Le 2011-01-30 13:53, drew a écrit :
Hi,
Received a message from a user today regarding the install instructions
within the en_US readme file covering Mandriva:
'Doing commands like "su urpmi *.rpm" won't work; it either has to be
"sudo urpmi *.rpm" or "su -c urpmi *.rpm"'
I have never used Man
Le 2011-01-31 03:08, Marc Paré a écrit :
Here's another routine I am suggesting for the Konsole challenged users
(Mandriva):
1. Download the distro and help files and language pack (if needed).
2. Right click on the .tar.gz and choose extract here
3. You can put/move ALL the .rpms that you nee
* Arno Teigseth schrieb:
> - no one wants to make such a system just for libreoffice
> - it's more work figuring out the problems that probably will arise from
> an "upgrade package" than actually just installing the newer version of
> openoffice.
>
> These would probably be good reasons to give
2011/1/31 ski :
>
> Hi!
> Is there any possibility to build the LibreOffice under the FreeBSD?
> Now I get this error:
>
I am currently writing a ports for libreoffice, it should hit the
ports tree this week (my be next week depending on the testing) it
builds and run fine, I just have to polish
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 03:50:37PM +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Hi
>
> In our effort of replacing deprecated data types from tools/ by std::
> types we would like to use gprof for profiling (to choose the right
> data types). But unfortunately, we don't know to set the -pg flag,
export ENVCFLAG
Hi,
does anyone need this macros? I removed them completely.
-Thomas
>From dfe6fbe864926c8ef29c34681b0425f7aacdca75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Arnhold
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:52:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove DBG_TRACE_BASIC, DBG_SAVE_DISASSEMBLY and sbtrace.hxx
---
basic/source
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:22 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:59 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> > I'm still translating comments and came across a constant named
> > SCID_NEWDOCUMENT. When I asked opengrok the only place where this
> > constant was found was the file reche
Hi David,
Thanks for your review!
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:16:13 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
>> -// OD 09.01.2003 #i6467# - adjust view shell option to the same as for
>> print
>> +// adjust view shell option to the same as for print
>
> We generally want to leave the #iX#-style comme
Hi Alfonso,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 15:10 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been going through the list of identified unused functions in calc and
> commenting out those that don't seem to be used anywhere.
Why don't you simply remove them and check if it still builds?
Regards,
--
Cé
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 14:35 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> So, should i make the changes to the code or have you already done
> them?
Judging by the git log (they're not pushed), I'd say that Norbert
wanted you to re-submit a patch with his suggestions :-)
Looks like some nice cl
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 20:05 -0400, Clio wrote:
> added Russian translation to dictionaries/ru_RU/description.xml
Many thanks for your patch, I just pushed it.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.
Hi Jean,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 13:55 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> No the problem is not there. It is in the long list of useless
> extensions / dictionaries in the Extensions Manager.
> Many users are afraid when they see this list.
Ah ! :-) so - this is something else.
We
Hello Suguru,
Many thanks for taking my last comment in consideration. Your patch was
nice: I simply removed some more instances of "OD" and pushed it. Keep
providing patches like this one :)
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 18:20 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some comments related with revisi
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 20:05 -0400, Clio wrote:
> added Russian translation to dictionaries/ru_RU/description.xml
Well I forgot to ask you... do you agree to push the patch under LGPLv3+
and MPL?
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration develope
Hello Christina,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:29 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> lines already striked out in the list.
Many thanks for your patch. I just pushed it... I suppose you provide it
under LGPLv3+ and MPL as I already saw it in another of your emails, is
that right?
Regards,
--
Cédric
Hello Guillaume,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:51 +0100, Guillaume wrote:
> Can someone explain me why my patch has not been pushed ?
The simple reason is that most of us were on week-end...
> If I were wrong somewhere, I don't want to make the same mistake twice.
> It was my first (really easy/small
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 01:32 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> One binpkg for all distros ?! The whole idea of this is stupid.
>
> > What's the target distro that the universal build on e.g. the website
> > download site should pick.
