Re: [freedesktop/libreoffice-cppunit] Feature/cmake (#2)

2018-05-23 Thread claus . klein . sha
Hi Markus, I understand your concerns. IMHO cmake is more portable than autoconf, and even much more simpler to use! If you need help, I am willing to try my best. I see not the need to support autoconf and cmake. I would terminate the autconf support. Kind regards Claus > Am 23.05.2018 um 02

Fwd: [freedesktop/libreoffice-cppunit] Feature/cmake (#2)

2018-05-10 Thread claus . klein . sha
How can a contribute a new feature? > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: > > Von: fdo-mirror > Betreff: Aw: [freedesktop/libreoffice-cppunit] Feature/cmake (#2) > Datum: 10. Mai 2018 um 21:03:52 MESZ > An: freedesktop/libreoffice-cppunit > Kopie: Claus Klein , Author > > Antwort an: freed

Re: [freedesktop/libreoffice-cppunit] Feature/cmake (#2)

2018-05-10 Thread claus . klein . sha
Hi, there is a nice way on github to get my patch as a single file file: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/freedesktop/libreoffice-cppunit/pull/2.patch It would be nice to have cmake build g