Re: [Libreoffice] [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal.

Hi Michael, Le 22 novembre 2010 22:07, Michael Meeks a écrit : > >Really, of course - I'd love to have someone working on eg. > > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#don.27t_ship_150_duplicate_placeholder_icons > >Which should be mind-numblingly simple and

[Libreoffice] Greasemonkey script for bugzilla page

Hi, I have made the greasemonkey script required in the easy hacks page. Please set this bug status to be NEEDINFO - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31853, so that I can improve the greasemonkey and resend it ! -- regards Suren Learning < Doing Learn By doing. highlight.user.js De

[Libreoffice] [Spam]:[rft 60] : marketing list for businesses in Canada

Below is a catalog of all our lists and the corresponding prices: note: all lists are optin and sold with unlimited use rights HEALTH RELATED LISTS Any Individual list below $109 ea OR 2 for $179 (Only until Friday) -> Complete US Physicians Database -> Chiropractic Doctors in the USA -> America

Re: [Libreoffice] OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL question

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:24:49AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > Please, don't! The whole purpose of the change was to get more > > manageable debugging output by default, i.e., only assertions. You can >

[Libreoffice] SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

Hello Jonas and list, I started looking at the SmNodeToTextVisitor. There were a few problems I noticed. 1. The Greek and special characters beginning with a % get changed to comments (%%) and then lost. 2. Stacks get ## inserted instead of # for rows. 3. Some of the subs & sups seemed to need ex

[Libreoffice] Remove duplicate 'placeholder' icons

Hi Joachim  Great you want to work on this:  http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#don.27t_ship_150_duplicate_placeholder_icons  There is no need to create multiple sizes for this- defeats the point of being lean!We should just use a 16x16 image. The UI code seems to handle t

Re: [Libreoffice] [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal.

Hi Joachim, On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 09:23 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote: > - wrap current loadImage with something similar to this: > bool found = loadImage(...) > if (!found) { > found = loadImage( default_icon.png ...) > } > return found That sounds fine :-) I suggest we simply remove

Re: [Libreoffice] HC Cleanup

Hi Joseph, On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:18 -0800, Joseph Powers wrote: > While creating the HC Icon set, could you look into the following? .. > I changed the Windows Only code to match this behavior; however, I don't > have access to a Windows build system so the change is 1) un-tested & > 2) theoret

Re: [Libreoffice] HC Cleanup

On Nov 23, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:18 -0800, Joseph Powers wrote: >> While creating the HC Icon set, could you look into the following? > .. >> I changed the Windows Only code to match this behavior; however, I don't >> have access to a Wi

[Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

Hi *, as Stefan's question on the TDF list didn't get any reply ( http://www.mail-archive.com/disc...@documentfoundation.org/msg02987.html ) I ask here: * What languages does the windows installer contain? * Which ones are included in multi and which ones in all_lang? * Is it correct that hel

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

Christian Lohmaier wrote: > * What languages does the windows installer contain? > * Which ones are included in multi and which ones in all_lang? > Hi Christian, all_lang is built --with-lang=ALL, multi includes the same set as you see for Mac. > * Is it correct that help in both packages is o

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

Hi Christian, On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:29 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > I ask here: > > * What languages does the windows installer contain? > * Which ones are included in multi and which ones in all_lang? Fridrich ? > * Is it correct that help in both packages is only available

Re: [Libreoffice] Discuss&quot;Easy_Hacks: Re move Sheet From File&quot;?

Joe Smith writes: > > Michael Meeks writes: > ... > > So - can you expand on what such a clean way might look like ? > > Yikes! Don't get me started > > ... Ok, I've calmed down a bit. Maybe there's an interim solution that would simply clean up the Insert > Sheet dialog, or make Inse

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

Hi Thorsten, *, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> * What languages does the windows installer contain? >>   * Which ones are included in multi and which ones in all_lang? > > all_lang is built --with-lang=ALL, multi includes the same set as >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Impress

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:55:05 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > PS. really pleased to see the image size decrease in the new theme from > 4.8Mb to 3.3Mb - still lots of low hanging fruit there, with the > duplicate "missing icon" icons, and the res/commandimagelist -> cmd/ > rename to save that space .

