Hi All,
Looks like we have a new contributor who wants to tackle this one but
needs some assistance for code pointers.
In Linux when you do Save As the first period is detected for the file
name instead of the last so you'll get partial file names highlighted if
the file name as a period in it.
Hi All,
Once again doing a massive cleanup of NEEDINFO - any FDO emails in the
next 3-4 minutes are likely to be part of this cleanup and can thus be
ignored.
I will be doing more either today or tomorrow with a follow up email.
All the best,
Joel
___
Hi All,
Just got done changing all ProposedEasyHack to NeedsDevEval. Having
ProposedEasyHack was causing some confusion and caused some headaches
for queries so the new status is once agains *NeedsDevEval.
*Change:
Old: ProposedEasyHack
New: NeedsDevEval
I left Resolved bugs alone just to avoid
Hi All,
So something is up and I'm getting errors when I try to build the
dependencies needed to build LibreOffice:
joel@Studio-1737:/data/libreoffice/instdir/program$ sudo apt-get
build-dep libreoffice
[sudo] password for joel:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading
Hey Bjoern & Anurag,
'libboost1.54-dev (>= 1.39)' should be in 13.10 (saucy):
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+package/libboost1.54-dev
So you'll have to find out why apt thinks its a a bad idea to install it ('but
it is not going to be installed'). To find out more, one easy step would be
As far as i see, LibreOffice still cannot export form control fields
to a docx file, while it can export to doc format.
There are some bug reports pointing specific form controls, like
"checkbox is missing when saving docx, text field is missing" etc.
LibreOffice cannot save any variations i
Hi All,
So the Sergio Callegari (reported quite a bit) has seen some data
corruption with 4.2.2.1. Unfortunately he didn't have any reproducible
steps or a file so I closed the bug but he said it was more to "raise
awareness early" which I agree with. FWIW I haven't seen any data
corruption with 4
Hi All,
Just got done with a large FDO cleanup so apologies for any flood in the
email - any FDO mails in the last 5 minutes or so can be ignored/deleted
as they just contain a standard message for NEEDINFO bugs.
All the best,
Joel
___
LibreOffice mai
>
> just curious to know if you have detailed stats about each one of this
> NEEINFO-->INVALID cleanups
> how many of the bugs become INVALID?
I did the first round but stats take a lot of time and I just don't have
it. The first round it was about 75% went to INVALID and 25% moved
forward - which
source/text/scalc/01/04060107.xhp | 123 +-
1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 578e1e320daaa82b2d3b8c0eeea84bf704967939
Author: Joel Madero
Date: Wed Oct 26 13:02:16 2016 -0700
tdf#103397 - added example for
helpcontent2 |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 006884d7928c6b32cf0bb3f48e31bbac87d1d5ea
Author: Joel Madero
Date: Wed Oct 26 13:02:16 2016 -0700
Updated core
Project: help 578e1e320daaa82b2d3b8c0eeea84bf704967939
tdf#103397 - added
Hi All,
Was tested by Cor and Terrence and closed as WFM. One down :)
Best,
Joel
On 03/29/2016 12:24 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen
> wrote:
>> LibreOffice Writer has only 8 unresolved, fully confirmed, triaged and
>> bibisected r
Hi All,
I don't know if anyone has a repository of test files for
interoperability but one of our great users provided a test file and
reported a whole slew of interop bugs about it.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=118139
Bug #'s
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug
On 12/14/2015 06:13 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Do you think you can take a look at it "fast" or should we revert?
I don't remember why/how I was involved with this? Did I say I would
test it and somehow it fell through the list of things that I have to
do? What should I "look at"? Was it my
On 12/14/2015 06:46 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Was Caolan's commit, you said you would test "not before this weekend"
> (a month ago), and to please poke you again "by Sunday" but nobody
> poked you. (The poke fell through the list of things *I* have to do.)
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/
Hi All,
QA is going to have a meeting second week of December about regressions
and what we (QA) can realistically do to help move things forward. The
goal is to address all concerns/suggestions, talk about the realities of
the project, and discuss what has already been rejected by ESC (such as
a
e settings:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems?
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/arch
On 10/16/2015 08:29 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>> Great news. Do we have any stats on the % of those that are now resolved?
>>
> Sure thing: 62% of the bugs currently bibisected are RESOLVED or CLOSED.
