But wouldn't a better name than "block selection" then be "rectangular
selection"?
--tml
P.S. I want a circular selection mode!
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:25 +0800, imacat wrote:
> Yes, there is no l10n dir. Are the above sysui and helpcontent2
> problems related to the missing l10n dir?
Yeah, definitely, that's the problem.
> I thought I only need to do
>
> % ./autogen.sh --with-git --with-num-cpus=2 --with-lang="e
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 23:02 -0600, Jordan Ayers wrote:
> Another performance improvement for the perl installer. This one
> brought my ./bin/ooinstall -l time down from about 4 1/2
> minutes to under 4 minutes.
Oky doky, pushed. My perl foo is low, but the installer did seem to work
as normal f
Hey Thorsten ,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
>
> I had initially intended to reply even earlier, was playing with
> your patch yesterday - sadly, there was much preemption. So here's a
> little intermezzo - great work so far, stuff looks promising!
I understand. There h
Dear people,
The 2 bugs reveals some visual flaw in Tools->Options dialog. They look
annoying for our brand new release, not sure who's interested taking them?
>From my reproducing, this is a general platform problem:
Bug 31944 - VBA Properties not fully displayed
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/sho
Hi Joost,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:28 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote:
> I missed the e-mail about moving from rawbuild to native build, so I
> did remove the old installation.
:-)
> Then I did a new Native Build installation as described on the wiki
> page.
Great.
> make[2]: Enter
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 23:58 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> from config.log to autogen.lastrun, like:
Interesting :-) sounds more sensible; I was curious about the download
script clobbering config.log with some mini configure.
I just split 'fetch' (ie. download) and 'dmake/dmake'
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 18:08 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> hence the section
> Attention ***
Ah - TLDR; etc. sorry.
> If you have an existing setup, _when_ the changes are pushed to master
> and you pull them for the first time, you _HAVE_ to re-do your
> autogen.sh and .
On the old build system I always had to do --without-junit, implying
that I had --with-java.
On the new system I need --without-java or it bombs with "can't find ant"
Sorry - I should have backed up my old devel directory so I could go
back and find out ...
Cheers,
Wol
_
Is this when you run the autogen.sh? if it is, i had an issue with it
bombing on junit. can you try and change in the autogen.sh from /bin/sh
at the top to /bin/bash. that fixed my issue. if thats the case, not
sure where else to turn to isolate this bug..
On 12/02/2010 12:10 PM, Wols Lists wr
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 17:58 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
> Is there something else I can do here to follow up? A report on fdo?
I took care of this for LibreOffice. reading the PDF spec it says that
URIs must be 7bit ASCII, so tweaked to always export anything outside
the ASCII range as URI encoded %XX
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:15 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > The "old" system had --disable-epm in the standard flags. We don't need it
> > because we run make_installer.pl on our own anyway.
>
> OK, so would it be possible to disable epm by default? Given that it was
> disabled by default when we
On 02/12/10 11:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Is this when you run the autogen.sh? if it is, i had an issue with it
> bombing on junit. can you try and change in the autogen.sh from
> /bin/sh at the top to /bin/bash. that fixed my issue. if thats the
> case, not sure where else to turn to isolate t
also might want to pull the latest as it seems from talking to kendy on
irc that he pushed some things to fix it. might want to keep it as is
and pull latest and try with that.
On 12/02/2010 12:37 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 02/12/10 11:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Is this when you run the auto
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:31:53AM +, Michael Meeks
wrote:
> Right - good point; I notice a number of these changes - so I'm working
> through build/distro-config/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf - to switch the
> polarity of the default arguments to match that.
Great. :) I think the only re
On 02/12/10 11:41, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> also might want to pull the latest as it seems from talking to kendy
> on irc that he pushed some things to fix it. might want to keep it as
> is and pull latest and try with that.
No luck. Just done a fresh git clone - whether sh or bash makes no
diff
On 02/12/10 11:45, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:31:53AM +, Michael Meeks
> wrote:
>> Right - good point; I notice a number of these changes - so I'm working
>> through build/distro-config/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf - to switch the
>> polarity of the default arguments
Hi Christoph,
On 2010-12-02 at 01:37 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
> Kendy, is there anything special within the original HC graphics for the
> StartCenter?
Nothing that special, you can see what OOo used previously eg. here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/artwork/tree/default_images/f
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:10:38AM +, Wols Lists wrote:
> On the old build system I always had to do --without-junit, implying
> that I had --with-java.
