Re: ltconfig decision in creating shared (c++) libraries on solaris.

2000-02-16 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi Martin, On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 03:06:06PM -0800, Ossama Othman wrote: > it seems like it might be useful. I won't have to look at > implementing such a feature for a while, however. Does anyone have This should have been "I won't have time to look at..."

Re: ltconfig decision in creating shared (c++) libraries on solaris.

2000-02-16 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi Martin, On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 04:19:41PM -0500, Martin Proulx wrote: > I simply manually edited the resulting libtool file. This isn't the > correct thing to do, but this will allow me to correctly build my c++ > shared libs on solaris. I've attached the original, unmodified libtool > crea

Re: ltconfig decision in creating shared (c++) libraries on solaris.

2000-02-16 Thread Martin Proulx
Ossama Othman wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > The only glitch is that the c++ tag deplibs_check_method was set to > > "unknown". > > > > I manually modified it to "pass_all" (to match the C one, and I then had > > a perfectly working libtool. > > There are some other known glitches that I'm w

Re: ltconfig decision in creating shared (c++) libraries on solaris.

2000-02-16 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi Martin, On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 11:35:12AM -0500, Martin Proulx wrote: > Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > C++ support is under development in the multi-language-branch of the > > libtool CVS tree. Feel free to give it a try, and please report any > > problems you find. > > I tried it, and I'm very

Re: ltconfig decision in creating shared (c++) libraries on solaris.

2000-02-16 Thread Martin Proulx
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Feb 15, 2000, Martin Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > C++ support is under development in the multi-language-branch of the > libtool CVS tree. Feel free to give it a try, and please report any > problems you find. > > -- > Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.