>
> Trivial: your own microdistro. (prefix build approach, etc).
Hi Lucas,
Many thanks for your patch, I just have pushed it.
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 21:28 +0100, xapantu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch to use gtk vseparator instead of native ones in the
> toolbar, which are just a black line, and doesn't fit with gtk separator
> which can have nice gradients,
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 19:29 +0200, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
> Affected folders:
> offapi/com/sun/star/ucb - offapi/com/sun/star/xml
>
> Fixes many spelling errors (checked with en_US spell checker).
> Unifies spelling of some common words.
Looks good, even Leveinstein->Levenshtein !, heh. Pushed, t
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 20:18 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> OT, but perhaps somebody might know an answer:
>
> is there a way (w/ recent gcc) make forbid the compile fail when
> enums and ints get mixed up (eg. numeric operations or assignments
> from/to int) ?
Well -fpermissive
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 13:01 +, Luke Dixon wrote:
> Some of the tests are the same kind as the one from last time. It can be
> a bit difficult to get the right node tree for the test from the parser,
> which also seems to put in more expression nodes than doing it with the
> cursor, which confu
Hi Francois,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 11:35 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> This patch adds support for DragonFly to bootstrap/configure.in
Great - pushed; though in general, I'd prefer to see a complete port
before we get too much further. If it is BSD-like, I would love to see
us re-use as
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 17:12 +0100, Tobias Rosenberger wrote:
> I translated the German comments in the libs-core repo in connectivity/inc/.
> Changes are available under LGPLv3+/MPL.
Thanks for these, all pushed now. Attachments are easier to work with
than inline patches FWIW.
C.
__
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 20:08 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 16:50 +0100, xapantu wrote:
> > Here is a patch to remove the menu when the alt key is pressed, it is
> > not the case with GTK apps, and is disturbing.
>
> This will also work around the rather horrific hack that
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 04:22 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote:
> under LGPLv3+ / MPL.
Pushed, but please pay attention to:
* Avoid breaking the build with ill-formed comments
* Provide several patches changing twice the same things in the same
files but not 100% exactly in the same way. I had to ma
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:54 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote:
> Hello,
> here's another patch.
> This one is also related with bogus comments.
Pushed as well
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
__
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:58 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> does anyone need this macros? I removed them completely.
I just pushed your patch here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=b214264fbb55b1f33e8a50b42113137178da0125
If anyone complains about the remova
Hello Antoine,
Thanks for your patch. I just pushed it. Feel free to provide other
patches like this one.
BTW, you didn't mention anything, I supposed you were agreeing to
provide the patch under LGPLv3+ / MPL... is that OK?
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundat
Hello Kurosawa-san,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 16:53 +0900, KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found some unused files in libs-gui/sv-tools/ and filters/binfilter/.
> Actually they are not compiled.
> Attached patches remove them.
Many thanks for your patches. I just pushed them. I compiled them an
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:05:27AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 11:35 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> > This patch adds support for DragonFly to bootstrap/configure.in
>
> Great - pushed; though in general, I'd prefer to see a complete port
> before we get
Hello Soeren and Thies,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 18:04 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Now we have replaced tools/list with std::list in ScAddInListener,
> here we used a list, as there is adding, removing, and searching on
> this list, and no clear way to sort the elements. The patch comes in
> three
Hi all,
This is beautiful!
http://www.techdrivein.com/2011/01/impressive-libreoffice-ui-mockups-you.html
LibreOffice will be the best office suite ever seen! :-)
Regards,
Júlio.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://list
Absolutely fantastic!
Brilliant use of all this wasted space in a wide screen while writing in a
portrait page!
This just makes me think how the MS innovative big fat "ribbon" on top was
wasting valuable screen space.
Congratulations to whoever had this brilliant idea.
I hope it is implemented
Hi all,
> Hi all,
>
> This is beautiful!