>
> On the new system I need --without-java or it bombs with "can't find ant"
ant was always needed when you enable Java.
(just that the old
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:57:01AM +, Wols Lists
wrote:
> > --with-java-target-version=1.5 has to be used manually.
>
> Not so sure ... see my email about ant.
>
> Just done a completely fresh clone, and the rpm problem has gone but
> it's still bombing because it can't find ant. I'm guessi
(apologies for breaking the thread; I only just subscribed)
I offered an opinion on this excellent little patch to Caolán on IRC,
basically that I thought the last foreach()/chop combo would be better
written as a join. A minor nit, but probably not with much speed
benefit.
The more perlish versi
Hi all,
not sure if the fix it's as originally intended.
Or may be it's completely wrong, 'cause my knowledge of make is rather poor.
beppec56.
--
Kind Regards,
Giuseppe Castagno
Acca Esse http://www.acca-esse.eu
giuseppe.castagno at acca-esse.eu
beppec56 at openoffice.org
>From 7caa044a654130c
So,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:31 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Right - good point; I notice a number of these changes - so I'm working
> through build/distro-config/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf - to switch the
> polarity of the default arguments to match that.
I worked through the abov
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:57 +0100, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> not sure if the fix it's as originally intended.
This is fixed now.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listin
Hi Suren,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 15:35 +0530, surensp...@gmail.com wrote:
> Also is this the right time to apply for the FOSDEM paper or should I
> wait some more time for the patch to mature ?
Wow - it's always the right time to apply for a FOSDEM paper :-) just
whack your name in the wik
(and now I apologise for following up my own mail ;)
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:32 +, Alex Hudson wrote:
> I haven't looked at a huge amount of the installer, but it might be that
> internally using strings less and data structures more could be used to
> speed it up a fair bit: having a look ar
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:32 +, Alex Hudson wrote:
> (apologies for breaking the thread; I only just subscribed)
Great to see you here :-)
> The more perlish version of optimize_list() would probably look more
> like this:
Soo ...
> In general, doing a lot of text o
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:57 +0100, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> not sure if the fix it's as originally intended.
Sorry - that was my fault :-) we can't simply have a rule called
'download' since we have file of the same name in that directory; so I
called the rule 'fetch' but (as always) ed
On 02/12/10 12:12, Michael Meeks wrote:
> --with-ant-home=$BUILDDIR/$APACHE_ANT
> + and have to have a system ant now [ should that be the
> default ? ]
Mmmm... dunno.
There's probably a lot of people like me - not Java developers - who
neither need nor want jav
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:12 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> --disable-epm
Side effect here is that a build in smoketest won't do anything anymore,
as it depends on a big tarball archived install made when --enable-epm
So how about I just change the target in there to use ooinstall to
create the smo
Hi all,
I've fixed fdo#31190, and it looks like something that could be
integrated in 3.3 but before pushing to the branch, I'ld like to have
some peer review.
The patch is attached to the issue.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31190
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
Hi *,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Christoph Noack wrote:
> [...]
>
>> BLK selects (roughly) rectangular blocks (is this useful for anything?)
>
> Concerning the usefulness ... as far as I remember (I had a talk with
> Frank Loehmann, the UX guy, who worked on that feature a few years ago),
>
Hi Wols,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:54 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> configure: error: Ant not found - Make sure it's in the path or use
> --with-ant-home
> anth...@ashdown ~/gitstuff/lotest $
This is down to the change in default configure flags; I suspect you
need something like the original
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:45 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Side effect here is that a build in smoketest won't do anything anymore,
> as it depends on a big tarball archived install made when --enable-epm
Oh - bother :-)
> So how about I just change the target in there to use ooinstall
Is currently -mtune=pentuimpro, FWIW in fedora land we default
-mtune=atom for all our ix86 packages. Might be a good idea to do the
same for the "vanilla" LibreOffice flags ?
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Tor Lillqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|31716 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:45:29PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:12 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > --disable-epm
>
> Side effect here is that a build in smoketest won't do anything anymore,
> as it depends on a big tarball archived install made when --enable-epm
>
> So
Hi Wols, *,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On the old build system I always had to do --without-junit, implying
> that I had --with-java.
>
> On the new system I need --without-java or it bombs with "can't find ant"
Ant is required to build some java-stuff, and was so befor
On 02/12/10 14:09, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Wols, *,
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
>> On the old build system I always had to do --without-junit, implying
>> that I had --with-java.
