Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

>This looks like a incompatibility between autoconf-generated "boilerplate" >code and your environment. >Check that configure has been regenerated; >it should says at approx line 3: >"Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.6x" with "2.6x" being the version of autoconf you >installed; It says now "Gener

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:28:18AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > My understanding is as follows: > > - There is a large number of OSL_TRACE calls all over the code base, > producing large amounts of output at runtime. Agreed. > - Nobody wants to see all that output at once. People are gen

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows build breakage

On 23/11/11 04:41, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Hi there, So, not having been able to build master on Windows for almost 2 months, I've decided to give it another go. But it fails in scripting this time, and I have no clue. The build log is attached. Hopefully this will ring a bell for someone... Ko

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

Rob Snelders píše v Út 22. 11. 2011 v 20:12 +0100: > No those days aren't the only way to test. But it is a way to get more > people to test the software and to test the software in ways that the > developers won't think about. > I think there are enough people that want to help but don't know ho

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows build breakage

On 23/11/11 09:27, Noel Power wrote: in my case a (full) clean build solved it has to be said this was on linux though ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] EuroOffice Barcode

Hi LibreOffice Team, I'm Tibor Brenner from MultiRcio Ltd. We are the developer team of EuroOffice software package and extensions. I've written to András Tímár from your team about a request with our Barcode extension, and he suggested to use your mailing list. Since LibreOffice has an online

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:22:40AM +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote: >> This looks like a incompatibility between autoconf-generated >> "boilerplate" code and your environment. > It says now "Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68 for dmake 4.12." > Unfortunately, make still gives the same error messages (w

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows build breakage

On 23/11/11 05:41, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Hi there, > > So, not having been able to build master on Windows for almost 2 > months, I've decided to give it another go. But it fails in scripting > this time, and I have no clue. > > The build log is attached. Hopefully this will ring a bell for so

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows build breakage

Hi I tried to debug this with Michael Stahl's help, and I came to the conclusion that it is some kind of timing bug in make. Sometimes it works, sometimes not. In the end I gave up and disabled java. (--without-java). Regards, Noel Grandin. Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Hi there, > > So, not having be

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On 22/11/11 15:51, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> if the MSVC debug stuff is indeed too difficult, then just comment it >> out, put in a comment that says FIXME, and re-enable the >> --enable-dbgutil stuff, that way windows devs at last get some >> assertions and internal consistency checks. > > But you

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows build breakage

2011/11/23 Noel Grandin : > Hi > > I tried to debug this with Michael Stahl's help, and I came to the > conclusion that it is some kind of timing bug in make. > Sometimes it works, sometimes not. > In the end I gave up and disabled java. (--without-java). --disable-ext-scripting-javascript and --d

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

>So, just to check I understand right, when you say the error messages are "the >same with different line numbers", it means the following? The rror messages are configure: creating ./config,status ./configure: line 6255: test: too many arguments (6 identical lines) configure: error: could not ma

[Libreoffice] sw: serial numbers

hi all, i am currently wondering: in sw, a bunch of classes define serial numbers, e.g. SwIndex, SwNode, etc. in a DBG_UTIL build, there is a global counter, and the ctor increments the counter and assigns its value to a member, so every instance has a unique serial. what is the point of this?

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

On 23/11/11 11:14, Winfried Donkers wrote: > Now I get the following: > > config.status: executing depfiles commands > MAKE version 5.2 Copyright (c) 1987, 2000 Borland > Error makefile 871: Colon expected you shouldn't be using Borland make :) > *** 1 errors during make *** > make: *** [dma

Re: [Libreoffice] how to print into .ps

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:30 +0100, Németh László wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe you can change the printer language to Postscript on the Device > page of the Printer settings in the Printing dialog (it works for me > on Linux). > > By the way, there is an important difference within PDF printing and > PD

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 17:52 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > See also > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2c46cde2edf25e8c9ae6f591b52a6b7c086fe166 > for another place where support for C++11 is used. That's just a little workbench program that I stuck together to (somewhat

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 15:14 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > - It is "obviously" correct, independent of the bug. Yes, indeed. Pushed to 3-4 now. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:14:33AM +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote: >> Then, I'd like to look at the values of "$ac_delim_n" and >> "$ac_delim_num"; > result is (appart from error messages as above) 6 times > * ac_delim_n: 'File STDIN: > '8 lines match > * ac_delim_num: 'File STDIN: > '8 li

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

On 22/11/11 16:45, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 15:14 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> Attached patch solves (according to user report on master daily build) >> fdo#36555, a severity "critical" bug which keeps users from connecting >> to ADO / OLE DB datasources. > > Wo

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On 11/23/2011 10:05 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: Then forget the patch, all we need is to update http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_debug#Useful_macros to reflect that now SAL_LOG controls OSL_TRACE messages, not dbglevel> 1. Thanks for the pointer. I will update that wiki page.

