On Apr 14, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I honestly don't see what the hell is wrong with using a shell script to
> do this so a binary can be relocating.
1) You have to figure out whether to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH, SHLIB_PATH,
LD32_LIBRARY_PATH, LD64_LIBRARY_PATH, etc.
2) You
On Apr 14, 2000, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that since free software is available with full source code, it
> can be compiled to specifically match a particular system
> configuration if an appropriate binary distribuition for that system
> is not available.
As long as the
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >
> > > Commercial programs typically include a shell script which sets
> > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH (and other variables) in order to find the package
> > > com
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> > Commercial programs typically include a shell script which sets
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH (and other variables) in order to find the package
> > components. While this may be fine for commercial software, i
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Commercial programs typically include a shell script which sets
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH (and other variables) in order to find the package
> components. While this may be fine for commercial software, it is not
> acceptable for free software since free sof
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > Try supporting this for 5000 users of your installed program across
> > 5000 workstations/PCs. This approach fails miserably. Besides the
> > effort to get your users to use the same LD_LIBRARY_PATH, there is the
> > problem with conflicts between si
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > Doesn't either setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or the equivalent variable for
> > your particular system) or adding the weird location to /etc/ld.so.conf
> > (or the equivalent file for your particular system)
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> Doesn't either setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or the equivalent variable for
> your particular system) or adding the weird location to /etc/ld.so.conf
> (or the equivalent file for your particular system) generally solve the
> problem?
Try supporting this f
On 14 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Doesn't either setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or the equivalent variable for
> > your particular system) or adding the weird location to /etc/ld.so.conf
> > (or the equivalent file for your partic
On Apr 14, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't either setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or the equivalent variable for
> your particular system) or adding the weird location to /etc/ld.so.conf
> (or the equivalent file for your particular system) generally solve the
> problem?
It s
10 matches
Mail list logo
