> as well. It was the vim one at the bottom I was interested in. I don't
> think (though I'm open to correction) that emacs reads mode lines unless
> they are the start of the file, so those lines don't do anything.
See
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Specifying-File-Vari
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 22:31 +0200, julien wrote:
> Checking DLL ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/check_libvclplug_kdeli.so
> ...Segmentation fault
> dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libvclplug_kdeli.so'
hmm, so its checkdll that's crashing, not gcc or dl. Doesn't help fix
the problem,
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 01:30 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > as well. It was the vim one at the bottom I was interested in. I don't
> > think (though I'm open to correction) that emacs reads mode lines unless
> > they are the start of the file, so those lines don't do anything.
>
> See
> http://ww
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 08:22 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> LeMoyne wrote:
> > an idea... tmp target path has no-name directory or extra slash (//) marked
> > with *** here:
> >
> > ... LibreOffice/***/gid_Starregistry_Services_Rdb_servicesrdb ...
>
> hmm, I don't know.
> It seems to me rathe
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 00:23 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I merged vosremoval-diagnose.diff, vosremoval-timer.diif and
> voremoval-socket.diff
Cool, and smoketest still passes right :-)
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
Hi Prashant,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 22:36 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
> These are patches to "writer" tree
This is some great work :-) the code starts to look much less
cluttered, thanks for that !
As Norbert says - making the mailing-list look less cluttered by
merging many patch
Hi Rajesh,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 16:48 +0530, rajesh@lisor.org wrote:
> Hi all,
> In order to escape from errors while building oox (with latest
> repo,9th October late night) made some changes to code manually, please
> tell me is it possible to build oox without these changes.As t
Hi Prashant
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 21:21 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
> Do we have any official coding style ? I see a lot of messy code :)
No, there is no coding style yet, but we will start to work on one soon
(step by step).
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfounda
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 09:51 -0700, Kayo Hamid wrote:
> There are other places than writer, base, calc and impress repo? I'm
> not familiar with these many git repositories.
>
All the git repos are in the clone folder.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
> No, there is no coding style yet, but we will start to work on one soon
Well, much (most?) of the existing code, inherited from OpenOffice.org, clearly
uses some amount of consistent style conventions, and when editing such files,
one should, IMHO, follow the style of the surrounding code. Whe
Hi there,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 20:48 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> register component 'vnd.openoffice.pymodule:mailmerge' in registry
> '/tmp/ooopackaging/i_310291286735874/unxlngx6.pro/LibreOffice//gid_Starregistry_Services_Rdb_servicesrdb/en-US_it_fr_pt-BR_inprogress_1/services.rdb'
>
>
Hi Rajesh,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 15:03 +0530, Rajesh Sola wrote:
> Could some one tell me availability of SDK for LibreOffice at present
> or in near future to develop extensions, or is it managible with
> existing OOo SDK only? In cloned git repo sdk dir is there but is not
> part of build sequen
Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 08:22 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
...
There seems to be a problem with the installer on e.g. Ubuntu for python
components. As a hackaround adding --with-system-python to
the ./autogen.sh line might work. I'm not seeing the problem on e.g.
Fedora
Hi Julien,
So - again this might go well in a bug; this is the 2nd time I've seen
this, and I can't recall the resolution previously.
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 22:31 +0200, julien wrote:
> > do i need to add the option with-distro or can i keep on to build like
> > this, without with-distro
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:08 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> /home/serval/libreoffice-source/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh
I added valgrind instead of gdb, and on openSUSE it is (surprisingly)
completely valgrind clean as well, which is odd.
Looking forward
Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi there,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 20:48 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
register component 'vnd.openoffice.pymodule:mailmerge' in registry
'/tmp/ooopackaging/i_310291286735874/unxlngx6.pro/LibreOffice//gid_Starregistry_Services_Rdb_servicesrdb/en-US_it_fr_pt-BR_inprogress_1/s
Hi Ruben,
Thanks for hacking LibreOffice and thanks for the patch, it's mostly
committed,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 13:10 +0200, Rubén Jáñez wrote:
> This patch removes bogus comments found in Base.
just be careful of removing any comment that reference openoffice
issuezilla bugs ( there is useful co
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Noel Power wrote:
> Hi Ruben,
>
> Thanks for hacking LibreOffice and thanks for the patch, it's mostly
> committed,
> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 13:10 +0200, Rubén Jáñez wrote:
>> This patch removes bogus comments found in Base.
> just be careful of removing any comment
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:41 +0300, Aurimas Fiڑeras wrote:
> Simply fixes some annoying typos in documentation including OO bug #112563.