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

Hi Petr, Petr Mladek wrote (23-11-11 10:28) All in all I would say it is needed to organise these events.. I fully agree. I was just a bit scared by Cor's mail. It made me feel that Janury 21 would be the only day when people should test LO-3.5. I am happy to hear that it is not true. :-) I

Re: [Libreoffice] sw: serial numbers

On 11/23/2011 11:16 AM, Michael Stahl wrote: in other words, any reason why i shouldn't remove serials? ...because you do not want to become a serial killer? ;) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.o

Re: [Libreoffice] LO and address book wizard

Le 21/11/2011 17:39, Arno Teigseth a écrit : Hi Arno, Anyone else having trouble with adding address books to Libreoffice (File->Wizard->Address book). I'm getting "SDBC error" on my system, _git master LO_ on linux mint 11. Have both thunderbird (repo) and evolution (repo) installed. The "m

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

Hi Lionel, On 2011-11-22 at 17:52 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Kendy, would you consider having your MinGW tinderbox compile with > -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x? That would ensure coverage of Windows-only > code. I tried, but there were several places that were broken. After I found out tha

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

Maybe we need a check in configure to make sure we are running the correct version of make? Michael Stahl wrote: > On 23/11/11 11:14, Winfried Donkers wrote: >> Now I get the following: >> >> config.status: executing depfiles commands >> MAKE version 5.2 Copyright (c) 1987, 2000 Borland >> E

Re: [Libreoffice] help asked/offered for bug 36555

>So it does *not* output: > File STDIN: 5 lines match No, it did not. >Then I think you (from your shell) and ./configure use a different grep, and >the grep that ./dmake/configure uses behaves differently than expected: >configure expects that "grep -c FOO" outputs JUST the number, but the grep

Re: [Libreoffice] Setting up a non-intrusive build cluster

Working on that... it looks simple, but the code isn't giving me what I expected... /me grumbles looking at unknown APIs... Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything." -James 1:4 http://asimplediscipleslife.blogspot.com/ m

Re: [Libreoffice] Bug 38811 - [EasyHack] default to SQLite not HSQLDB in Base

Hi Mohsin, Of course, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38811 is a great place for some pointers on this topic; but I prefer E-mail for its friendliness and ease; so - first, welcome ! On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 19:10 +1100, Mohsin Mansur wrote: > I am interested in writing the SQLi

Re: [Libreoffice] compiling with C++0x support

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:27:20PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > On 2011-11-22 at 17:52 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> Kendy, would you consider having your MinGW tinderbox compile with >> -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x? That would ensure coverage of Windows-only >> code. > I tried, but there

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] i18n corrections for pt-PT

Hi Olivier, On Tuesday, 2011-11-22 14:29:56 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > I will provide anothe patch. Please wait. Not necessary anymore. I resolved that by changing the attachment's Conten-Type charset to utf-8 before saving, in fact the data was correct, but declared wrong. > >However, thes

[Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

So, While the discussion on logging goes on; I knocked up a little test to compare the difference between a couple of styles of string creation, orthogonally for eg. exception message construction. One of LibreOffice's -big- problems is size: we're too big. There are lots of reaso

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] remove NfShCurrencyEntries and NfShCurrencyEntryPtr types

Hi Eike, thanks. All my patches are contributed under LGPLv3+ and MPL 1.1 licenses. Best regards, Daniel Original-Nachricht > Datum: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:03:38 +0100 > Von: Eike Rathke > An: Daniel Di Marco > CC: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org > Betreff: Re: [Libreoffice]

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEWED 3-4] fdo#36555 connect to ADO (MS Access, ...)