> http://www.techdrivein.com/2011/01/impressive-libreoffice-ui-mockups-you.html
>
> LibreOffice will be the best office suite ever seen! :-)
>
just FYI:
Paulo is already part of our Design Team :-)
He created the detailed 256px versions (and an updated
Dear Julio,
this is the development mailing list. Please discuss and post this
on other lists, such as discuss@ or marketing@
thanks,
Charles.
Le Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:57:44 -0300,
Júlio Hoffimann a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> This is beautiful!
> http://www.techdrivein.com/2011/01/impressive-libreo
Hi Caolan,
Any chance you could review Petr Gajdos's attached patch; AFAIR you are
a bit of a fontconfig wizard ;-) It is to fix this:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379991
Thanks ! :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Ps
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:11 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> No, simply state the depencies and let the distros handle the rest.
> For old legacy systems, simply create an own micro-distro.
Luckily we have a micro-distro now; complete with our own build system,
and method of packaging; it i
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:44 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> I'm still trying to figure out the autogen.sh stuff and make it use the
> correct paths for libraries; one of the errors I got is really freaking
> me out:
:-)
> Why would LO need to build it own version of Mozilla/Seamonkey !?
Hi Christina,
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 22:25 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
> and how could I find out if a constant like SCID_NEWDOCUMENT is still
> referenced? Or does that require some more experience with the code base?
In general running 'g grep' in the top-level is reliable; althou
Hi Soeren,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 15:50 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> In our effort of replacing deprecated data types from tools/ by std::
> types we would like to use gprof for profiling (to choose the right
> data types).
Oh - fun :-) is a complete expunging of the obsolete types not
p
Hi Baptiste,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 08:35 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/1/31 ski :
> > Is there any possibility to build the LibreOffice under the FreeBSD?
> > Now I get this error:
..
> I am currently writing a ports for libreoffice, it should hit the
> ports tree this week (my be next
Yes. LGPLv3+ and MPL as usual.
Christina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Markus,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 09:54 +0100, Markus Stenzel wrote:
> I can only say, the OpenOffice.org(tm) team did it until 3.3. There aren't
> many
> releases of the package considering the huge amount of work involved in every
> upgrade so they MAY chose to do it once for every language. All
Sorry Charles, this will not happen again. ;-)
Regards,
Júlio.
2011/1/31 Charles-H. Schulz
> Dear Julio,
>
> this is the development mailing list. Please discuss and post this
> on other lists, such as discuss@ or marketing@
>
> thanks,
>
> Charles.
>
> Le Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:57:44 -0300,
> Júl
Thanks.
On 01/31/2011 12:32 PM, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:58 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
>> does anyone need this macros? I removed them completely.
>
> I just pushed your patch here:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=b214264f
Hi there,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 00:28 +0100, Guillaume wrote:
> Hi, I removed some empty lines in few files for my first patch.
> I'll continue if it's ok.
It seems someone pushed this before I could :-) anyhow - thanks again;
and can you confirm you're ok with the LGPLv3+/MPL dual licens
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:30 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> and xml security foo - AFAIR the cert management
> stuff in moz really needs pushing down to NSS, or splitting out.
IIRC the real stuff that xmlsecurity needs is all in NSS, while the only
bit that xmlsecurity needs from MOZ is simply to *f
Hi Tobias,
On 2011-01-30 at 20:56 +0100, Tobias Rosenberger wrote:
> is there a reason why you don't use "git submodule" for managing the
> other repos in the build repo?
The reason is that so far nobody researched that enough, to be able to
judge if it would help us, or not :-) From what I kno
31.01.2011 06:17, Cedric Bosdonnat пишет:
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 20:05 -0400, Clio wrote:
added Russian translation to dictionaries/ru_RU/description.xml
Well I forgot to ask you... do you agree to push the patch under LGPLv3+
and MPL?
Yes, of course.
Thank you.
__
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 21:45 +1000, Steve Butler wrote:
> I haven't had a look at this yet as I thought getting a script to
> analyze the existing thesaurus files would be helpful to get those
> errors looked at.
Nice work with that :-)
> I thought I would discuss your idea abou
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> On 2011-01-30 at 20:56 +0100, Tobias Rosenberger wrote:
>
>> is there a reason why you don't use "git submodule" for managing the
>> other repos in the build repo?
