Re: [Libreoffice] ok to use MacPorts for dependencies??

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
On 1/23/11 3:43 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: Hello, can anyone verify whether these steps are valid for building LibreOffice? I'm running with 10.6.6 on a 32 bit Mac. I got off to a bad start building manually and then found this link by searching the archives, so I jumped in and started with Mac

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOS build breakage

2011-01-23 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hopefully this is fixed now. I accidently removed a 'premac.h' and 'postmac.h' definition. -Thomas On 01/23/2011 07:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > components:6ea1497263e15e212d6c42c23e9e8b76d6dc1470 > > breaks the MacOS build: > > Compiling: extensions/source/plugin/base/service.cxx > /Volume

Re: [Libreoffice] dev-install fail for branch feature/gnumake2.1

2011-01-23 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, I use no arguments so my autogen.last is empty. Julien. Le 22/01/2011 21:38, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, After compiling the usual way (so without the USE_GMAKE set to 1), I've got this error with dev-install : T

[Libreoffice] force ixion build to use internal boost

2011-01-23 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi, How can I force ixion to use internal boost for compiling? I got error during compile using Ubuntu 8.04: = Building module ixion = Entering /home/libo32/build/build/libreoffice-3.3.0.3/ixion mkout -- version: 1.8 if [ -f ./unxlngi6.pro/misc/build/ixion-0.2.0.exists ]

[Libreoffice] Question about changing the URL for extensions and templates

2011-01-23 Thread drew
Hi, I was wondering - and yes I am being lazy - does anyone know off the top of their head if it is possible to change which URL is used when the user clicks on the "get more templates" and "add new features.." buttons on the start center and from the extension manager, short of a recompile? Are

Re: [Libreoffice] Question about changing the URL for extensions and templates

2011-01-23 Thread drew
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 09:03 -0500, drew wrote: > Hi, > > Are those URLs stored in a configuration file that can then simply be > updated? > Ok - found it: main.xcd - extensions and templates brand.xcd - dictionaries In case anyone wonders why (doubtful..*smile*). Looking at a few school dis

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Updated Serbian translation

2011-01-23 Thread Andras Timar
2011/1/23 Goran Rakic : > У нед, 23. 01 2011. у 08:05 +0100, Andras Timar пише: > >> This patch does not apply cleanly on the current files. > > I made a patch against master branch, attached is the updated patch > against libreoffice-3-3. Do we need to push both? > Hi Goran, I pushed it to libreo

Re: [Libreoffice] ok to use MacPorts for dependencies??

2011-01-23 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > On 1/23/11 3:43 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: > 1. coreutils (from MacPorts) You don't need those at all > 2. pkgconfig (from MacPorts) You don't need this either [1] > 3. automake (from MacPorts) You definitely don't need that

Re: [Libreoffice] ok to use MacPorts for dependencies??

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Christian can you update the wiki please as it has a lot of stuff which as your saying isn't needed. On 1/23/11 4:28 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi *, On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: On 1/23/11 3:43 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: 1. coreutils (from MacPorts) You don'

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice - Scrolling in Writer while focus is on a comment

2011-01-23 Thread Borivoje Petrovic
Yesterday I noticed a rather annoying behaviour of LibreOffice Writer. Namely, when the pointer focus is on a comment, the document is unable to scroll. Instead it tries to scroll the comment. It would be more useful if comment got focus only on mouse over. The way it is, it requires a click on the

Re: [Libreoffice] [tdf-discuss] Linux distros and LibO packaging

2011-01-23 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Besides that, distros will have to continue libreoffice-build, which does > > still contain patches. (Removing those would be a big regression about > > what we ship right now) Thanks. So some distributions

Re: [Libreoffice] [tdf-discuss] Linux distros and LibO packaging

2011-01-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 07:13:56PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > Besides that, distros will have to continue libreoffice-build, which does > > > still contain patches. (Removing those would be a b

[Libreoffice] PATCH: Removal of last extral lines in genericfilter.cxx

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached please find my patch for the removal of 2 extra lines which i forgot to remove with my first patch which i submitted. >From a5e6ed753aa02139aa2e9ddc481a929f9ee7b8c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jonathan aquilina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:51:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] removed double spac

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Some comments and basic cleanup in sc

2011-01-23 Thread Soeren Moeller
Hi Attached four patches: 0001: adding comments to ScFunctionMgr and ScFunctionList in sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx 0002: removing duplicate implementation of ScFunctionMgr::fillLastRecentlyUsedFunctions 0003: adding comments to ScFunctionCategory in sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx 0004: cleaning up comments and spaci

[Libreoffice] PATCH: removal of extra lines in IDocumentFieldsAccess.hxx

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached find a patch to remove extra lines in IDocumentFieldsAccess.hxx >From f997d5451e4893a68a4a5b1c3bb779bf060912f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jonathan aquilina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 21:43:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] removed extra lines in file --- sw/inc/IDocumentFieldsAccess.hxx | 22

[Libreoffice] PATCH: removal of extra lines in attributeoutputbase.hxx

2011-01-23 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Attached please find the patch for attributeoutputbase.hxx to remove extra lines :) >From 5fffeca158bd90c63027c88ad0ae84a982749306 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jonathan aquilina Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:02:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] removal of extra lines --- sw/source/filter/ww8/attributeout

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOS build breakage

2011-01-23 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Hopefully this is fixed now. I accidently removed a 'premac.h' and > 'postmac.h' definition. Yep, that seems to have done it, thanks. Norbert > > -Thomas > > On 01/23/2011 07:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> components:6ea1497263e15e212d

Re: [Libreoffice] ok to use MacPorts for dependencies??

2011-01-23 Thread David Dumaresq
On 2011-01-23, at 7:28 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Aquilina > wrote: >> On 1/23/11 3:43 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: > >> 1. coreutils (from MacPorts) > > You don't need those at all > >> 2. pkgconfig (from MacPorts) > > You don't need th

Re: [Libreoffice] ok to use MacPorts for dependencies??

2011-01-23 Thread David Dumaresq
On 2011-01-23, at 12:16 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > On 1/23/11 3:43 AM, David Dumaresq wrote: >> >> Hello, can anyone verify whether these steps are valid for building >> LibreOffice? I'm running with 10.6.6 on a 32 bit Mac. >> >> I got off to a bad start building manually and then found th

[Libreoffice] Announcement: StarOffice file-format not available any more for saving

2011-01-23 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hello, from now I have started to delete within binfilter the code allowing to *save* using the StarOffice file format. The import (read) is still possible and will remain. Bye bye saving sdw, sxw This will of course not happens in one go... With this push, I have done the following changes:

Re: [Libreoffice] Break Failure with Application::ShowHelpStatusText()

2011-01-23 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:28:11AM -0800, Joseph Powers wrote: > It looks like this wasn't removed from some of the test code in > bootstrap/automation/util. I need to go to work and wont be back home until > late Saturday so, so I don't have time to fix. Just wanted to give someone a > heads up