Application of convenience libraries?

2000-03-30 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
In an effort to re-organize the ImageMagick source tree, I have moved many files which are part of the ImageMagick library (libMagick.[a|so]) to a seperate directory. I then build these files into a convenience library, and link against the convenience library when creating libMagick. This works

Re: Re[4]: Very reason for not using gcc to link shared libraries?

2000-03-30 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Mar 30, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AO> I'm sure Gary will tell you how impossible that is to achieve, because AO> of the brain-damaged way in which DLLs were designed on MS-Windows. > Yes, we already had little talk on this. But that's what ignorant > newcomers are good

Re: Re[2]: Very reason for not using gcc to link shared libraries?

2000-03-30 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 09:59:07AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 29, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I'd like to do now is try to make up-to-seamless > > support for win32 dlls. If you only care about win32, life becomes much easier. In fact you probably should

Re[4]: Very reason for not using gcc to link shared libraries?

2000-03-30 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Gary, Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GVV> On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 09:59:07AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Mar 29, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > What I'd like to do now is try to make up-to-seamless >> > support for win32 dlls. GVV> If you onl

Re[4]: Very reason for not using gcc to link shared libraries?

2000-03-30 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Alexandre, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's nice. What I'd like to do now is try to make up-to-seamless >> support for win32 dlls. I'm glad to know that there's no problem >> with using gcc to link on *that platform*. AO> I'm sure Gary will tell you how impossible that