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 11:47 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > > Wow - nice chasing, as you say - obviously correct, I've pushed it to > > libreoffice-3-4; good to get fixed. > > i was just going to write a mail that you had in fact pushed it to > Branch 'feature/sqlite', but now i see Caolan has

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > and I know var-args is type-unsafe, Don't all of the major compilers have extensions for compile-time checking of printf-style strings? Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOff

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] remove NfShCurrencyEntries and NfShCurrencyEntryPtr types

Hi Daniel, On Wednesday, 2011-11-23 13:58:56 +0100, Daniel Di Marco wrote: > thanks. All my patches are contributed under LGPLv3+ and MPL 1.1 licenses. Great, would you like to add yourself to https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers and for the license reference use http://lis

Re: [Libreoffice] compiling with C++0x support

>> After I found >> out that M_PI is not defined when you build with -std=c++0x, I kind of >> lost interest for now ;-) Welcome to the world of multiple implementations of standards. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org h

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

On 11/23/2011 01:59 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Given that the real per-site difference is larger. Add to this the issue that there are real translation problems with the 2nd approach (that it cannot be appropriately re-ordered), and IMHO the argument here is overwhelmingly against 'cute' op

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

>  "Value is %" SAL_PRIdINT32, n (presumably n here is then sal_Int32?) On which of the platforms that we support is %d not a proper format for sal_Int32? Even in the unlikely case that on some platform int indeed is larger (for instance 64 bits) than sal_Int32, won't the usual conversions take

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

On 11/23/2011 02:36 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: On which of the platforms that we support is %d not a proper format for sal_Int32? On all those that use typedef signed long sal_Int32; Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Some OSL cleanup

Hi Caolan, On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 22:17 +0100, Arnaud Versini wrote: > * Linux kernel version 2.6.18 or higher; -> clone() for NTPL > * glibc2 version 2.5 or higher; -> NPTL IIRC you did some work on nailing down our Linux minimum base-line. How does this compare vs. the above

Re: [Libreoffice] {LibreOffice] bug 34425 hints asked

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 07:52 +0100, Winfried Donkers wrote: > You made bug 34425 an easy hack; I would like to give it a try, but > can you give me a hint where I can find the relevant code for these > buttons (in scalc and swriter)? Found Bjoern had replied to this mail in the bug ;-)

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows build breakage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Noel Power wrote: > On 23/11/11 09:27, Noel Power wrote: >> >> in my case a (full) clean build solved it > > has to be said this was on linux though Well, that was a full clean build when I saw that error message. Each time I build on windows I do a full clean bu

[Libreoffice] REMINDER: Release 3.5.0-beta0 from master

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 3.5.0-beta0 is on Monday, November 28, 2011. The main purpose of this build is to make sure that we are able to produce usable builds in release configuration. Please, do you best to keep master buildable and usable. Note that the feature freeze and t

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

> On all those that use >  typedef signed long sal_Int32; Ah, but it still *works*, doesn't it? int is *also* 32 bits on these platforms, isn't it? But yeah, I guess you do get a warning from gcc. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.fr

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:59:00PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > The attached test contrasts: > fprintf (stderr, "P is %s and b is %d\n", p, b); > vs. > std::cout << "P is " << p << " and b is " << b << "\n"; > Given that the real per-site difference is larger. Add to thi

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows build breakage

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi > > I tried to debug this with Michael Stahl's help, and I came to the > conclusion that it is some kind of timing bug in make. > Sometimes it works, sometimes not. > In the end I gave up and disabled java. (--without-java). Yup, in the en

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

On Wednesday 23 of November 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > I know C++ doesn't like var-args, and I know var-args is type-unsafe, > and thus per-se 'evil' :-) but it also happens to be really easy to use > & read, better to translate, very familiar to most developers, and ... ... and they abor

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] SwSelBoxes: svarray -> std::map

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 18:32 +0900, Daisuke Nishino wrote: > Hi, > > This patch makes SwSelBoxes derived from std::map, getting rid of use > of SV_DECL_PTRARR_SORT. > The patch is available under LGPLv3+/MPL. Phew, this is a real big patch. Looks ok to me, though always tricky to get these convers

Re: [Libreoffice] sw: serial numbers

On Wednesday 23 of November 2011, Michael Stahl wrote: > hi all, > > i am currently wondering: > in sw, a bunch of classes define serial numbers, e.g. SwIndex, SwNode, etc. > > in a DBG_UTIL build, there is a global counter, and the ctor increments > the counter and assigns its value to a member, s

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Some OSL cleanup

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:48 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Caolan, > > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 22:17 +0100, Arnaud Versini wrote: > > * Linux kernel version 2.6.18 or higher; -> clone() for NTPL > > * glibc2 version 2.5 or higher; -> NPTL > > IIRC you did some work on nailing d

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Lionel Elie Mamane changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||40447 --- Comment #28 from Lionel E

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Enable :first-letter CSS pseudo-class for all browsers in HTML export

