Re: [Mingw-users] Re: libbfd, libtool & Win32

2002-09-20 Thread Earnie Boyd
Guido Draheim wrote: > > Just my point. It's nice that cygwin wants to emulate the unix behaviour > to a degree that even data-symbols are im/exported in the usual manner, > that's different with mingw-software where I do take the burden to make > it ready to run in crippled environment, just to

Re: Intel icc and shared libs

2002-09-20 Thread Bill Wendling
Also sprach Philip Willoughby: } I'm having difficulty persuading libtool (version 1.4.2) to build shared } libraries using icc. Is this possible (I'm guessing not with 1.4.2)? } Assuming no, is it fixed in a newer version of libtool, or in current CVS, } or do I need an extra patch? } I find th

Re: [Mingw-users] Re: libbfd, libtool & Win32

2002-09-20 Thread Guido Draheim
David Olofson wrote: > On Wednesday 18 September 2002 22:37, Danny Smith wrote: > [...] > > >>>or does that mean we >>>either have to make assumptions, or just *require* import libs to be >>>present? >> >>The latter is certainly safer. > > > Yeah, but it doesn't work if you can't get an impo

Re: [Mingw-users] Re: libbfd, libtool & Win32

2002-09-20 Thread David Olofson
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 22:37, Danny Smith wrote: [...] > > > All the names should have stdcall decoration, but don't. > > > > Ok... Is that information at all available in a DLL, > > No. Ok. (Then I didn't miss it in the spec because of blindness...) > > or does that mean we > > either

Automake 1.6f available (beta for Automake 1.7)

2002-09-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Thanks to all people who have send patches and bug reports here is another beta for Automake 1.7. Again, please SHOUT LOUD if your package works with Automake 1.6.3 but doesn't with 1.6f. Incompatibilities are best fixed before the release. Please report any issue by mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Converting a project to libtool

2002-09-20 Thread David Olofson
On Thursday 19 September 2002 10:42, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:25:41 -0700 > > Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did that, and 0:0:3 gives me an "age is greater than current > > interface" error. > > Try "0:3:0" which will produce a library like libwhatever.so.

how about a bug fix release?

2002-09-20 Thread Troy Cauble
Using 1.4.2, I was bitten by the test/pic_mode quoting bug in ltmain.sh. I pulled branch-1-4 from cvs but for that version, ltmain.sh needs ${SED} defined by a new macro and still has issues with non-quoted test values anyway. After realizing that I didn't see this bug on my Mandrake system, I