>
> (CLOSED bugs
> * ABANDONED
> * INSUFFICIENT DATA (RedHat)
> * EXPIRED (Launchpad)
Of these I like ABANDONED as it indicates that the user abandoned
his/her own bug. Insufficient Data is really wordy to me, Expired
indicates that the user could just set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and
say "this is still a vali
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can
> not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one
> time crash and no stack trace, no exact steps to reproduce, even if the
> reporter was or would be w
On 11/09/2015 11:15 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:10:44PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
>> Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can
>> not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one
>> time crash and no stack trace, no
>
>
> I think we should keep labeling those as INVALID
>
> IMHO the time spent to implement this new
> ABANDONED/EXPIRED/WHATEVERstate will be almost useless...
>
> in both cases the fault of the bug closure is the reporting user
> so I really do not care at all being diplomatic with people who do
I'll take a look but it won't be before this weekend. If someone else
can check first that would be appreciated (please let me know so I don't
duplicate work). If I don't respond by Sunday please poke me again.
Best,
Joel
On 11/11/2015 03:07 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the context
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
Trying to compile older versions of OOo in order to track down a bug but
I'm hitting a missing cups.h when trying to compile. I have the appropriate
cups dev files installed. I have tried on Bodhi as well as Ubuntu 11.10. I
also have verified that cups.h exists in the appropriate folder
Thank you
relatively easily.
Thank you
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:52 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> > Trying to compile older versions of OOo in order to track down a bug
> > but I'm hitting a missing cups.h when trying to compi
tempt to contribute to LO and it's been an ongoing annoyance for me as I
outline a lot. Thanks for the input from both of you
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> Joel Madero schrieb:
>
> I've never used dnl check before, can you give me
Trying to compile newest release of libreoffice and coming up with
errors, here's a pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/xbk1xGLP
Followed instructions on libreoffice dev build website.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://list
Hi All,
Trying to find the location and the manner in which libreoffice protects
files. Anyone know where I can locate the appropriate source file, what the
object names are that I should look for, and if possible direct me to the
documentation. Thanks in advance
Joel
Hi All,
Got this error about 85-90% into build last night:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making ../libreoffice-core-3.5.3.2/moz
it seems that the error is inside 'moz', please re-run build inside this
module to isolate the error and/or test your fix:
Furthermore, when I try to do as it says
right one.
Any ideas how this can be, I like working backwards so it'd be nice to
see what I'm missing. Thanks for the help
On 05/28/2012 03:41 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Joel,
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 23:34 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Trying to find the location and the manner in whi
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Stefan Knorr (Astron) <
heinzless...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> not that I am a very good person to answer this, but are you sure you
> are using the builtin file picker instead of the native one? AFAIK,
> the files in fpicker are specific to LibO's buil
Yeah that's the only one I found as well but changing it doesn't change the
text at all when you go to Save As (the bottom left corner where it says
Save with password) which is the dilemma I'm facing :/
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
>
>
> On 2012-
SWORD_FILTEROPTIONS:
>
> in which case changing the LO source is not going to help :-(
>
>
> On 2012-05-30 17:35, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> Yeah that's the only one I found as well but changing it doesn't change
> the text at all when you go to Save As (the bottom le
Oh okay, I'm running this on *nix so hopefully that isn't the case. Thanks
for the help, going to look into that other src file that you provided
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
>
>
> On 2012-05-30 17:46, Joel Madero wrote:
>
>> I'll look in
hu, May 31, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 08:46 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> > I'll look into that second src file, I wonder how I missed it.
>
>I imagine it is the ~ which tags an accelerator (rendering the next
> c
It would be really really nice to have some indicator on the feature
request(s) bug report(s) site that shows that a project has been accepted
by someone and any people who have agreed to help. This way for new users
who want to start on a basic project, they can see what's available without
having
I'll see what I can come up with. This would be a bit of a major so I'll
update one section and see what people think.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Feel free to create an account for yourself and update the wiki :-)
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8
legible and less links to wonder
through.
Joel
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Excellent. That would be very welcome.
>
>
> On 2012-05-31 22:51, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> I'll see what I can come up with. This would be a bit of a major so I'll
>
Here is my log, thanks in advance:
http://pastebin.com/tY9t8sgt
Joel Madero
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Will do, I'll try the fix and see how it goes. Appreciate it
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 09:31 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> > Here is my log, thanks in advance:
>
> Best thing to do when asking these questions is to give the
I created a new page and looking for feedback before I complete it. I
wanted every bug listed on one page sortable by end user. Furthermore,
wanted to include additional information so it would be a bit easier for
developers to see information about the bug without having to actually
click on it. I
atus
> >)
>
> To be honest, I have to admit that I do not understand the benefit of
> the column showing the number of mailing lists.
>
> --
> Philipp
>
> 2012/6/1 Joel Madero :
> > I created a new page and looking for feedback before I complete it. I
> wanted
>
No good, still a problem.