Hi Harri, On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:39 +0200, Harri Pitkänen wrote: > Previously when drop caps were specified in a paragraph style (not > as direct formatting) export to HTML was implemented with :first-letter > pseudo-class for "LibreOffice Writer" and through styling individual > characters for

Re: [Libreoffice] Solving an introduced runtime dependency on unreleased Qt version (KDE4 vcl backend)

On Tuesday 22 of November 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 18:26 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > Since 3.4 at least, when run with KDE4 integration, LO kind of happens > > to have a runtime dependency on a yet unreleased Qt version, otherwise LO > > will abort during some reasonabl

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Fix bug in build.pl option parser

Hi Daisuke, On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 17:51 +0900, Daisuke Nishino wrote: > I'm not much familiar with perl, but I think the previous > implementation of build.pl had bugs. You're quite right, and your version looks nicer too :-) Thanks for that, I just pushed it. Incidentally, it'd

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

On 11/23/2011 02:52 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: On all those that use typedef signed long sal_Int32; Ah, but it still *works*, doesn't it? int is *also* 32 bits on these platforms, isn't it? But yeah, I guess you do get a warning from gcc. Yes you do. For real-life problems with printf-style

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] i18n corrections for pt-PT

Hi Eike You must have received a file from Sergio Marques, of Portugal. I was in touch with him and the correct data is in the file he sent you. Can you revert my patch and apply his? Thanks you Olivier Em 23-11-2011 10:55, Eike Rathke escreveu: Hi Olivier, On Tuesday, 2011-11-22 14:29:56

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hack regex compile infinite loop ( bug 41738 )

Hi Karl, Seems that nobody has noticed your message: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-November/020211.html You should always use [PATCH] in your Subject when sending patches to the list to get needed attention from developers. -- Kind regards Niko, who is not a developer

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

On 11/23/2011 02:53 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: Also, more generally, in the face of platform-dependent typedefs of integer types, *I*, for one, never really know which length modifier to use in the format string :-( %d? %ld? Look at how glibc had to solve this issue with an extension length mo

[Libreoffice] QA for tech steering call 2011-11-24 Re: minutes of tech. steering call ...

Hi Michael, Rainer*, Hmm, AFAICR, I'm not a frequent participant of the calls ;-) And tomorrow I'll be busy all day training people with Writer. So short two items via mail: - FYI: I have posted a proposal for some QA actions http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/2011-November/000

[Libreoffice] doubts with UNO API and image size

Hello, I am using the last release of Libreoffice and now after convert some images, I am checking that the images are more bigger old: 640 x 409 new: 800 x 511 Sorry, I don't know the version of the old version. But, my question is: Is possible define custom sizes and custom fonts for this ki

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Docuview code cleanup

Hi Matteo, On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 19:54 +0100, Matteo Casalin wrote: > my name's Matteo and this is my first contribution [attempt] to > this wonderful piece of work, besides "spreading the word". Cool - welcome ! and I'm sorry it took so long to get to reviewing this properly. > Th

Re: [Libreoffice] Solving an introduced runtime dependency on unreleased Qt version (KDE4 vcl backend)

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 15:32 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > It's at least not more broken than having one huge global mutex >:). ;-) not so convinced about that; but yes toolkit threading is quite a fun problem. > And the check seems to exist only in QPixmap and LO's Solar Mutex should > e

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On 11/22/2011 10:50 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: I pushed the proposed changes as and . Any furt

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 40447, which changed state. Bug 40447 Summary: CONFIGURATION: Macro security dialog does not open https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40447 What|Old Value |New Value

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Some OSL cleanup

Hello, Can you send us the result of getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION to be sure we have a posix getpid and getppid ? Thanks in advance 2011/11/23 Caolán McNamara > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:48 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Hi Caolan, > > > > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 22:17 +0100, Arnaud Versini wr

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On 11/22/2011 06:53 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: On Tuesday 22 of November 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 11/22/2011 05:17 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: Does it really matter, when it is used only in debug builds anyway? Debug builds are slower already anyway, and if the cost of generating the output i

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 14:56 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > ... and they abort at runtime with anything that's not a plain type, most > notably C++ strings. :-) > And some of the arguments are rather weak as well, I can get you easy to use > and read, better to translate and similarly sp

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On 11/22/2011 06:01 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: Well, first I do like the ability to use these kind of infrastructures even on release code... ...which I was careful to keep in mind while designing the interface. But for the implementation, I kept it as simple as possible for now. you'd nee