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

Hi Michael, *, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:29 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> I ask here: >> >> * What languages does the windows installer contain? >>   * Which ones are included in multi and which ones in all_lang? > >  

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:36:59 +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > Currently the LibO code base is quite liberal wrt copyright statements > and tracing code authors. For example, copyright years and other little > (?) details are way out-of-date. Some projects require script like >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Impress

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 15:57 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > By the way, in agreement with ace_dent, I will remove the classic icon > theme that we ship by default with LO. He said that he maintained it and > is ok with not shipping it. Sounds good to me; it is indeed extremely 'classic'

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for libs-core/svx

Hi Joost, On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 21:59 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > It surprises me that it does not happen oftener, because I see no > coordination between the people working on > RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM. Sorry about that; some level of collision is inevitable with all this scalabl

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] More "easy-hacks" completed

Am i too crazy if i hunt these? ;) Cheers, Timo From 1a14fc7f4638e4f362ed18ac72c86f35483662d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Timo Heino Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:16:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] More 'easy-hacks' completed Removed some commented out code. chart2/source/controller/chartapiwrapper/ c

Re: [Libreoffice] HC Cleanup

Hi Joseph, On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 05:12 -0800, Joseph Powers wrote: > Do you mean something like in: clone/libs-gui/vcl/source/app/settings.cxx Ah ! yes - exactly :-) > ULONG StyleSettings::GetAutoSymbolsStyle() const > { > ... > if( bCont ) > { > if( rDesktopEnviro

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Impress

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:33:08 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Oh - seems reasonable; there is no saving in git repos size by removing > it I suppose. So - you need to checkout: Thanks, I think I'll cope once I find time. > Which is wonderful; that is in now ? perhaps we should back-port

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

Hi Christian, On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 16:07 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > It would be nice to have some point of documentation that lists the > included languages, otherwise people have no chance to tell whether > "multi" (that already is huuuge) is enough, or whether they need the > all varian

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> * Version of the SDK: Why is the version "3.3.0" for Windows, but > >> "315" for all others? > >> > > Gah. My bad. Last minute renaming script gone wrong. > > So 315 is correct or 3.3.0? > 3.3.0 > Ah, So I can take (for beta3 at least) the difference between Mac >

[Libreoffice] [Pushed] More "easy-hacks" completed

Hi Timo, On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:36 +0200, Timo Heino wrote: > Am i too crazy if i hunt these? ;) Not at all :-) no doubt there are some other good things to be doing in the chart code you'll discover on the way. I'm sure we're missing lots of interesting chart types. All the be

Re: [Libreoffice] SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

Hello again, Sorry, forgot something. > 3. Some of the subs & sups seemed to need extra brackets when used with > an operator node (for example int or sum). 4. Matrices with blank elements seem to cause problems so I added more brackets (supposed to be removing them :( ). Also, I've made the code

Re: [Libreoffice] SmNodeToTextVisitor Fixes

> Sorry, forgot something. And of course I forgot to add the attachments :( >From 1313f82a72ca5c361eead3a86d55f3be394514e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Dixon <6b8b4...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:17:23 + Subject: [PATCH] Fix matrices with blank elements. --- starmath/source/v

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:37 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > The question was more targeted with regard to (automatically) creating > > a download page - first iteration > > http://pumbaa.ooodev.org:7780/home/download-and-sub/ - modeled after Oh - cool :-) Wh

Re: [Libreoffice] Tango icon theme leftovers

Hi there, On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:22 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > this is a list of 412 icons that are in the tango theme, but not in the > default_images theme. Some of the are obvious High contrast icons that > can be killed. Right. > But what about others? Should I delete those?

