Re: State of win32 dll support in libtool at CVS

2000-03-31 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:29:46 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Shared DLLs Building:require special support doesn't require special support (namely, building with PIC) (are built from the same

Re: Re[4]: State of win32 dll support in libtool at CVS

2000-03-31 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:29:46PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello Gary, Hi Paul, > Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > GVV> Unfortunately the dll architecture is so bust, that it would be unfair > GVV> to use it as a baseline for all the nicer shared library architectures > GV

Re[4]: State of win32 dll support in libtool at CVS

2000-03-31 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Gary, Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [] GVV> Unfortunately the dll architecture is so bust, that it would be unfair GVV> to use it as a baseline for all the nicer shared library architectures GVV> libtool supports. Which shared library architectures are nicer - those whi

Re: Application of convenience libraries?

2000-03-31 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
This is regarding my posting last night regarding linkage problems when linking programs against a library which was built, in part, from a convenience library. There is a grevious error in my description of the problem. Rather than conflicting symbols, the current problem is that there are unre