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy hack regex compile infinite loop ( bug 41738 )

Sorry all, I was wrong – Karls later message has been noticed: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-November/020417.html -- Silly Niko ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Some OSL cleanup

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 14:06 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 22:17 +0100, Arnaud Versini wrote: > > > * Linux kernel version 2.6.18 or higher; -> clone() for NTPL > > > * glibc2 version 2.5 or higher; -> NPTL ... > My understanding is that our practical baseline

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Docuview code cleanup

Hi Michael, you were faster than me: I've been playing with that code lately, rewriting all of the ImplDrawSymbol routine and was planning to do the last verifications/cleanups this evening and send it today or tomorrow with also a picture including all of the old symbols and the "new" ones, in b

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice always crashing, so removed it and installed latest one: now won't even open

Unfortunately my LibreOffice install hasn't been working right. My old LibreOffice wouldn't crash, as long as I didn't do anything fancy (Ctrl+X or Zotero->Insert Citation). But I wanted to upgrade in order to stop it from crashing at all. So I uninstalled my old version, removed reg conflicts w

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >>> Second, static data is a problem, as is initialize-once data in a >>> multi-threaded world. >> >> humm ?? initialize _before_ getting to the multithreaded part. > > which a *library* like sal cannot do who said that sal has to auto-init

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On 11/23/2011 05:04 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: who said that sal has to auto-initialized the service. main() explicitly call sal_init_trace_services(char* log_env_descrition) (or whatever) and store the resulting array of logging context

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Some OSL cleanup

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:08 +0100, Arnaud Versini wrote: > Hello, > > Can you send us the result of getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION to be > sure we have a posix getpid and getppid ? getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION NPTL 2.3.4 C. ___ LibreOffice mailing l

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: icc/prj icc/source

On 11/23/2011 05:05 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: icc/prj/build.lst |4 ++-- icc/source/create_sRGB_profile/makefile.mk |2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) New commits: commit ce2a78b4efe5c62d4aa13109401dc820e3891e71 Author: Tomas Chvatal Date:

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> >> If you use a string as a trace-selector you will never get something >> with performance good-enough for release code. >> you need a numeric level and a numeric module/feature selector. >> >> You need a system so that when the trace a

Re: [Libreoffice] message construction bloat ...

On Wednesday 23 of November 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 14:56 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > And some of the arguments are rather weak as well, I can get you easy to > > use and read, better to translate and similarly space efficient without > > var-args. Wanna bet :) ? > >

[Libreoffice] fdo#42924: needs help with "tablehead" xml parsing

Hello Jan, all, Following https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42924, this is an unfinished patch to check whether is empty. Hope I was on the right way :) Anyway, as commented in the code, how can I detect whether that row is "tablehead" or not? Currently I just set role = tablecontent.

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

On 11/23/2011 05:36 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: Seriously ? you need 'numbers' to be convinced that b == 10 is more performant than (excerpt, not taking into account a couple of epilogue/prologue among other things...) [...] Yes, I need numbers to be convinced that the difference is of practi

[Libreoffice] errors in idl files

Hi all, I would like to report a few errors in idl files, see below. Also, is the binary format of the binary rdb files specified and described somewhere? I've been parsing idl files from libreoffice git repository (offapi/ and udkapi/) and hit some issues trying to #include dependencies. The c

Re: [Libreoffice] errors in idl files

On 23/11/11 18:02, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to report a few errors in idl files, see below. > > Also, is the binary format of the binary rdb files specified and > described somewhere? it is described somewhere on openoffice.org... ...but i can't find the well hidden docume

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertions and Logging

>While a central registry of such defines could be useful also for consistency >and to avoid typos, it is the very "central registry" aspect that makes it >look unattractive to me. Sure, but at least the technic I mentionned would allow for us to _choose_ one way or another If you stick with str

Re: [Libreoffice] Question about IAccessibility2

Hi Regina, At 23:11 21-11-2011, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, I have started to implement the attribute "stroke-linecap". I assume this refers to svg:stroke-linecap (§20.164 in the ODF 1.2 spec, which refers to stroke properties in the SVG spec:

[Libreoffice] Need some informations on format attributes

Hello I am the author of the bug number 43067 ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43067 ). I am trying to solve that bug. I tried to insert "rWrtShell.ResetAttr();" just before the "rWrtShell.SetAttr(*pTemplateItemSet);" line. It works but only when I just apply text formatting (hol

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fixed wrong scaling of the anchor icons

