Am Don, 2002-09-19 um 11.36 schrieb Alexandre Duret-Lutz:
> >>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ralf> This bug has been present with previous versions of automake and
> Ralf> autoconf (IIRC, it also has been reported several times before).
>
> I think this is the same
See attached.
This sample is the simplest documented valid form for creating both
shared and static libraries with current versions of gcc tools for win32
collectively known as MinGW.
Earnie.
mingwlibsample.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
libtool 1.4.2
Hi,
here is a patch for Libtool for more control about how libraries
(especially loadable modules) are compiled and linked.
First, a -no-static option is added to (a) not compile static object
files and (b) not create static libtool libraries.
Second, a -soext option is added to
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 08:50:23AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins writes:
> > then you can just reverse-engineer
> > the computation that libtool does. Then choose values for Current,
> > Revision, and Age that give you the answer you want.
>
> Or choose fresh current, revisio
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> This bug has been present with previous versions of automake and
Ralf> autoconf (IIRC, it also has been reported several times before).
I think this is the same issue as
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/libtool/2002-August/006640.h
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:25:41 -0700
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did that, and 0:0:3 gives me an "age is greater than current
> interface" error.
Try "0:3:0" which will produce a library like libwhatever.so.0.0.3.
Don't know why it was done this way but there must have been a good
> > Wouldn't it be nice, if libtool had versioned the '.a' files, too, if
the
> > -release option
> > is given? Or may be another option -staticlib-release?
> >
> > This is just a question? Or is there another style of versioning
intended
> > for the
> > static libs?
> >
>
> we had a talk about
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I did that, and 0:0:3 gives me an "age is greater than current
interface" error.
probably the "-release" flag in libtool info node "Release numbers" is what
you want. however, DWR: i think this option is somewhat frowned upon.
thi
___
Am Mit, 2002-09-18 um 23.23 schrieb Alexandre Duret-Lutz:
> Please SHOUT LOUD if your package works with Automake 1.6.3 but
> doesn't with 1.6d.
This bug has been present with previous versions of automake and
autoconf (IIRC, it also has been reported several times before).
Anyway, it is still