>>
>> On the new system I need --without-java or it bombs with "can't find ant"
> Ant
2010/12/2 Michael Meeks :
> --with-system-dicts
> --with-external-dict-dir=/usr/share/hunspell
> --with-external-hyph-dir=/usr/share/hyphen
> --with-external-thes-dir=/usr/share/mythes
> --with-dict=ALL
> --without-myspell-dicts
> + are dicti
Hi Thorsten,
would you please review my patch in vcl/source/canvastools? I would like
to push it to 3-3 branch.
Cheers
Radek
commit 67be5829944758dec070710521cd86ae49e00aa9
Author: Radek Doulik
Date: Thu Dec 2 15:23:17 2010 +0100
fix invalid read in doubleSequenceToColor, fixes crash in
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:44 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> There's probably a lot of people like me - not Java developers - who
> neither need nor want java as part of their normal life
Quite - I'll add an easy hack to remove Java from the build :-)
for some value of 'Easy' ... [ at least, I
On 12/02/2010 06:23 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 17:58 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Is there something else I can do here to follow up? A report on fdo?
I took care of this for LibreOffice
Fantastic! Thanks, Caolán.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffic
On 02/12/10 15:04, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 12:44 +, Wols Lists wrote:
>> There's probably a lot of people like me - not Java developers - who
>> neither need nor want java as part of their normal life
> Quite - I'll add an easy hack to remove Java from the build :-)
>
Hi Gert,
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 22:34 +0100, Gert Faller wrote:
> and here is the same for calc (with Hidden=sal_True of course), I've just
> finished the build and the review.
Sorry pardon; after some big and painful thrash trying to get RC1 into
good shape, I finally took a look at this.
So,
As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in
parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented
features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering:
would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ?
[ this is primarily f
would that also fix the issue of LO not finding junit jar and needing to
use --without-junit when running ./autogen.sh?
On 12/2/10 5:33 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
So,
As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in
parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java
Hi Jonathon, Michael, *,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> would that also fix the issue of LO not finding junit jar and needing to use
> --without-junit when running ./autogen.sh?
That is totally different thing. If without-junit is a problem, then
the default of junit
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> So,
>
> As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in
> parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented
> features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering:
>
> would anyone scream i
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:45:17PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >> (without the bogus version dependencies), quicker to compile, and faster
> >> to run (I hope) ;-)
>
> Faste to run? Surely not. Java is only loaded when java-stuff is actually
> used.
Actually observations show it does make
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:34:59PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> would that also fix the issue of LO not finding junit jar and
> needing to use --without-junit when running ./autogen.sh?
It would, but this is no issue. Just install junit4 (and DO WHAT THE
MESSAGE SAYS IF IT STILL DOESN'T FIND
On Wednesday 01 of December 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> ok, so let me elaborate my (maybe extreme) point a bit.
>
> Documentation is a crutch, a feeble attempt to help us mere humans
> to grok big code bases. Good code needs only few comments, because
> it speaks for itself - it may need some m
i'm not worried bout not having junit wasn't sure if junit would have
been affected by --without-java. reason i was having as of last night
was small issue with autogen.sh which kendy kindly fixed
On 12/2/10 5:57 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:34:59PM +0100, Jonathan Aqui
Hi Michael,
This is the end of strace output:
Process 8798 resumed
Process 8799 detached
[pid 8798] --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
Process 8797 resumed
Process 8798 detached
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
open("/usr/share/locale-langpack/en_US.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/make.mo", O_RDONLY
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >> would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ?
>
> I would.
I would not.
> >> [ this is primarily for developers ], should make it easier to build
>
> Come on, what is hard about installing a JDK?
My L
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 23:02 -0600, Jordan Ayers wrote:
>> Another performance improvement for the perl installer. This one
>> brought my ./bin/ooinstall -l time down from about 4 1/2
>> minutes to under 4 minutes.
>
> Oky doky, pushed. My
Hi Sebastian, *;
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> >> would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ?
>>
>> I would.
>
> I would not.
I hope not for the wrong reasons.
>> >> [ this i
Hi Caolan,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:52 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Is currently -mtune=pentuimpro, FWIW in fedora land we default
> -mtune=atom for all our ix86 packages. Might be a good idea to do the
> same for the "vanilla" LibreOffice flags ?
Having consulted Michael Matz, head of
Hi Michael,
could you please review the attached diff before I commit it to the
libreoffice-3-3 branch? I adds your suggested change for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31770 to make the BrOffice
branding optional.
