Re: Target for libtool?

2000-05-09 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 9, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gary> Hmm. I'm pretty sure autoconf 2.13 set target to "NONE". > Yes, it did, definitely. But it makes the code much simpler not to > give a default value. Now, if you think t

Re: Target for libtool?

2000-05-09 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:10:06PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: > > "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Gary> Hmm. I'm pretty sure autoconf 2.13 set target to "NONE". > > Yes, it did, definitely. But it makes the code much simpler not to > give a default value. Now, if

Re: Target for libtool?

2000-05-09 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 8, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what I said still stands Yup >> We'll have to review this code and remove all references to target, >> and use host wherever we currently refer to target. > Well volunteered ;') Yup, it's in my to-do list. -- Alexandre Oliva

Re: Target for libtool?

2000-05-09 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gary> Hmm. I'm pretty sure autoconf 2.13 set target to "NONE". Yes, it did, definitely. But it makes the code much simpler not to give a default value. Now, if you think this is the beginning of troubles, we might change it back :(