Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:3DAC41A9.3070503@;yahoo.com:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>>
>> If libtool was intended to be an extension of Autoconf/Automake, then
>> it should certainly have been absorbed into Automake, and not exist as
>> a stand-alone utility at all.
>>
>
> Do y
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0210151350390.21156-20@;scooby.simplesystems.org:
> The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
> (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
> consists of contributions from Elizabet
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Soren A wrote:
> >
> > Do you have examples of libtool use without autoconf and/or automake?
> > Why does libtool.m4 get installed into share/aclocal/? AFAIK, libtool
> > without autoconf/automake doesn't exist.
>
> Echo. I don't dispute that Bob might be correct but TTBOMK th
Soren A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Echo. I don't dispute that Bob might be correct but TTBOMK this is not
> _common_ knowledge. After extensively messing around with building a
> libtool from GNU cvs within the last 3 weeks, I can say that I see no
> means by which libtool can readily be used a
WERKEN BIJ DE LOTTO,
41132, NL-1007 DB AMSTERDAM,
THE NETHERLANDS.
FROM: THE DESK OF THE DIRECTOR PROMOTIONS,
INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT,
REF: WBL/67-B773524441
ATTN:
AWARD NOTIFICATION; FINAL NOTICE
We are pleased to inform you of the announcement
toda