It works like a charm here.
Best Regards,
Petr
--- unotools/source/
Covering impress/animations/source/animcore/ and impress/sd/source/core/*,
sending for review.
Thanks, revol_.
cleancode-impress.two.dirs.diff
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://list
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 21:17 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> could you please review the attached diff before I commit it to the
> libreoffice-3-3 branch? I adds your suggested change for
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31770 to make the BrOffice
> branding optional.
Looks like
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 20:12 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Having consulted Michael Matz, head of our compiler team, and general
> genius; he quoth thusly:
>
> As long as this is restricted to the 32bit version this makes
> somewhat sense.
Yes, should have said as much, only 32b
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 20:31 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Sebastian, *;
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> > My LibO build failed with the included openjdk, gcj, and sun-jre
> > installed, I had to remove openjdk, and then I had to remove the gcj
> > java stuff, an
Caolan, Michael, Miklos,
Could you please have a look at the patch attached to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 ?
I'ld like to push that fix for 3.3 as the bug is a regression introduced
by our rework of the RTF export filter.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
ht
Hi Lubos,
you wrote:
> I'm not asking for anything ridiculous like having a paragraph
> explaining every line, I'm saying that everything non-trivial
> should have at least some documentation
>
Good, then we're mostly on the same page. Then we're both talking
about mission statements, higher-level
Hey Jordan,
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:29 -0600, Jordan Ayers wrote:
> I'm not a perl expert, just have had to learn it on the job over
> the last few years. Since I'm also not very familiar with all the
> details the installer is handling, I've been focusing on incremental
> cleanup items. (A
Radek Doulík wrote:
> would you please review my patch in vcl/source/canvastools? I would like
> to push it to 3-3 branch.
>
Done, thanks for that fix - nasty temporary of a temporary bug.
Signed-off & pushed.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpq0Y33Rt6xE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Radek Doulík wrote:
> would you please review my patch in vcl/source/canvastools? I would like
> to push it to 3-3 branch.
>
Done, thanks for that fix - nasty temporary of a temporary bug.
Signed-off & pushed.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpV2bJa5WSSs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Kayo Hamid wrote:
> Covering impress/animations/source/animcore/ and
> impress/sd/source/core/*, sending for review.
>
Hi Kayo,
many thanks, looks good, committed - two minor tweaks: turned the
first XCommend... hunk into a better comment, and did not remove the
inbetween parts of sd/source/core/
I have made simple HC variants for the start center images
here:http://people.bath.ac.uk/ea2aced/OOo/Backing_HC.zip
Hope that helps,Andrew
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.f
On 02/12/10 19:31, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Sebastian, *;
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ?
>>> I would.
>> I would not.
>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:32:15PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
> I would agree with this. This is my problem with ant - I have java but
> not ant installed, it worked for me on the old system, and it now fails.
Then install it?
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Deve
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:54:50PM +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat
wrote:
> Caolan, Michael, Miklos,
>
> Could you please have a look at the patch attached to
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 ?
>
> I'ld like to push that fix for 3.3 as the bug is a regression introduced
> by our rew
There's a "feature" which I don't think should be present (this here applies
to both formats, odt and doc):
For a multiple-page document, with at least some lengthy notes:
- Place the cursor within a note in the sidebar, and then try to scroll
down the document using the vertical scroll bar eithe
On 02/12/10 23:07, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:32:15PM +, Wols Lists wrote:
>> I would agree with this. This is my problem with ant - I have java but
>> not ant installed, it worked for me on the old system, and it now fails.
> Then install it?
That's what I may well do.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> So,
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:31 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Right - good point; I notice a number of these changes - so I'm working
>> through build/distro-config/LibreOfficeLinuxDevel.conf - to switch the
>> polarity of the defau
hey,
more use of the SAL_N_ELEMENTS macro like replacing the
STATIC_TABLE_SIZE macro.
-- Kenneth
>From 62a94ea8d83b129ef479304865d3f2085b191c32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kenneth Venken
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 01:41:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] more Sal n elements
---
chart2/source/tools/Config
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> So,
>>
>> As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in
>> parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented
>> features into re-writing t
At 11:33am -0500 Thu, 02 Dec 2010, Michael Meeks wrote:
As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in
parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented
features into re-writing them into C++, I was wondering:
would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to -
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:31:02 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >> >> would anyone scream if we defaulted configure to --without-java ?
> >>
> >> I would.
> > I would not
80 matches
Mail list logo