[Libreoffice] Miguel Angel Frias Bonfil invited you to Dropbox

Miguel Angel Frias Bonfil wants you to use Dropbox to sync and share files online and across computers. Get started here: http://www.dropbox.com/link/20.W1-nPKJ7HL/NjQ3ODEzNDczNw?src=referrals_bulk - The Dropbox Team To stop receiving invit

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 02/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components cui options

Hi Wol, Kevin, all, On 2010-11-21 at 23:48 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: > > Forgive what might be a stupid question, but I've seen > > > > String::createFromAscii > > > > Will version 2 find those, and should they be replaced? > > Not a stupid question at all. Regular expressions aren't the most

Re: [Libreoffice] feature/rip-build-repo - branch for removal of the need of the 'build' repo

Hi Norbert, On 2010-11-23 at 01:55 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > I built it on Windows too. The only issue I've encountered is that the > > initial autogen.sh run checks for presence of certain dll files in the > > external module, and it fails because the external module was not there. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal.

On 11/23/2010 09:23 AM, Joachim Trémouroux wrote: > Hi Michael, > I will work on this. I see two possible ways: > Ok Michael, then I will continue within binfilter... ::-)) But a additional question: >From Norbert Thiebaud: > > To be consistent, I rather see them commented out > i.e > > foo(in

Re: [Libreoffice] [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal.

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 21:05 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: > To have a better code, would it not be better to change the prototyping > of the function from foo (int) to foo() ?? Or did I miss a point? It would be better, *but* often these are virtual methods and have to retain their signature

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH 02/12] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM in components cui options

On 23/11/10 19:00, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Wol, Kevin, all, > > On 2010-11-21 at 23:48 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: > >>> Forgive what might be a stupid question, but I've seen >>> >>> String::createFromAscii >>> >>> Will version 2 find those, and should they be replaced? >> Not a stupid question

Re: [Libreoffice] HC Cleanup

Hi Joe I've uploaded the files for the HC theme here:http://people.bath.ac.uk/ea2aced/OOo/svx.zip However, Sebastain has been rocking the HC theme and moving files via Git.Perhaps he could upload the files, or just git copy and rename as required? Cheers,Andrew > From: jpower...@cox.net > Sub

Re: [Libreoffice] Tango icon theme leftovers

Howdy I'm keen to avoid removing any icons until we see if they can be 're-deployed'.Perhaps we can wait until we start migrating to an improved icon theme, based on the freedesktop naming convention?... Currently they are just sitting in Git not hurting anyone... Andrew

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Clean code at writer [source/filter/{ww8, xml}]

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 10:28 -0800, Kayo Hamid wrote: > Sending for review. > Looks mostly good. I held on to a few pieces of commented out code. a) Those where the comments indicated that they might be useful, e.g. my own comment about the theoretical MAN_MACRO subdocument b) Those marked with T

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for components/cui

Hello, Here's a patch for components/cui. I made this : git commit -a git format-patch HEAD~1 Hope it's ok. Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) 0001-RTL-patch-for-cui.patch.bz2 Description: application/bzip ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.free

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for components

Hello, Here's a patch for components Julien. (LGPLv3+ / MPL) 0001-RTL-patch.patch.bz2 Description: application/bzip ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] Fwd: [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal.

oops, forgot to reply-all -- Forwarded message -- From: Norbert Thiebaud Date: 2010/11/23 Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal. To: Pierre-André Jacquod 2010/11/23 Pierre-André Jacquod : > On 11/23/2010 09:23 AM, Joachim Trémou

Re: [Libreoffice] Discuss " Easy_Hacks: Remove Sheet From File" ?

