Re: AIX details

2000-10-04 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Oct 4, 2000, "Howard Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Makes sense. How do you want to work things? Do you have patches against > 1.3, or > against something newer? It's going to take me a little time to get my > patches > synced up with the current libtool source. Thanks for your effort. I

LDFLAGS / LDADD / LIBADD (was: libtool / C++ / inter library dependencies)

2000-10-04 Thread Michael Forster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Another question: What is the difference between xy_LDFLAGS = -lz and xy_LDADD = libz.la and which of them should I use? Please just ignore the -L and -R flags and the library path for this case. I know (I hope :-) how to h

RE: AIX details

2000-10-04 Thread Howard Chu
Makes sense. How do you want to work things? Do you have patches against 1.3, or against something newer? It's going to take me a little time to get my patches synced up with the current libtool source. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wedn

Re: AIX details

2000-10-04 Thread mcnichol
Hi Howard, I also have some libtool changes for AIX I have been getting ready to send in. Would you mind coordinating/merging our changes so we don't possibly end up stepping on each other? Dan McNichol IBM Austin, Texas > From: "Howard Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I've made some patches to l

LD_RUN_PATH (was: libtool / C++ / inter library dependencies)

2000-10-04 Thread Michael Forster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I wrote: > Shared C++ Library liba.so, > Shared C++ Library libb.so, > > libb.so depends on liba.so. > > [...] > > ->ldd libb.so > liba.so.0 => ./liba.so.0 > libstdc++.so.2.10.0 => (file not found) I know now, what the pr