Akim Demaille wrote:
> I don't agree. Autoconf does not use shell functions, it just says it
> will some day. If you want to use shell functions, don't do it
> pretending Autoconf did first :)
>
> Also, Autoconf will try to find a shell that supports functions.
Someone made the assertion that t
Tom Lord wrote:
> Finally, I still wish that a side-effect of the libtool effort was a
> document/database that explained clearly and concisely how to deal
> with shared libraries in various environments. As it stands, that
> information is weaved into convoluted code and the situation is
> glos
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 11:36 AM, Bruce Korb wrote:
You're specifically adding -L/sw/lib. Don't.
It will get added by the configure script in the
right place automatically, as long as /sw/bin/guile-config
and xml2-config are properly found with the PATH variable.
Gotcha.
Removing
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 08:39 AM, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
David, could you explain where `-L../autoopts/.libs -lopts' comes
from?
Sure.
Here are my original libtool link and compiler link commands:
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -L/sw/lib -o autogen
autogen-opts.o
The next release of libtool does not use 'ltconfig'. You might want
to check libtool out of CVS and see what changes need to be made (if
any).
Bob
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Jonathan Schilling wrote:
> To the libtool maintainers,
>
> A change needs to be made to the generation of ltconfig in order fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let
them install BASH and get out of our way. Both of them.
Bash uses configure.
And so does ash :-( which was my first thought for working around this
problem. On the other hand, is it so terrible to ask that those who
wish to continue using systems with 20-ye
> Let them install BASH and get out of our way.
As someone else pointed out, bash uses autoconf.
Also, while its good to talk about bringing up GNU environments on top
of proprietary ones, the long term view is to also think about
bringing them up on raw iron.
So, pick a small set of pr
To the libtool maintainers,
A change needs to be made to the generation of ltconfig in order for
it to build correctly on SCO OpenServer when using the SCO UDK development
kit (which is a different [more advanced] development kit than the "regular"
one that comes with OpenServer).
The change
> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> All, Hey, that's a relief, now we don't have to deal with this
Robert> issue anymore. I would be in favor of a) leaving the shell
Robert> functions in place, and b) making use of them more.
I don't agree. Autoconf does not use
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -L/sw/lib -o autogen \
> >> -export-dynamic -lguile *.o -L/sw/lib -lguile -lm \
> >> -L../autoopts/.libs -lopts -ldl
> >> ld: Undefined symbols:
> >> _aopts_alloc
> >> _aopts_realloc
> >> _aopts_strdup
> >> make[1
The Autoconf team -- Akim, Alexandre, Jim, Paul, and Tom -- is happy
to annonce the birth of Autoconf 2.55. Download, compile, install,
torture, and enjoy!
- Why should I upgrade from 2.54?
A few bug fixes, improved portability, no known incompatibility with
2.54 and 2.55, forthcoming Gettex
>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -L/sw/lib -o autogen \
>> >> -export-dynamic -lguile *.o -L/sw/lib -lguile -lm \
>> >> -L../autoopts/.libs -lopts -ldl
>> >> ld: Undefined symbols:
>> >
David Bacher wrote:
There's the problem:
> Configure parameters:
> CPPFLAGS=-I/sw/include
> LDFLAGS=-L/sw/lib
> --prefix=/sw
> --enable-snprintfv-install
> --mandir=/sw/share/man
> --infodir=/sw/share/info
You're specifically adding -L/sw/lib. Don't.
It will get added by the configure script in
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:53:42AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> > I don't agree. Autoconf does not use shell functions, it just says it
> > will some day. If you want to use shell functions, don't do it
> > pretending Autoconf did first :)
> >
> > Also, Autoconf will try to
>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> David Bacher wrote:
[...]
>> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -L/sw/lib -o autogen \
>> -export-dynamic -lguile *.o -L/sw/lib -lguile -lm \
>> -L../autoopts/.libs -lopts -ldl
>> ld: Undefined symbols:
>> _aopts_alloc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bash uses configure.
Bootstrap-Bash could use a frozen version of configure.
There certainly won't be any additions to the list of
systems with 15+ year old shells, so a bootstrap-bash
for hobbyists should work just fine.
__
16 matches
Mail list logo
