On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:17:39PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> > A localizer found a reference to Sun Microsystems in a .desktop file on
> > Linux.
> > Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33191
> > Commit (ma
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:00:47PM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning on oox
Pushed, thanks!
>
> In the file :
> oox/source/drawingml/chart/objectformatter.cxx
> in the line 930, there is this function
> void EffectFormatter::convertFormatting( Pro
Only the bad ones :)
And we don't want LibreOffice to be like them, do we? ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Leftovers-tp2269442p2271080.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice
Looks good to me, except that I would prefer to use the full "LibreOffice" name
spelled out in our preferred CamelCase form in all cases, even where OOo uses
lowercase "openoffice" or even (the horrible) "soffice". We don't need to
follow those historical precedents.
Anyway, with or without tha
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 07:18 +0100, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
> OK for 3-3-0.
Pushed to 3-3-0.
Thanks guys,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
> Great work, but out of curiosity wouldn't it be better to use cmake
> instead since we are cross compiling for different platforms?
No, it wouldn't. And we are not cross-compiling. (Yet. And when we will, using
cmake would be a liability, not an asset. Just ask Fridrich.)
--tml
___
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:20 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Great work, but out of curiosity wouldn't it be better to use cmake
> instead since we are cross compiling for different platforms?
In short: no :-)
A longer answer would be - that all the sensible altern
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:09 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Whats being done to prevent spam on the mailing lists?
We've added the list address to CyberPromo's award winning mailing
list ;-)
I guess - the thing that is blocking spam, is the presence of a set of
list moderators
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:09:33AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:20 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Great work, but out of curiosity wouldn't it be better to use cmake
> > instead since we are cross compiling for different platforms?
>
> In sho
Hi there,
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:53 -0800, plino wrote:
> After uninstalling LO RC3, I noticed there are a few leftover files under
> Program Files\Libreoffice 3 and keys in the registry in HKLM if LO is
> installed for All users and in HKCU if it is installed for Current user
> only. The files/
Hi there,
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 04:12 -0800, plino wrote:
> Michael, please don't regard this as a personal complaint.
I take all bugs very personally ;-)
> I think it's a bad idea to cause grievance to users who are giving it a go.
> IMO it will make them stick to OOo...
So - I
You mentioned incremental updates. how is this done. does LO have an
update menu item that will check an update repository and apply the
updates, or is a whole reinstall necessary?
On 01/17/2011 10:33 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi there,
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 04:12 -0800, plino wrote:
Michael,
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:45 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> You mentioned incremental updates. how is this done. does LO have an
> update menu item that will check an update repository and apply the
> updates, or is a whole reinstall necessary?
That is platform dependent;
Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:09 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > Whats being done to prevent spam on the mailing lists?
>
> I guess - the thing that is blocking spam, is the presence of a set of
> list moderators with lots of time, willing to sift and/or approve
> legit
Hi there,
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 23:20 +0100, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> This commit fixes the problems with file associations when you have
> OOo and LibO installed side by side on Windows.
Great - thanks for testing this ! I'm worried though that this may only
fix one side of the problem.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|32939 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|32960 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33088
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
Prevention is the best policy IMHO how intensive is a Spam filter like
spamassassin. i know someone who has it setup and it filters 1000 emails
a min.
On 01/17/2011 11:01 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:09 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Whats being
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 01:23 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1)
> When I run ./autogen.sh with --enable-ext-FOO, it complains that
> extension is not there and asks me if I have downloaded the -ext
> tarball. But
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build
> is rather m
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33105, 33135
--- Comment #70 from Michae
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 12:44 -0600, Ed Dean wrote:
> Trying to keep up with the changes a little better by sending smaller
> files. Hope I didn't mess up this diff as I'm new to git, and I had
> to stash to pull in some upstream changes. Please review!
>
> This is my first attempt at the sc/sourc
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:09 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>> > Whats being done to prevent spam on the mailing lists?
>>
>> I guess - the thing that is blocking spam, is the presence of a set of
>> list mode
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 18:55 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cppcheck said that
> > [impress/sd/source/ui/func/fusnapln.cxx:186]: (error) Possible null pointer
> > dereference: pPV
> which is, at a glance, worth noting.
> It would be great if someone shows the de-referenceing has no problem,
>
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:07 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in ucb
> Compiling was ok
Pushed the first part.
For the second one, that one in gio is a false positive, it's only
compiled with you do --enable-gio, which is probably why it compiled
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 11:51 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On another note, is there an automated test suite? If so, I'd love to
> > know how to kick it off after I make changes.
:-)
> a) we have some build-time cppunit tests that run always during the
> build, e.g. building sc will
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 23:15 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have replaced String with OUString
Kohei will probably look at this one, but
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listi
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 23:15 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have replaced String with OUString,
Kohei will probably look at this one, but
- String aDefArgNameValue(RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM("value"));
+ ::rtl::OUString aDefArgNameValue
= ::rtl::OUString::createFromAscii("value");
+ ::
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Bug 31865 depends on bug 33135, which changed state.
