Hi,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 04:01:10PM -0400, Paul Berrevoets wrote:
> Thomas Tanner wrote:
>
> > Yep. That's already implemented in CVS libtool:
>
> Just a minor question ... does CVS libtool require CVS autoconf and/or CVS
> automake?
No. The multi-language branch should work with stable a
Thomas Tanner wrote:
> Yep. That's already implemented in CVS libtool:
Just a minor question ... does CVS libtool require CVS autoconf and/or CVS
automake?
--
Thanks,
Paul
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:02:55PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2000, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi -
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 07:10:13PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libt
On 19-Jul-2000 Chris wrote:
>> > On Solaris, libtool does not allow me to do the following:
>> >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libfoo.la -rpath
>> > /usr/local/lib foo.lo /usr/local/lib/libbar.a
>> > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libtool
>> >
On 19-Jul-2000 Paul Berrevoets wrote:
>> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libfoo.la -rpath
> /usr/local/lib foo.lo /usr/local/lib/libbar.a
> libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libtool
> objects: /usr/local/lib/libbar.a
>
> and yet the Solaris linker a