Output for rev-parse HEAD
80d5a21acb6db619eb9bd67a1ed9dcdf937c389f
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Will do, I'll try the fix and see how it goes. Appreciate it
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
&
Yeah, still no luck
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Riccardo Magliocchetti <
riccardo.magliocche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il 02/06/2012 18:32, Greg KH ha scritto:
>
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:03:29PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>>
>>> Will do, I'll try the fix
add the ability to
download CSV files with all data instead of a truncated version
Joel
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Yeah I agreed with that after doing it. My initial thought was it would
> give a developer an idea of how many people were involved and thus if they
>
la.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
> for which there are various client libraries
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:Addons#Client_libraries_for_the_Bugzilla_Webservices.2FREST_API
>
> which you might be able to use to automate this process.
>
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Joel Mader
a beginner but not absolute beginner so that gives a
bit of a scope of my abilities. Thanks again to all of you
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Markus Mohrhard <
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> 2012/6/2 Joel Madero :
> > In order to use the API wou
Also solved, guess my first time I didn't fully do make clean right. Thanks
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:48:43PM +0200, Mat M wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > So do I.
> >
> > Before tail_build?clean, I was stuck on itools library; after with
> > isdbt one.
Hi All,
Going to try to build the updated git every month for Bodhi repository but
I need to separate LO like Ubuntu does. I want to know how to build each
component the same way. Examples include:
libreoffice-base
office productivity suite -- database
libreoffice-calc
office productivity suite
Just to add to the ongoing disappointment with CTL, came across FDO 42123
which is another user stating that CTL is outdated, confusing, etc
Ultimately it seems like people want to purge CTL completely but that seems
unlikely. I'm still wondering if we're nearing consensus on if we can
enable
Hi All,
This seems to be one of the most consistent complaints from users as I'm
going through the bug list. The issue is three fold (or more).
1. Defaults "hijack" everything -- vs. defaulting to allow users to select
2. No check to see if Microsoft Office is installed and thus some prompt to
s
stions ;)
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> 2012/7/3 Joel Madero :
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This seems to be one of the most consistent complaints from users as I'm
> > going through the bug list. The issue is three fold (or mor
Hi All,
Summary: Trying to find out how libreoffice is handling Open vs. Recent
Documents on the backing window that comes up with ./soffice
Details:
I spent time in the IRC chat a couple days ago trying to get help on this
one and another hour or two looking at code has gotten me no where
(alth
Someone else suggested there also but I'm not seeing anything that would
differentiate Open vs. Recent Documents on the backingwindow.
Thanks for the input, really want to track this one down
Joel
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Hi Joel
>
>
> On 05.07
I'm trying to extend the area of the recent document drop down menu, none
of the other ones. I want to increase the size of that one and decrease the
size of the open dialog.
Joel
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> On 06.07.2012 19:17, Joel Madero wrote:
>
>
to the bug (or enhancement depending on your opinion of it).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47164
Thanks again for everyone's patience.
Joel
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 08:17 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
&g
Hi All,
There are quite a few open bugs that are currently being discussed by
dev/q&a/UX etcI was wondering if everyone (or most everyone) is
comfortable adding a new white board status so we can mark the bugs as NEW
but set them as DECISIONPENDING. Then a quick comment to say that we're
discu
David fixed this bug and I talked to him earlier about if we should
re-enable Mozilla by default. Anyone have an opinion about it?
Joel
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Here is the log
>
>
> Joel
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Michael Meeks wro
Hi All,
What's the easiest way to trigger the filter dialog seen here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=55136&action=edit
I'm working on the bug but can't really test anything because I can't
figure out how to force the dialog to appear. Appreciate any guidance (or a
file that will
random garbage extension (.abc) with emacs,
leafpad, and writerall opened fine
Joel
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 03:59 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> What's the easiest way to trigger the filter dialog seen here:
>>
nice. Looking in the backingwindow.cxx I see where
basically everything else is being called (all the buttons) but I don't see
where that arrow is coming from.
Thanks again,
Joel
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 08:54 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>
Hi All,
I've handled FDO 47164 but need input to see if we'll actually implement.
Summary: User thinks that recent documents arrow hot spot is too small on
our backing window
Solution: I moved the horizontal bar to the left a bit and increased the
arrow size quite a bit.
Here is a before:
http
Made then public. Sorry about that
On Jul 11, 2012 2:46 PM, "Philipp Riemer" wrote:
> 2012/7/11 Joel Madero :
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've handled FDO 47164 but need input to see if we'll actually implement.
