On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \
> > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la
>
> > Which is what I want. However, libtool then issues this command.
>
On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \
> lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la
> Which is what I want. However, libtool then issues this command.
> c++ -o foo ./libs/lib1.a ./libs/lib2.a
Which version of libtool are you usi
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:35:09AM -0800, Kaelin Colclasure wrote:
> Greetings,
Hi there!
> I'm a relative newcomer to libtool and have just subscribed to this list,
> so please forgive me if I'm re-raising an old issue here.
>
> I have noticed an issue with including explicit _init and _fini
>
Greetings,
I'm a relative newcomer to libtool and have just subscribed to this list,
so please forgive me if I'm re-raising an old issue here.
I have noticed an issue with including explicit _init and _fini
definitions in a Linux .so with the following version of libtool:
[kaelin@vanguard downl
I'm attempting to libtoolize a large package, and am running into a
significant problem.
For reasons which are known only to itself, gcc refuses to link all
the static archives that make up this package unless they are declared
multiple times on the command line. So, I want to do something lik