>
> The reason is that so far nobody researched that enough, t
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 14:38 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:30 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > and xml security foo - AFAIR the cert management
> > stuff in moz really needs pushing down to NSS, or splitting out.
>
> IIRC the real stuff that xmlsecurity needs is all in NS
Hi Steve,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 21:43 +1000, Steve Butler wrote:
> The option to build the index at install time was also discussed and
> was the original goal, and has definitely not been ruled out. My
> understanding Michael was not keen to do this on Linux, but keen to
> try it in the Windows
2011/1/31 Michael Meeks :
>
> Heh; could you submit the patches to the list (with suitable "LGPLv3+ /
> MPL" license (if you're ok with that).
>
> If you could glup the clean ones together into one patch: soffice.sh,
> ooinstall, build-ooo can go in as-is; the others need some more po
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 12:46 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> It was a low-hanging fruit; I'll collect patches locally for a while
> until I can get a more complete build.
..
> Sure.
Great :-) thanks.
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ says LO is licensed
> under both LG
Hi Michael,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 18:24 +, Michael Florian Schönitzer wrote:
> Hey, I have found a strange bug. I don't know where there is the right
> place, so I put it here.
Thanks !
> - Opening it in LibreOffice 3.3 under Windows, the window beeing maximized
> => Empty Document
> Sure; so if we look at:
>
> setup_native/source/win32/customactions/shellextensions/registerextension.cxx
>
> It -looks- to me, as if we should duplicate / implement a new extension
Er, no need to implement a new shell extension. What could be done is to
implement a new installer
Hi Jesus,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 15:09 +0100, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> Could someone please review and cherry-pick for libreoffice-3-3 branch
> this commit:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=affa15b894b66b3d12d00ab1ad3c567ade88800e
Quick sanity check, and pushed i
Hi Andras,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 15:13 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> Please review them and cherry-pick to libreoffice-3-3.
Thanks ! I read all the integration points, and everything look great
to me :-) [ though I can't say I read all of the dictionaries fully ;-].
Any chance you
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:18 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Or to some other project, dedicated to generic Windows packaging.
> (cygwin folks already have done a lot in this area, so that'd
> be a good starting point).
Aha I didn't know that existed. As long as the "user experience" isn't
deteriora
Hi there,
The appended should save us ~10Mb of install size on Windows (and
perhaps elsewhere too) - I'd love to get it onto the libreoffice-3-3
branch.
Thanks,
Michael.
diff --git a/distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinux.conf.in
b/distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinux.conf.
Has there been any resolution to this?
Thanks,
Dave
On 29-Jan-11, at 12:18 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:06 PM, David Dumaresq
wrote:
On 2011-01-28, at 12:03 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 09:59 -0800, David Dumaresq wrote:
On 2011-01-28, at 4:0
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
> Has there been any resolution to this?
>
I bisected the problem to
libs-gui:ef70418ebf8b32f2d10abce61c0aa2c1011ced14
I'll let Joe decide how best revert/fix (since there may be more than
one commit involved to revert properly)
Norbert
Hi all,
Here are the first patch for freebsd support :
I splitted them corresponding to the different git and prefix them
with the git repository name.
Of course those patches are in any license you want that best fits your needs :)
The other patch are not included as they need more work, and I
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:05 -0800, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
> Has there been any resolution to this?
Yes ! Norbert just finished an amazing binary chop that brought it back
to commit:
libs-gui:ef70418ebf8b32f2d10abce61c0aa2c1011ced14 (a remove DECLARE_LIST
in rsc)
Which see
Le lundi 31 janvier 2011 à 11:23 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat a écrit :
> Hello Guillaume,
>
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:51 +0100, Guillaume wrote:
> > Can someone explain me why my patch has not been pushed ?
>
> The simple reason is that most of us were on week-end...
>
> > If I were wrong somewhere
Hi,
I'm not really sure about this.
There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice
copyright notes. They could be removed, could they?
