1501-210 command option P contains an incorrect subargument
libtool appears to in
12 matches
Mail list logo