test failed

2000-05-29 Thread Mocha
# make check | grep FAIL FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: hardcode.test FAIL: build-relink.test that was on NetBSD-1.4Y/Alpha (ELF) and libtool 1.3.5. how can in find out why the test failed and track down the errors.

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-29 Thread Kevin Atkinson
On 29 May 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 29, 2000, Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In general, this statement is false. The Solaris (>=2.5) linker _does_ > > allow non-PIC code in shared libraries. > > Ok. The problem is that gcc links shared libraries with `-z text', >

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 29, 2000, Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In general, this statement is false. The Solaris (>=2.5) linker _does_ > allow non-PIC code in shared libraries. Ok. The problem is that gcc links shared libraries with `-z text', unless `-mimpure-text' is given. Maybe that's the fl

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-29 Thread Paul Berrevoets
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 29, 2000, Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is a bug in gcc at least til 2.8.1 (no 2.95 here at the > > moment): > > > _IO_do_write0x8c > > /opt/GCC281/lib/libstdc++. > > a(stdiostream.o) > > Not a bug. It's just that libs

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 26, 2000, Michael Matz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 25 May 2000, Ossama Othman wrote: >> Hmm, I though that Alexandre as already took care of this. Not me, but the patch is already in. > Hmm, it seems the newest diff to libtool-ml has something, but it > only deals with strippin

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 29, 2000, Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ossama Othman wrote: >> Now that I think about it, libtool is only reproducing what the C++ >> compiler would normally do internally, so why would libtool be wrong? >> Specifically, libtool disables the internal library link commands th

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 29, 2000, Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a bug in gcc at least til 2.8.1 (no 2.95 here at the > moment): > _IO_do_write0x8c > /opt/GCC281/lib/libstdc++. > a(stdiostream.o) Not a bug. It's just that libstdc++ is not PIC, and Solaris' lin

Re: libtool patch to allow overriding AR_FLAGS

2000-05-29 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Jason, Fred, Sorry for the delay -- I am working through my email backlog after an extended period of busyness... On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 02:29:09PM -0800, Jason Merrill wrote: > A while back, Fred Fish wrote this patch to allow an environment to > override AR_FLAGS, presumably for use on BeO

Re: ltcf-cxx.sh

2000-05-29 Thread Stephan Kulow
Ossama Othman wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 07:37:11PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote: > > I was just informed that the HEAD branch does indeed drop static library > > dependencies when making shared libraries. Perhaps the HEAD branch needs > > to be merged with the ML branch or