-Thomas
>From b93f098328afb2cf3ad420bfef45dacbdd7d5181 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Arnhold
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:16:09 +0100
Su
Thanks for the update!
Dave
On 31-Jan-11, at 9:55 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:05 -0800, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
Has there been any resolution to this?
Yes ! Norbert just finished an amazing binary chop that brought it
back
to commit:
libs-gui:ef70418ebf8b32f
On 1/31/11, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not really sure about this.
>
> There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice
> copyright notes. They could be removed, could they?
Unless you are the copyright holder for these particular file, I'd say
no, you can't remove copyr
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened during the 4th week in 2011
on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches:
+ master:hot LO-3.4 development
+ libreoffice-3-3: fixes for next LO-3.3.x bug fix release[*]
There are two logs for each branch:
Hi Cedric,
I guess you are right. Keeping the code in there, even if only temporarily,
might not make much sense.
If it's ok to remove the functions from the unused list directly I'm happy to
do
that. I was a bit concerned because some of those functions might be required
at
some point.
In m
> ie. which piece of existing code do we base this on, and where is it ?
Well, the "sellang" custom action is pretty minimal, and is written in very
C-like fashion (as it was I that wrote it, many years ago;). A single entry
point: "SelectLanguage" which is called from msiexec when running the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:27:07PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> Francois: I expect you to google Tor Lillqvist, and think a bit more
> before typing.
I'm sure Tor is a nice fellow; I'm sorry if some of my mails seemed rude,
that was not my intent.
> this does not
> mean it is worthless having
> Does the existing indexing code use LibreOffice libraries? In that case it is
> best to keep it as a separate program which is always installed, and just
> have the custom action run it as a separate process (after putting the
> required directories into PATH so that the libraries the indexing
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Steven Butler wrote:
>> Does the existing indexing code use LibreOffice libraries? In that case it
>> is best to keep it as a separate program which is always installed, and just
>> have the custom action run it as a separate process (after putting the
>> requir
Hi Baptiste,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:49 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Here are the first patch for freebsd support :
Great; thanks pushed them all.
> Of course those patches are in any license you want that best fits your needs
> :)
I'll take that as LGPLv3+/MPL ;-)
> Th
> We can always hide the cmd window, it's easy ;)
You mean *console* window. No cmd.exe involved when running a "console" exe
from a "gui" exe (unless it is specifically cmd.exe that you run), even if a
console window shows up. And indeed, it is trivial to build the program to be
run as a gui e
> I can answer this quickly. The index code is now in git in
> dictionaries/source/idxdict.cpp. It is very simple and uses only STL
> and libstdc++ (in my recollection).
OK, so on Windows it then uses the stlport library shipped with LO (if at all;
I guess it also is possible that all STL code
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> We can always hide the cmd window, it's easy ;)
>
> You mean *console* window. No cmd.exe involved when running a "console" exe
> from a "gui" exe (unless it is specifically cmd.exe that you run), even if a
> console window shows up. And i
On 1 February 2011 06:19, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> OK, so on Windows it then uses the stlport library shipped with LO (if at
> all; I guess it also is possible that all STL code it uses comes from
> headers?)
On Windows why can it not use the native STL available there? Is it
because you need to
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 15:17 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 21:45 +1000, Steve Butler wrote:
> > If the thesaurus is only loaded when the user pops it up, then
> > couldn't mythes be taught to generate its own in-memory index
> > from the dictionary and not bother wi
Hi Michael
On 1 February 2011 01:17, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> Sure - so; in response to user input I suspect we can take a second to
> parse the thesaurus; we have around 20Mb of text to load for en_US;
> perhaps 32Mb is a reasonable upper-bound; it does seem a lot to parse so
>
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 10:21 -0800, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
> Thanks for the update!
Just pushed a fix; the unfortunate random re-use of poorly scoped local
variables made this hard to see in the patch. IMHO we need to be locally
scoping all variables as tightly as possible when we t
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:20 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice
> copyright notes. They could be removed, could they?
