missing .deps/dtedio.pp

2000-05-01 Thread Ted Irons
Thanks in advance for your help. I am running autoconf-2.13 and automake-1.4 with the multi-language-branch of libtool on an IRIX64-6.5 machine using MIPSpro CC Version 7.2.1.3m. My configure line was CC=CC RANLIB=: ../dted-0.0.0/configure --prefix=$PFX --exec-prefix=$EPFX Why am I getting the

Publishing Opportunities for Authors

2000-05-01 Thread Webmaster
Are you or have you been frustrated trying to get your book published? Are you interested in getting published without hassles like, publishers rejections, the high costs of printing your own books, and minimum print runs and ware house storage? At writerspress we have a revolutionary new progra

Re: [mingw] Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases

2000-05-01 Thread Mumit Khan
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > O, I used to ask Mumit Khan why he distributes such outdated, > 19990818 binutils for mingw32, and got answer that there's bad > attitudes of binutils maintainers towards pe frontend. Now, when > official Cygnus release contains the same, I see that

Re: Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases

2000-05-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:18:58 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> O, I used to ask Mumit Khan why he distributes such outdated, 19990818 binutils for mingw32, and got answer that there's bad attitudes of binutils maintainers towards pe frontend. Now, when officia

Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases

2000-05-01 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello libtool, This is a forwarded message From: Paul Sokolovsky To: DJ Delorie Date: Saturday, April 29, 2000, 1:43:49 PM Subject: Question about binutils of cygwin 1.1.0 ===8<==Original message text=== Hello DJ, O, I used to ask Mumit Khan why he distributes such out