On Fri, 26 May 2000, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I am missing something here but can't you just let g++ handle all
> > the C++ issues. If G++ does call the native linker and you need to pass
> > special options too it this native linker is boun
Hi Ossama,
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Ossama Othman wrote:
> > It's smoking already ;) Even with problem reports ;)
>
> Great! Well, at least for the libtool team. :-)
Hehe ;)
> > Btw. just a small thing: in all 'case' statements testing for $CXX you
> > should use $compiler, as $CXX can have argum
Hi,
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > Great. Note that it's all not only depending on the compiler, but also on
> > the actual linker used, so $with_gnu_ld should also be tested. E.g. just
> > today I had a report from someone using KDE on Solaris with gcc and GNU
> > ld. Currently t
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 05:01:35AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 26, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My workload has now eased enough to allow to get back to hacking
> > libtool, and I plan to release 1.3.5 this weekend. Is there anything
> > pending that I shou
The parsing of /usr/bin/nm output on AIX (at least 4.1.4.0 and
4.3.2.0) fails.
config.log:
ltconfig:1871: eval "nm conftest.o | sed -n -e 's/^.*[ ]\([BCDT]\)[][
]*\(\)\([_A-Za-z][_A-Za-z0-9]*\)$/\1 \2\3 \3/p' > conftest.nm"
cannot run sed -n -e 's/^.*[]\([BCDT]\)[][ ]*\(\
On May 26, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My workload has now eased enough to allow to get back to hacking
> libtool, and I plan to release 1.3.5 this weekend. Is there anything
> pending that I should incorporate into the tree before I roll it up
> and ship it out?
You ma
Hello everyone,
My workload has now eased enough to allow to get back to hacking
libtool, and I plan to release 1.3.5 this weekend. Is there anything
pending that I should incorporate into the tree before I roll it up
and ship it out?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __
