Re: Using -Bsymbolic with libtool

2001-05-09 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think you can get the exact same result by using the > -Wl,-Bsymbolic flag. It will be recognized by Libtool, > and passed to the linker. -Xlinker is a gcc equivalent > to -Wl, so if I recall correctly, that would only work > when

Re: libtool

2001-05-09 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 5:11 am, you wrote: > I am not too sure if I should tell you this or the KDE > folks. I am running > a heavily modified version of slack 7.0 and just spent many > hours trying > to figure out why KDE 2 was not compiling. It turns out > that libtool was > barfing becaus

Re: Using -Bsymbolic with libtool

2001-05-09 Thread Robert Boehne
Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: > > Hi, > > I am currently using -Bsymbolic to compile my libraries. I pass in the flag > using "-Xlinker -Bsymbolic". Is "-Bsymbolic" portable and if it is can the > flag be added to libtool directly. Linux, FreeBSD ELF, Tru64 and Solaris > seem to support it (with the

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-09 Thread Robert Boehne
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > On Monday 07 May 2001 8:13 pm, Robert Boehne wrote: > > Can I simply not allow relink_commands to be put into > > lib*.la when piecewise linking is used, or will this have > > other side effects I'm not aware of? > > I expext that it would break --fast-install-mode,

Re: Libtool drops -static from LDFLAGS?

2001-05-09 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi Alexandre, On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 03:55:36PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 8, 2001, Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Right, but the problem is that is it prevents users who "know what > > they're doing" from using gcc's "-static" option. > > Nope. -all-static does t

´äÀåÀÌ¿¹¿ä

2001-05-09 Thread vbdds3181
¿©·¯ºÐ¿¡°Ô °¡Àå ÇÊ¿äÇÏ°í À¯ÀÍÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÆÄ°ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ½Ñ °¡°Ý¿¡ °ø±ÞÇÕ´Ï´Ù ÃֽŰÔÀÓ. À¯Æ¿°ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥. MP3. ºñµð¿À½Ãµð µîµî ¸ðµç ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÆǸÅÇÕ´Ï´Ù ¹°·Ð ½Å¿ë °ÆÁ¤À» ÀüÇô ½Å°æ¾²Áö ¸¶½Ê½Ã¿ä ¾ÐÃàÈ­ÀϼÓÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» º¸½ÅÈÄ ÀüÈ­³ª ¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽʽÿä ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³½ ¾ÆÀ̵ð·Î´Â ¿¬¶ôÀÌ µÇÁö ¾

Re: Libtool drops -static from LDFLAGS?

2001-05-09 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 8, 2001, Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, but the problem is that is it prevents users who "know what > they're doing" from using gcc's "-static" option. Nope. -all-static does that. It's in the libtool manual. If they ``know what they're doing'', they should know tha