Re: ltdl.c thinks it's psychic (another SEGFAULT bug).

2001-11-11 Thread Paul Davis
>> > > what is any of this for in the first place? >> > >> >You mean why do we allos someone to define lt_dlmalloc, lt_dlrealloc, >> >and lt_dlfree? I don't know :) >> >> yes, thats precisely what i mean. what problem is this attempting to >> solve? some bizarre platform where ltdl.c can't call ma

Re: ltdl.c thinks it's psychic (another SEGFAULT bug).

2001-11-11 Thread stefan
Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > what is any of this for in the first place? > > > >You mean why do we allos someone to define lt_dlmalloc, lt_dlrealloc, > >and lt_dlfree? I don't know :) > > yes, thats precisely what i mean. what problem is this attempting to > solve? some bizarre platf