Re: PATCH: pointless code removal

2002-03-06 Thread Bruce Korb
Bruce Korb wrote: > > Hi Alexandre, How's this? It fixes a bug, too. From the original: > for arg > do > case $prev in > "") ;; > xcompiler) > # Aesthetically quote the previous argument. > prev= > lastarg=`$echo "X$arg" | $Xsed -e "$sed_quote_subst

Re: PATCH: pointless code removal

2002-03-06 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Alexandre, > This wouldn't work with: > > libtool gcc -c foo.c -Xcompiler -M [['cuz libtool would then think ``-M'' is the source file...]] > Automake's depcomp sometimes appends things like `-Wc,-M', but > I'm using the equivalent `-Xcompiler -M' here because it seems > your patch remov

Re: /usr/bin/ar: arg list too long

2002-03-06 Thread Robert Boehne
Samuel: CVS head and the latest alpha libtool have this fixed. Robert -- Robert Boehne Software Engineer Ricardo Software Chicago Technical Center TEL: (630)789-0003 x. 238 FAX: (630)789-0127 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Libtool maili

Re: PATCH: pointless code removal

2002-03-06 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] adl> libtool --compile gcc -c foo.c -Xcompiler -M Of course, I meant libtool --mode=compile gcc -c foo.c -Xcompiler -M [...] -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz ___ Libtool mailing list

Re: PATCH: pointless code removal

2002-03-06 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bruce> As far as I can tell, the removed code serves no purpose Bruce> (other than obfuscation ;-): [... removal of -Xcompiler support ...] Bruce> P.S., my head hurts Bruce> Also, anyone care to comment about the handling of "srcfil