Re: Does libtool really support cross compile?

2001-10-31 Thread Guido Draheim
Es schrieb Guido Draheim: > a patch like the following. I did not test it even in a single run, > but one might use it as a guideline. *bg* ... spot the typo ;-) ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Does libtool really support cross compile?

2001-10-31 Thread Guido Draheim
Es schrieb "H . J . Lu": > > The problem I am running into is kde 3.0-alpha1. Yes, I am cross compiling > kde from RedHat 7.1/x86 to a different Linux arch. On RedHat 7.1/x86, > > # ls -l /usr/lib/libjpeg.* > -rw-r--r--1 root root 165144 Dec 11 2000 /usr/lib/libjpeg.a > -rwxr-xr-x

Very slow links: > 1 hour to link single executable - can we help?

2001-10-31 Thread Rob Browning
(After looking at the past few months of this list, I didn't see any relevant posts, but if I just overlooked them, please let me know.) With more recent libtool versions I've noticed suprisingly slow libtool link times. After some investigation, I discovered some gnome related mail discussing

Re: Does libtool really support cross compile?

2001-10-31 Thread H . J . Lu
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 09:18:35PM +0100, Guido Draheim wrote: > > Hmm, I just checked the sources of libtool - and it seems you are > absolutly correct - there is nothing that will try to detect crosscompiling > automatically and kill the native's libpath, possibly filling it with the > one bei

Re: Does libtool really support cross compile?

2001-10-31 Thread Guido Draheim
Es schrieb "H . J . Lu": > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 08:18:28PM +0100, Guido Draheim wrote: > > > > please be a bit more specific, what cross compiler do you use? > > Otherwise, 2.95.x crosscompiling does work smoothly for a lot of > > Does 2.95.x even use libtool? yupp, but I was amazed to see

Re: Does libtool really support cross compile?

2001-10-31 Thread H . J . Lu
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 08:18:28PM +0100, Guido Draheim wrote: > > please be a bit more specific, what cross compiler do you use? > Otherwise, 2.95.x crosscompiling does work smoothly for a lot of Does 2.95.x even use libtool? > platforms under my hands, but I did not check 3.0.x so far. What

Re: Does libtool really support cross compile?

2001-10-31 Thread Guido Draheim
please be a bit more specific, what cross compiler do you use? Otherwise, 2.95.x crosscompiling does work smoothly for a lot of platforms under my hands, but I did not check 3.0.x so far. What version is that "libtool in gcc 3.x". I guess it is not the fault of libtool as seen in cvs, but feel

Does libtool really support cross compile?

2001-10-31 Thread H . J . Lu
Does libtool really support cross compile? Libtool should never, ever set sys_lib_search_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib" when generating binaries for the cross target. The current libtool in gcc 3.x does it wrong. I am enclosing a patch for ltconfig here. I don't know how to fix libtool

Creating mapfile using libtool

2001-10-31 Thread sathish hebbarkalle
Hi,   I just wanted to know how to create mapfile on solaris using libtool. Reason is we have stripped symbols and we have difficulties in analysing core dumps.   Regards hebbarGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ___ Libtool