Hi all! Sorry for being a bit later ... yesterday, I had to fight against some electronic devices (what irony...). Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 14:27 -0500 schrieb Kohei Yoshida: > > There should be some data from the Improvement Program on how often > > this item is used, no? > > Sure. But such

[Libreoffice] Building problem, DEBUG_ELEMENT when DEBUG is off

Hi, I had a problem in writerfilter, building without DEBUG. I did some local hack with #undef, to get it building again. #ifdef DEBUG #include namespace writerfilter { namespace dmapper { extern TagLogger::Pointer_t dmapper_logger; } } #else #undef DEBUG_ELEMENT #undef DEBUG_C

Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo

Sophie Gautier wrote: > - the paragraph about changes on BerkeleyDB engine and extensions > database incompatiliby seems strange when speaking about [for > ${PRODUCTNAME} versions prior to 3.2]. May be we should namely > speaks about OpenOffice.org. > Removed completely, LibO uses its own config di

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, DEBUG_ELEMENT when DEBUG is off

Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > I had a problem in writerfilter, building without DEBUG. > Should be fixed on master, please pull latest changes. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgplJkZmzhzbu.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, DEBUG_ELEMENT when DEBUG is off

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:51 +0100, Joost Eekhoorn wrote: > Hi, > I had a problem in writerfilter, building without DEBUG. > > I did some local hack with #undef, to get it building again. [...] I fixed a bug in this area, should be good now thanks, Noel __

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] dead code removal etc from Base

Cheers, Wol >From a06e3e0072e38b6c4fb01e00bc9239236f39e3ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wol Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:33:20 + Subject: [PATCH] Dead code, translations. --- dbaccess/source/ui/misc/DExport.cxx |7 +-- dbaccess/source/ui/misc/HtmlReader.cxx |3 +-

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] dead code, spelling mistakes in Base

Another one... Cheers, Wol >From b8f2f5fe713747a109f5fc26ab7460341aaf0b93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wol Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:41:49 + Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Dead code, spelling mistakes --- .../ui/relationdesign/RTableConnectionData.cxx |6 +--- .../ui/relationdesign/Relation

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Another dead code removal for Base

Cheers, Wol >From a62ec669b4f383a27d645673ae936d073320b1fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wol Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:56:34 + Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Dead code removal --- dbaccess/source/ui/uno/ColumnModel.cxx |2 -- dbaccess/source/ui/uno/copytablewizard.cxx |2 +- 2 files chang

[Libreoffice] Toptan ve perakende Çok hesaplı fiyatlar!

Koç Alışveriş /*--Text Styles--*/ ws6 {font-size: 8px;} ws7 {font-size: 9.3px;} ws8 {font-size: 11px;} ws9 {font-size: 12px;} ws10 {font-size: 13px;} ws11 {font-size: 15px;} ws12 {font-size: 16px;} ws14 {font-size: 19px;} ws16 {font-size: 21px;} ws18 {font-size: 24px;} ws2

Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo

Hi Thorste, *, On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > [...] Thanks for the updates > Latest readme for 3.3 attached for your reference. Many thanks for > the feedback! One point I missed when looking through the links the first time: The mailing list archives will be moved

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] More dead code and spelling mistakes for Base

Cheers, Wol >From c283a346e58711f6d8967d8684eab775cbd3ffd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wol Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:07:16 + Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Dead code and spelling mistakes --- dbaccess/source/ui/browser/brwctrlr.cxx | 36 ++ dbaccess/source/ui/browser/dsEn

Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo

Thanks for giving Libre Office it's very own readme. One thing that popped out at me from the Getting Involved section was this: "familiarize yourself with many of the topics covered since the ${PRODUCTNAME} source code was released back in October 2000. " I dunno if you want OpenOffice for a pro

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] More spelling mistakes and dead code removal for Base

Cheers, Wol >From f50ae7db959563618b0d8288bb7537939c6f2195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wol Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:50:15 + Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Spelling mistakes and dead code --- dbaccess/source/ui/dlg/CollectionView.cxx |1 - dbaccess/source/ui/dlg/ConnectionHelper.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] Windows installer: what languages in multi/all_lang? - SDK: Why different version number?