Hi , the size of the anchor icons, handles and similar were always one pixel too small which resulted in a blurry image. This should be fixed but I am not sure why 1.0 was subtracted in the first place. Tim -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 1674

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice always crashing, so removed it and installed latest one: now won't even open

Hello, Good thing to have thought about ccleaner to clean the Windows registry but you should retry to uninstall but this time by deleting your LO profile. Then try first with Hebrew, Chinese and Japanese and any extension/custom just to see if it's ok. If it's ok, try to add 1 by 1 your customs

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice always crashing, so removed it and installed latest one: now won't even open

On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 10:14 -0800, julien2412 wrote: > Finally, to get support, you can also connect to the libreoffice and > libreoffice-dev IRC channels (IRC proxy here > http://webchat.freenode.net/) Do note, however, that the dev channel is not appropriate for user questions (which the origin

Re: [Libreoffice] errors in idl files

Hi Tomas, On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 18:02 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > I would like to report a few errors in idl files, see below. It seems mst fixed them already, but thanks ! > Also, is the binary format of the binary rdb files specified and > described somewhere? Hah - that thi

[Libreoffice] Bug 39659 - Java 7 not recognised -- missing or adjustment to distribution specific "vendorInfos" needed for the new Oracle JRE

Can someone double check this. UNO Runtime Environment URE/jvmfwk looks to have Java vendor dependencies for each OS distribution. In libreoffice-ure-3.4.4.2\jvmfwk\distributions\OpenOfficeorg\ The appropriate javavendors_[freebsd|linux|macosx|os2|unx|wnt].xml template gets copied from libr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] SwSelBoxes: svarray -> std::map

I keep getting crashes from one of the subsequentchecks now, suspiciously looking like this patch causes them, but am too tired right now to debug myself: Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x7ff44ad20b3e in SvPtrarr::operator[] (this=0x38, nP=0) at /data/lo/core/s

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] i18n corrections for pt-PT

Hi Olivier, On Wednesday, 2011-11-23 12:39:32 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > You must have received a file from Sergio Marques, of Portugal. Yes, I did. > I was in touch with him and the correct data is in the file he sent you. > > Can you revert my patch and apply his? I should had read your

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] i18n corrections for pt-PT

FWIW, (http://duckduckgo.com/?q=Jan.+Fev.+Mar.+Abr.&kl=wt-wt) I have never seen Portuguese month abbreviations with dots... Em quarta-feira, 23 de novembro de 2011, Eike Rathke escreveu: > Hi Olivier, > > On Wednesday, 2011-11-23 12:39:32 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > > > You must have received

[Libreoffice] how to acquire an ScDocument reference "from scratch"

Hello List, I'm trying to get hold of an ScDocument "from scratch". I have naively attempted to replicate another section of code, but for the life of me can't figure out what I'm missing. My code crashes with a SIGSEGV on this line: aDocShell = new ScDocShell(); I think I've boiled it do

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] i18n corrections for pt-PT

Hi Eike We have discussed Sergio and I and we fetched many references. Month and weekdays names shall be in lower case http://www.portaldalinguaportuguesa.org/novoacordo.php?action=novoacordo-mudanca Abbreviations shall be followed by a dot. http://www.pucrs.br/manualred/abreviaturas.php Pl

[Libreoffice] Problems with mozilla build-tools on WindowsXP

Hi All, I have followed [1] as a guide to build LO on windows. But when I run autogen it comes with "Mozilla build tooling incomplete". I run autogen with the options --with-mozilla-build='/cygwin/c/mozilla-build and --disable-build-mozilla. I have also downloaded the prebuild mozilla modul

Re: [Libreoffice] Setting up a non-intrusive build cluster

I played with the utmp stuff, and it records the shells only, not the interactive sessions... Any method other than the ps trick? (which may break of process names changes...) Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything." -

Re: [Libreoffice] Setting up a non-intrusive build cluster

Quick question... Is GDM the default/standard graphical login in linux distros? If so, I think that this could be good: http://library.gnome.org/admin/gdm/stable/configuration.html.en Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anyt

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 39589, which changed state. Bug 39589 Summary: XLS files saved by Calc all have split window / or give security Warning when opening in Excel (FILESAFE) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39589 Wha

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3-4] Fix for fdo#39589

Hi there, I'd like to have http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0215f8b19451ab67c7fdaf91f2da8298a9b89c47 cherry-picked to the 3-4 branch. It fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39589 which is one of the 3.4 most annoying bugs. Thanks! Kohei -- Kohei Yoshi

  1   2   >