Bug 33135 Summary: No import filter for binary StarOffice formats available
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
What|Old Value |New Value
--
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 23:32 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Another of those places in code the that assumes C long == 32 bit
> integer. These four variables are used to give default values to
> properties WindowTop, WindowLeft, WindowWidth and WindowHeight:
>
> nY = i_rTableWindowSettings.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Bug 31865 depends on bug 33105, which changed state.
Bug 33105 Summary: LibO localization not applied to RC3 .deb and Mac version
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33105
What|Old Value |New Value
-
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:46:57PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 23:32 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Another of those places in code the that assumes C long == 32 bit
>> integer. These four variables are used to give default values to
>> properties WindowTop, WindowLe
Sure, no problem ;)
Leftover files/folders
C:\Program Files\LibreOffice 3\share
C:\Program Files\LibreOffice 3\share\prereg
C:\Program Files\LibreOffice 3\share\uno_packages
C:\Program Files\LibreOffice 3\share\prereg\bundled
C:\Program Files\LibreOffice 3\share\prereg\bundled\registry
C:\Progra
Hi,
would you please review attached patches for 3-3-0 - they're
extracted from OOo's calc65 CWS, which'll go into RC10.
Both are tested & work fine for me - they're safe in a sense that
they'll definitely not make matters worse. ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
changeset: 274229:e8ffb0039660
user:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Peter Lairo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|peterla...@gmail.com|
--- Comment #71 from Peter Lairo 2011-01
In my honest opinion its better to take preventative anti spam measures
now, if the domain starts sending out spam emails you'll have domain
black listing issues.
On 1/17/11 1:03 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33108
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Petr Mladek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|33151 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freed
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:18 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Well caught, I missed it. Well, we have to make these three places
> agree. As to whether it is in the direction of "C/C++ long" everywhere
> or in the direction of "uno long == sal_Int32" everywhere, frankly I
> don't have enough overv
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:45 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> would you please review attached patches for 3-3-0 - they're
> extracted from OOo's calc65 CWS, which'll go into RC10.
..
> Both are tested & work fine for me - they're safe in a sense that
> they'll definitely not make matters worse. ;)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
tbehr...@novell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|32964 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
I 2nd unit testing. I use it a lot when doing programming in Java. I
agree its a great way to test out ones logic before working with the code.
Michael I think in this regard though things will be harder as a lot of
code has already been implemented. If one isn't familiar with the
already impl
Hi,
Lubos fixed an ugly crasher in vcl via fdo#33108 - I've stripped the
patch down to the absolute minimum, and would be ok for taking that
for -3-3-0 - any further reviews, please?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
diff --git a/vcl/unx/inc/salgdi.h b/vcl/unx/inc/salgdi.h
index ef7cf8c..e47c24a 100644
--- a/
On 01/17/11 04:16, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:07 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in ucb
>> Compiling was ok
>
> Pushed the first part.
>
> For the second one, that one in gio is a false positive, it's only
> compiled wit
Hi Michael,
On 2011-01-14 at 11:34 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> IMHO we should excise this; and/or add an easy hack to do so, but
> wanted to check first if our tinderboxen use this [ I assume not, and
> that there is a wrapper around the entire build process that
> incrementally sends fra
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 18:51 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Lubos fixed an ugly crasher in vcl via fdo#33108 - I've stripped the
> patch down to the absolute minimum, and would be ok for taking that
> for -3-3-0 - any further reviews, please?
And again, one approval from me for this - th
On 17/01/11 09:11, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:09 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>> Whats being done to prevent spam on the mailing lists?
>
> We've added the list address to CyberPromo's award winning mailing
> list ;-)
>
> I guess - the thing that is blocking
Hi Regina,
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 23:23 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
> I use the German LibO RC3 on WinXP and the filters are not there.
Riight - we fixed this bug; having said that Pierre's work should make
the binfilter tolerably small, instead of another handful of megabytes
that the
Hi Pierre-André,
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 23:28 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
> Was pretty easy. As you asked, here patch (0001) for making the
> StarWriter file format input only
So sorry for not reviewing these quicker.
This work looks absolutely lovely; please do push it to
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 11:46 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my first patch. I've removed a few unnecessary comments in a couple
> of
> .../calc/chart2 directories.
Looks good to me, pushed now, thanks for this.
> This was mostly to try the patching and submission process. I'm h
On 17/01/11 20:18, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Right; that is useful - I guess before killing export, we should export
> a load of test documents into those 'orrible formats so we can continue
> to regression test import :-)
I knew all those old CDs would come in handy :-)
Just checked my collec
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 00:28 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> Here are some other patches for calc. Have fun!
