Re: libltdl fix

2000-09-01 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Sep 1, 2000, Patrick Tullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think something isn't quite right in the shared-library detection > code in configure. (Quite possible when cross-compiling to the > OSKit.) But, this patch at least lets my build complete... > Any objections? I think the right

Re: Re[2]: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-01 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Sep 1, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. And know why? Because they want to support outdated betas! Come on. I've already posted a message saying that we should probably give up on supporting early betas, as long as we detect them as such and disable the creation o

Re[2]: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-01 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Charles, Charles S. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CSW> Well, the problem with libtool is that it's a developer's tool. Take CSW> the gettext package, for instance. It uses some version of libtool that CSW> does not understand cygwin/dlls. The only way to 'fix' it is to replace CSW>