Hi Michael, *, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:37 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: >> Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> > The question was more targeted with regard to (automatically) creating >> > a download page - first iteration >> > http://pumbaa.oood

Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo

Hi Jon, *; On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:44 AM, John LeMoyne Castle wrote: > [${PRODUCTNAME} source code was released back in October 2000. ] Good catch - While the source is indeed available since 2000, I'm also not sure about whether OpenOffice.org should be explicitly mentioned here... > Tried i

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] try to correct some timers in sc + question

Hi Julien, On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 01:19 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here's a try to correct some timers in scmod.cxx. > Here's what I did and why. > > 1) In IMPL_LINK( ScModule, SpellTimerHdl, Timer*, EMPTYARG ) > I just added aSpellTimer.Stop() when there's neither input from keyboar

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] dead code removal etc from Base

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:36 +, Wols Lists wrote: > Cheers, > Wol Looked good. Pushed. -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreof

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] dead code, spelling mistakes in Base

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:43 +, Wols Lists wrote: > Another one... Pushed. Thanks. -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Another dead code removal for Base

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:57 +, Wols Lists wrote: > Cheers, > Wol Pushed, thanks. -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED, partial] More dead code and spelling mistakes for Base

On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 01:08 +, Wols Lists wrote: > Cheers, > Wol Pushed, except for the hunk that removed the code that checks the format of dropped object. That one looked useful, so I decided to keep it. Thanks! Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] More spelling mistakes and dead code removal for Base

On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 01:52 +, Wols Lists wrote: > Cheers, > Wol Pushed. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Discuss&amp;quot;Easy_Hacks : Remove Sheet From File&amp;quot;?

Joe Smith writes: > ... > If anyone is interested, I can throw out some thoughts, but I'm not enough of > a > UI designer to propose any concrete solution. Actually, after looking closely at the Insert > Sheet dialog, I do have a proposal. I just don't know if it's hard/easy/practical or not.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for components/cui

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:14:03PM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here's a patch for components/cui. > > I made this : > > git commit -a > git format-patch HEAD~1 > > Hope it's ok. > > > Julien. > (LGPLv3+ / MPL) Nice, pushed! D. ___ Libr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for components

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:44:08PM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Hello, > > Here's a patch for components > > Julien. > (LGPLv3+ / MPL) I've removed the line: +m_sURL = rtl::OUString(); , as the member variable is initialized to empty string already, one commented out change and a stray } .

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Digest, Vol 3, Issue 242

Le 24/11/2010 08:11, Julien Nabet a écrit : Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:20:36 -0500 From: Kohei Yoshida Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] try to correct some timers in sc + question To:libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Message-ID:<1290568836.2532.14.ca...@localhost> Content-Type: text/plai

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, DEBUG_ELEMENT when DEBUG is off

Fine that it is fixes, thanks. The build and the install succeeded with my own fix. I just did not like to do another pull, because that takes a lot of time to build. I let my computer build at night. If the build brakes (with running "make"), it will take me another night. If I fix the problems l

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Still cleaning out calc

I'm sorry if i didn't send these in 1 file :( Timo From f6b21adc81beff1cd7dc9c385057c9895d7e3b68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Timo Heino Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:43:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Removed commented out code Signed-off-by: Timo Heino --- .../dialogs/ChartTypeDialogController.

Re: [Libreoffice] Building problem, sc/source/ui/src/optdlg.src gives syntax error

Problem 1: solved. The build did now succeeded. Problem 2: solved. I do always first run: . ./ooenv "./soffice" and "./soffice.bin" now both start writer "./soffice -calc" and "./soffice.bin -calc" both start calc. I really had this ./soffice.bin.bin problem, but it is now solved. Joost 2010/11/

Re: [Libreoffice] timers in calc

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:14:08AM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Le 24/11/2010 08:11, Julien Nabet a écrit : > >Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:20:36 -0500 > >From: Kohei Yoshida > >Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] try to correct some timers in sc + > > question > >To:libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.o