On Apr 22, 2001, Martijn van Beers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you should actually take a look at pkg-config instead of listening
> to people talking about it inaccurately.
Err... Perhaps if I had been pointed at it, instead of having had the
impression it was some tool in an early desig
On Apr 22, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It does retain the original behaviour on other platforms. The case
> statement is only for particular hosts. All other hosts keep the
> result from the fgrep test.
Indeed.
> BTW, another possible solution is to compile with CFLAGS=-s. Compiling
> with
libtool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:10:20AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I was unable to even get the test suite to complete on this platform;
>> every time the mdemo tests ran, the program it was running went runaway
>> and had to be kill -9'd. I got tired of doing
On Monday 23 April 2001 2:00 am, I wrote:
> I'm holding off the release for a day or two...
Revised release date tomorrow April 24, around 10pm GMT unless someone points
out a serious enough problem to me before then.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __ _
On 23 April, 2001 - Gary V. Vaughan sent me these 6.3K bytes:
> On Sunday 22 April 2001 7:09 am, you wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > A friend told me the about your libtool 1.4 test mail, so I tried it on
> > a few platforms..
>
> Great! Thankyou for posting your results. I am unable to reproduce y
On 23 April, 2001 - Gary V. Vaughan sent me these 6.3K bytes:
> On Sunday 22 April 2001 7:09 am, you wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > A friend told me the about your libtool 1.4 test mail, so I tried it on
> > a few platforms..
>
> Great! Thankyou for posting your results. I am unable to reproduce y
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:41:36PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2001 10:26 am, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I assume that these are mostly the known Solaris failures.
> >
> >
> > Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:
On Sunday 22 April 2001 7:09 am, you wrote:
> Hello.
>
> A friend told me the about your libtool 1.4 test mail, so I tried it on
> a few platforms..
Great! Thankyou for posting your results. I am unable to reproduce your
quote.test failure on my Solaris 8 box with the current HEAD revision.
On Monday 23 April 2001 7:08 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes:
> > I was unable to even get the test suite to complete on this platform;
> > every time the mdemo tests ran, the program it was running went runaway
> > and had to be kill -9'd. I got tired of doing this by about th
On Monday 23 April 2001 10:26 am, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I assume that these are mostly the known Solaris failures.
>
>
> Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
>
>
> checking hos
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 02:11:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This pertains to the HEAD branch.
>
> When parsing the output of /bin/nm -p, libtool.m4 contains the
> following sed statement to massage the output:
>
> # Try without a prefix undercore, then with it.
> for ac_symprfx in "" "_
On Monday 23 April 2001 2:23 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 08:05:38PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Albert Chin-A-Young writes:
> > > > Try changing the code to look like this:
> > > >
> > > > if test -L "$file" >/dev/null 2>&1 || test -h "$file" >/dev/null
> > >
This pertains to the HEAD branch.
When parsing the output of /bin/nm -p, libtool.m4 contains the
following sed statement to massage the output:
# Try without a prefix undercore, then with it.
for ac_symprfx in "" "_"; do
# Write the raw and C identifiers.
[lt_cv_sys_global_symbol_pipe="sed -n
While running ./configure for libtool 1.4 on a hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00
system:
...
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
...
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking for dlopen in -ldl... no
checking for dlopen... yes
checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes
chec
Russ Allbery writes:
> I was unable to even get the test suite to complete on this platform;
> every time the mdemo tests ran, the program it was running went runaway
> and had to be kill -9'd. I got tired of doing this by about the fifth
> time. :/
Sounds familiar. Try the patch I just poste
With the patch below I get all *82* tests to pass on this platform. The
build-relink2.test proclaims:
$ ./build-relink2.test
=== Running build-relink2.test
= Exiting: ../depdemo/l3/libl3.la is not a shared library
$ echo $?
77
Make of that what you wish. ;-)
2001-04-23 Peter Eisentraut <[E
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:10:20AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I was unable to even get the test suite to complete on this platform;
> every time the mdemo tests ran, the program it was running went runaway
> and had to be kill -9'd. I got tired of doing this by about the fifth
> time. :/
Comp
Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A necessary (and sufficient AFAICT) condition would be that, given the fact
> that libtool remember library dependencies, one use a tsort-like tool to
> topologically sort all the libraries, while detecting loops in the
> dependencies, and emitti
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:04:37AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There were some warnings during some of the tests, though.
>
>
> Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
>
>
> ch
I was unable to even get the test suite to complete on this platform;
every time the mdemo tests ran, the program it was running went runaway
and had to be kill -9'd. I got tired of doing this by about the fifth
time. :/
Configuring libtool 1
In regard to: 1.3e (1.910) test results for alpha-dec-osf4.0f (PASS), Russ...:
>There were some warnings during some of the tests, though.
>
>
>Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
>---
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> I must say that my spidey-sense tells me that `static inline' is a GNU
> extension...
Yep, but the autoconf macro AC_C_INLINE is used, which #define's inline
away in config.h, if inline isn't supported by the compiler (although it
tests only fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Havoc Pennington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 4:46 PM
> To: Alexandre Oliva
> Cc: Eric Lemings; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config
>
>
>
> Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On
There were some warnings during some of the tests, though.
Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
checking host system type... alpha-dec-osf4.0f
checking build system type... a
Similar results to AIX 4.3, including the same error during configure.
Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
checking host system type... rs6000-ibm-aix4.2.1.0
checking build
Identical results to sparc-sun-solaris2.8, with the same failing tests.
Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
checking host system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.6
checking build
I assume that these are mostly the known Solaris failures.
Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
checking host system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.8
checking build system type..
Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
checking host system type... powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0
checking build system type... powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0
checking for ld used by GCC... /b
Not like this is a surprise or anything, but for completeness
Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system ty
Whoops, sorry, I should add that this was with:
Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53)
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gcc 2.95.3, SGI native ld.
> [...]
> FAIL: h
gcc 2.95.3, SGI native ld.
[...]
FAIL: hardcode.test
411202:lt-hell: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in lt-hell: foo
411202:lt-hell: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in lt-hell: nothing
411202:lt-hell: rld: Fatal Error: this executable has unresolvable symbols
PASS: build-relink.test
[...]
412530:
On Thursday 19 April 2001 11:08 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2001, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's the kind of problem deplib tests are supposed to catch
>
> I lied :-)
>
> Thanks Gary for setting me straight.
>
> We should definitely make one of the deplib librari
On Sunday 22 April 2001 1:40 am, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Have either of you had any success with my workaround?
> >
> >make ECHO="/bin/sh `pwd`/libtool --fallback-echo"
> >
> > Or something equivalent...
>
> Not quite sure I understand. Should t
33 matches
Mail list logo