All looks good. I had wondered if ESelection had any side effects in its
ctor and dtor that might do something in 0003-cppcheck..., but its just
a POD so looks fine. Thanks for these, all pus
Le 17/01/2011 13:16, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:07 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
Hello,
Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in ucb
Compiling was ok
Pushed the first part.
For the second one, that one in gio is a false positive, it's only
compiled with you
On 01/15/2011 03:43 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
...
> I have made a full build with my patch, so anyone can test it. You can
> download it here:
>
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/193133/LibO_3.3.0rc2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>
> This build is from the current master unstable branch, not the stable
> 3.3,
Thorsten Behrens píše v Po 17. 01. 2011 v 15:45 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> would you please review attached patches for 3-3-0 - they're
> extracted from OOo's calc65 CWS, which'll go into RC10.
>
> Both are tested & work fine for me - they're safe in a sense that
> they'll definitely not make matters worse
Hi all ,
I'm engaging in developing an extension(OXT) for writer which allows users to
* Re-size/Zoom images with different parameters
* Rotate images by 90 degrees (right or left)
* Rotate images from 0 degrees to 360 degrees
* Cro
On 10/21/2010 12:32 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:20:15 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
>> I just compiled current LibO on Linux and I also see the THunderbird
>> address book connection. I select it and what I get when trying to save
>> the database is a dialog box saying:
>>
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 21:57 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Ok. And to respond to Jesse Adelman, there is now the tracker 2479 on
> cppcheck for this.
Oops I stepped on your toes there. I was also logging the test-case as
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cppcheck/ticket/2480
I'll mark one as a dupli
Le 17/01/2011 22:15, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 21:57 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
Ok. And to respond to Jesse Adelman, there is now the tracker 2479 on
cppcheck for this.
Oops I stepped on your toes there. I was also logging the test-case as
http://sourceforge.net/
Hi *,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Michael Meeks
wrote:
>
> Was just poking at smtp code in LibreOffice, and was surprised to see
> the solenv/bin/modules/installer/mail.pm - which (apparently) can mail
> logs out automagically. It looks like it hooks into worker.pm.
Never used that,
On 17/01/11 21:02, lakmal padmakumara wrote:
> You need Java Run Time (JRE) in order to use this product .And as it
> involves some system calls this is more suitable for Windows users( I
> will update with a complete Linux version soon)
> This is still in beta phase with lot of possible improvemen
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> First, make clean; make; make dev-install and test as you normally do
> -- this is to verify that the existing build has not be adversely
> affected --
> and then
> USE_GMAKE=1 make clean
> USE_GMAKE=1 make
> make dev-install
> and tests
>
> Please post the result of your
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 12:32 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:20:15 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
>>> I just compiled current LibO on Linux and I also see the THunderbird
>>> address book connection. I select it and what I get when trying
Hullo,
I now think that this patch (identical to the "quasi" one sent a few days
ago) is the fix for my PostIt cursor vs scroll itch.
If I can quickly expand on this here.
Grepping for all instances of "LayoutPostIts", turns out that it is called
by seven places throughout the entire project
All,
How much effort is there currently to make comments which show up
nicely in doxygen?
Just curious as to how important it is. I generated the documentation
once and it wasn't very helpful (or I was looking in the wrong places
in it.)
Thanks!
___
L
On 01/17/2011 12:59 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 01/15/2011 03:43 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> ...
>> I have made a full build with my patch, so anyone can test it. You can
>> download it here:
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/193133/LibO_3.3.0rc2_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>
>> This build is from the current
On 01/17/2011 05:38 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 01/17/2011 12:59 PM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 01/15/2011 03:43 AM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
>> ...
>>> I have made a full build with my patch, so anyone can test it. You can
>>> download it here:
>>>
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/193133/LibO_3.3.0rc2_Win_x86_install_en-
hello,
there is an error compiling canevas:
the reason: in vcl/inc/vcl/sysdata.hxx
there has been a change at line 125:
-void* pRenderFormat; // render format for drawable
+void* pXRenderFormat; // render format for drawable
This produce the error (see below) in canevas compilation.
Si
I think the biggest question is if its possible to migrate this plugin
away from Java, and into c++ for instance? do we have any guide lines
established to tell devs/extension devs what they should do and what
they should avoid?
On 01/17/2011 10:32 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 17/01/11 21:02, lak
I was cleaning out my Spam folder today and found an additional 7 Spam
emails which gmail (viewed through Thunderbird) caught. there is the
occasional ones that get through the filters, hence they will be
filtered at TDF end before even being sent out. I think that those who
are part of the l
Hi
> If it's an optioonal add-in you're prepared to support, then fine, but
> don't expect it to be accepted into the base LO.
>
IMHO, an external extension is the way to go for such a feature !
do not fear extensions contributors as they may help adding new features
to librO ;)
please also not
71 matches
Mail list logo
