ASFLAGS handling for dlltool

2002-09-22 Thread Tor Lillqvist
When libool invokes dlltool on mingw (and cygwin), it needs to pass in any ASFLAGS that the client configure.in might have set, because the configure.in might set AS=gcc and ASFLAGS=-c. (If it set just AS="gcc -c" dlltool would try to invoke a program called "gcc -c", sigh. The client configure.in

Re: libfoo.la is already going to be installed in lib.

2002-09-22 Thread Harlan Stenn
> Harlan> This appears to be aproblem with libtool+automake; if I > Harlan> use a static library (no libtool) I don't see this > Harlan> problem. > > Unless I'm mistaken, you already submitted this one as PR automake/350. Could well be - things are hectic here. > Harlan> Is there a workarou

Re: Automake 1.6d available (beta for Automake 1.7)

2002-09-22 Thread Bruce Korb
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Bruce> My preference would be this: > > Could you send this to the list? Alright: I would really like to see the auto* tools packages (autoconf, automake and libtool) each adopt several of their worst clients' packages for regression testing. As each release is r

Re: libfoo.la is already going to be installed in lib.

2002-09-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> This appears to be aproblem with libtool+automake; if I Harlan> use a static library (no libtool) I don't see this Harlan> problem. Unless I'm mistaken, you already submitted this one as PR automake/350. Harlan> Is there a wor

Re: how about a bug fix release?

2002-09-22 Thread Guido Draheim
Troy Cauble wrote: > So the "Stable Release" is over a year old and only works > because the Linux distro teams are patching it. Maybe > it's time for a bug fix release? Or at least pointers to > the best patches on the home page? please, let's have one, as soon as possible. hmm, tomorrow? _