Heh, probably not. In this case what you could do I guess is to file a
bug against the inheritors of the StarDivision/S
On 1 February 2011 06:30, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> FWIW, I'm sure Nemeth would be interested if you e.g. wanted to create a
> reimpl of mythes that was faster than the original and perhaps simply
> designate the optimized version the new "mythes" version with an API/ABI
> change :-)
I don't think
I do not have much time right now. So the comments in the file are not
all translated yet.
But every litte bit helps, right? :)
Pascal
>From 6333f7553cac1fc558a5db66ca588a45af85eea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pascal Ullrich
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:38:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Translated
On 31 January 2011 23:14, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> (Hmm, was this message intentionally not to the list?)
An accident, list ccd.
>> So after looking at the wiki I wasn't able to find any instructions on
>> how one would go about building the Windows installer. Are the
>> instructions the same as
Hi all,
this mail announces the second step of our official Design Team
Kick-Off. It is about what we've done so far, and how we did it - thus,
it aims to get everybody "on track" who is interested to join, or to
collaborate.
Current Status of Work and Collaboration:
http://wiki.documentfoundatio
Ok, I wondered because this copyright notice is only inside two files of
hwpfilter. But you're right, they have to the rights on it.
-Thomas
On 01/31/2011 07:30 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On 1/31/11, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not really sure about this.
>>
>> There are some files
Thanks. Filed a bug #33782.
-Thomas
On 01/31/2011 09:44 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:20 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
>> There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice
>> copyright notes. They could be removed, could they?
>
> Heh, probably not. In this
> I could use MSVC2008 express which I already have installed. Would
> the build work over an SMB share?
At least if you used a mapped drive letter it should; don't know if it has been
tried with UNC paths. But performance might suck. (But then, the build time is
horrible otherwise anyway...)
> On Windows why can it not use the native STL available there?
I think it is because of compatibility with existing binary extensions written
in C++ that are using stlport, so LibreOffice itself must keep using it so that
its libraries are compatible with such extensions. So when we can declar
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 10:21 -0800, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
>> Thanks for the update!
>
> Just pushed a fix; the unfortunate random re-use of poorly scoped local
> variables made this hard to see in the patch. IMHO we need to
On 31/01/11 00:32, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> Little bit trickier when putting on a ISV hat and trying to target
>> > all Linux distros
> One binpkg for all distros ?! The whole idea of this is stupid.
> Some of my customers didn't listen to me and tried that at any
> cost, they failed miserably. I h
Michael Meeks wrote:
> We can certainly fix this; primarily by not packing those dictionaries
> as extensions I suspect.
But not packaging dictionaries as extensions will bring LibreOffice back
to the OOo 2.x times in this respect; it won't allow, for instance, that
the user is easily (even automa
Hi Soeren,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 22:33 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here five patches cleaning up in dpsave.hxx/.cxx in sc
> 0001: replacing tools/solar.h data types by sal data types
> 0002: cleaning up spacings
> 0003-0005: replacing String with OUString in the three classes, and
> cha
Forgot to say [PUSHED].
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Michael,
what is the correct way to re-build with the fixes in?
I ran git pull, followed by
./autogen.sh --with-num-cpus=2 --with-max-jobs=2 --disable-mozilla
--disable-systray 'CC=ccache gcc-4.0' 'CXX=ccache g++-4.0'
./configure '--with-num-cpus=2' '--with-max-jobs=2' '--disable-mozilla'
Hullo List (Norbert),
I've finally found some time to get back to LO dev (yay!). But only for
about 10 minutes (boo!). I've checked out the gnumake2.1 branch and
made things the usual way: a successful build.
When I execute make with USE_GMAKE=1, however, I'm getting lots of
'chmod: cannot
Hi,
Currently "Save as Picture" feature in Writer, Impress, or Draw
produces a broken EPS file when I save an image as EPS format.
# Export feature produces a correct file.
Here is a patch to fix this issue.
The patch is under the LGPLv3+ / MPL.
Cheers,
--
KUROSAWA Takeshi
From d9b1a6593bc34cd0
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
