On Mar 21, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok thanks. I think I will try it out. Should I just grab the latest or
> is there a particular branch/date you recommend I try.
The latest should be fine. It hasn't changed much lately, anyway.
> It sounds like using something simi
On 20 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The current version of libtool's does not support linking to other
> > libtool's libraries. Does the current CVS version?
>
> Yep, sorry, forgot to mention that :-(
>
> > How stable is th
On 20 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2000, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -o
> > display display.o magick/libMagick.la
>
> Does libMagick.la (the script) contains both -R flags? What was the
> c
On Mar 20, 2000, "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice I've hardcoded "deplibs_check_method=pass_all" myself in ltmain.sh
> in some project, because libtool kept dropping the libs my library depend
> on...
It would also be nice to have this defined for BeOS, if it works
properly.
On Mar 19, 2000, Erik Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Flag that allows shared libraries with undefined symbols to be built.
> allow_undefined_flag="unsupported"
This used to be true in older releases of BeOS. I'm not sure when the
restriction was lifted, so we need some BeOS expert to t
On Mar 20, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The current version of libtool's does not support linking to other
> libtool's libraries. Does the current CVS version?
Yep, sorry, forgot to mention that :-(
> How stable is the CVS version?
I've been using it for Kaffe, and others
On 20 Mar 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I want to have to [two?] different interfaces into the same library.
Yes 2.
>
> You can't do that in a single library, in general. It's a matter of
> the linker finding one library expec
On Mar 20, 2000, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -o
> display display.o magick/libMagick.la
Does libMagick.la (the script) contains both -R flags? What was the
command used to link it?
--
Alexandre OlivaEnjoy
On Mar 19, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to have to [two?] different interfaces into the same library.
You can't do that in a single library, in general. It's a matter of
the linker finding one library expecting a certain interface, and
finding one that doesn't comply
Hello there,
I am writing to you folks as I am wondering if a tool suite of ours
could make use of or contribute to libtool, automake and possibly
autoconf. The suite in question is called SRT, for Software Release
Tools; we use it in much of our software development. It is a set of
shell scrip
Some of you may recall that I reported a linkage problem when using
CVS libtool, and relying on its library dependency support under
Solaris 2.6. The problem seems to be that although LDFLAGS is
specified as:
'LDFLAGS= -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib
-R/usr/openwin/lib'
to c
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 10:16:13PM -0500, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
: Some one in personal email said:
:
: > This is what proper design of header files is all about. Don't put
: > what you don't want used in the installed header files.
:
: I just KNEW someone would say that. The thing is programs t
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:41:03AM +0100, Erik Eriksson wrote:
: Hi,
:
: I have problems getting libtool to create shared libraries under BeOS.
: When examining the libtool-script and comparing with another platform,
: it seems that if I change the definition below:
:
: # Flag that allows shared
13 matches
Mail list logo