> >
> > Summary: User thinks that re
Hi All,
I'd like to make a meta bug for functions that Excel has but that aren't
currently supported or are problematic in Calc. This stems from FDO 47164:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47164
The user has been nice enough to make a list, I can go one by one and
verify that Calc isn
There is some repetition of code in the patch because I had to separate the
recent documents hotspot from the recent documents symbol -- before they
were both held within a single rectangle which caused problems when trying
to increase the size of the hotspot. If there's something better that I can
2012-07-11 15:53:07 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> > I'd like to make a meta bug for functions that Excel has but that aren't
> > currently supported or are problematic in Calc. This stems from FDO
> 47164:
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47164
>
ul 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Friday, 2012-07-13 09:00:28 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> > I closed the bug as INVALID and put a comment on there. I also will move
> > the list to the wiki, not sure where it's preferred to go or if I'
5+ functions,
I found a total of 14.
Thanks again,
Joel
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Tuesday, 2012-07-17 08:36:22 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> > I've started the page. You can find information on the Calc development
>
Sure thing. I'll try to fix it tonight. As for the magic numbers, I agree,
the original way it was done just wasn't good in my opinion and made fixing
it hard and partly redundant. It might take me an extra day or two because
I might try to make it a bit cleaner than it currently is. The original
c
Patch #2, think this one is much cleaner. Feel free to comment, next patch
I'll submit through gerrit, late and didn't want to learn about it at
midnight ;)
Joel
0001-fdo-47164-Increased-size-of-hotspot-box-for-recent-d.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi All,
Before I push this (which I will do tomorrow). I want to get preference
opinions if possible. Here is the bug report:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43518
I tend to agree with the complaint (although it's incredibly minor).
Technically "between" should not include the minimu
It's been a long time since the default install has worked for me on any
Ubuntu or Ubuntu based distro. I always have to add --disable-mozilla in
order for autogen to work. Is this problem being looked into? Without
mozilla we can't use digital signatures which I think is a huge potential
security
Just a heads up to everyone. I'm doing a serious cleaning of bug reports.
Changing a lot to NEEDINFO, RESOLVED, etc...We have way too many bugs
listed as unknown that haven't been touched in months and have been
confirmed to not be an issue or needs updated without updates from original
authors of
Thanks for pointing that out, correction:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43192
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Bankston <
daniel.dev.libreoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 10:58 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Before I push this (whic
Please let me know when I can do the changes. They are really small as it's
just the text and name of one variable.
On Jun 7, 2012 10:43 PM, "Daniel Bankston"
wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 12:31 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
>
>> Hey Joel,
>>
>> 2012/6/8 Joel Made
'm not overstepping, just trying to help as much as possible as it
seems like there is a bit of a back log. If this isn't wanted just let me
know and I'll cease immediately.
Thanks to everyone contributing to this great project.
Joel
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Rainer Bielefel
ussell wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 05:01 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
>> It's been a long time since the default install has worked for me on any
>> Ubuntu or Ubuntu based distro. I always have to add --disable-mozilla in
>> order for autogen to work. Is this problem being loo
AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On 2012-06-07 at 23:49 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> > 1. If there has been a request for information and there has been no
> > response for 30+ days I'm putting NEEDINFO
> >
> > 2. If two or more people have sa
ser but I do think that I'm more than capable of cleaning
this list a lot).
Joel
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Rainer Bielefeld <
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote:
> Joel Madero schrieb:
>
> It would be nice to be able to differentiate for definitely confirmed
>
il.com> wrote:
> Hello Joel, all,
>
> First, a big thank you from me! :-)
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> > 2. If two or more people have said that they do not have the bug I'm
> doing
> > the following if there hasn't been action
The error is ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making core/moz
Happens every time on a Ubuntu machine I believe. What's everyone's opinion
about patching to make mozilla disabled by default and enable an option?
Joel
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Agreed t
page which currently says something about
disabling mozilla if needed.
Joel
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:59 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 08.06.2012 12:52, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:01:31PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
>>
>>>It's been a long
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Bjoern,
>
>Any chance you can handle this ? :-) personally I have no problem
> with
> a default to --disable-mozilla, but - it's interesting that the build
> consistently fails in the other path.
>
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 09:50 -0700, Joel
of us using multiple OS's/distros and disabling it by
default doesn't seem to be that big of an issue.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> I'll get that tonight. Was the patch that was pushed out earlier not the
> default disable mozilla? I'm surpr
The file is over 14 megs, where would you like me to send it?
Joel
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> On 9 June 2012 03:33, Joel Madero wrote:
> > Attached is my build log (I think I included enough to be relevant),
>
> Could you do:
> make moz.clean
>
201 - 300 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