>
> Patch is contributed under the LGPLv3+.
Thanks!!! & pushed
(
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/ure/commit/?id=317545b04b16474b0fb959fc0d38e25465e25748
Hi all
Le 11/10/2010 12:04, Noel Power a écrit :
> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:41 +0300, Aurimas Fiڑeras wrote:
>> Simply fixes some annoying typos in documentation including OO bug #112563.
>>
>> Patch is contributed under the LGPLv3+.
> Thanks!!! & pushed
just for understanding the process when pa
Hi Alan
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 15:29 -0700, Alan Du wrote:
> I've deleted some pointless comments in two files here. The git diff
> is attached
> Contributed under LGPLv3+
Thanks for the patch but what is the full path to the files the patch is
addressing?, for the life of me I can't find any module
Hi Laurent,
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:08 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Le 11/10/2010 12:04, Noel Power a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 17:41 +0300, Aurimas Fi*eras wrote:
> >> Simply fixes some annoying typos in documentation including OO bug #112563.
> >>
> >> Patch is contributed
Hi Alan, Noel,
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 04:13 -0600, Noel Power wrote:
> Hi Alan
> On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 15:29 -0700, Alan Du wrote:
> > I've deleted some pointless comments in two files here. The git diff
> > is attached
> > Contributed under LGPLv3+
> Thanks for the patch but what is the full path
Hi Noel
Agree. may be political issues filling things in ooo issuezilla
(and you know, politicians ...)
but, more than showing that things are solved by LO to all the world,
the idea is to track what LO solved to avoid duplication of efforts for
LO developpers (especially new commers)
discussing
Donald Johnson wrote:
> The README file in en-US/readmes from the 3.3.0 64-bit download is a tad
> annoying. First, there's no line wrap to 80 col (good for terminals).
> Second,
> smart quotes are in the file, which appear badly on a terminal and many text
> editors. Attached are three patches
On 2010-10-10, Constantin Makshin wrote:
> LibreOffice installation package contains several extensions, some of which
> depend on JRE and therefore cause loading errors on systems where Java is not
> available.
> I think it'd be nice to allow the user choose what extensions [s]he wants to
> ins
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Aha, what it boils down to, right, is that the emacs mode lines in that
> sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8atr.cxx and friends won't be used by emacs
> seeing as its neither pattern.
>
So let's remove them - added to the list of EasyHack topics.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgp8jCrt0GLq
HI
experiencing the same error
>
>>> ... LibreOffice/***/gid_Starregistry_Services_Rdb_servicesrdb ...
>>
here is some detail
http://libreoffice.pastebin.com/zRVRZEx8
>
> There seems to be a problem with the installer on e.g. Ubuntu for python
I confirm i'm under ubuntu Lucid
> components. A
some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> Howdy. I was asked to post a message here to kick off a discussion of
> test script coordination. I'm volunteering to help with them because a)
> it's simple, and b) I'm simple.
>
> I know shell, as you can see from the add-modelines script I just
> submitted, an
Noel Power wrote:
> > who should update
> > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
> > but, should it be updated ?
> This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
> different situation ) Unfortunately I don't have the answer. As I see it
> issuezilla is Oracle
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > No, there is no coding style yet, but we will start to work on
> > one soon
>
> Well, much (most?) of the existing code, inherited from
> OpenOffice.org, clearly uses some amount of consistent style
> conventions, and when editing such files, one should, IMHO, follow
> the
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:44 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Noel Power wrote:
> > > who should update
> > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
> > > but, should it be updated ?
> > This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
> > different situation ) Un
Noel Power wrote:
> > who should update
> > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
> > but, should it be updated ?
> This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
> different situation ) Unfortunately I don't have the answer. As I see it
> issuezilla is Oracle
On 2010-10-11, Noel Power wrote:
> This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
> different situation ) Unfortunately I don't have the answer. As I see it
> issuezilla is Oracles bug reporting infrastructure ( and not the
> communities ) Also updating the issue to say it is f
Kayo Hamid wrote:
> I'm sending this patch for review because i do not know if these changes are
> ok.
> The patch covers variables assigned but not used and scope of variables
> inside if/else/loops.
> revol_
>
Hi revol_,
hm, that patch breaks building dbaccess in several ways - at least
pDesc
Hi Jesse,
On 2010-10-09 at 14:02 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> Freenode IRC bot for queries?
IIRC Christian has an IRC bot for IssueZilla, the OpenOffice.org
bugtracker, maybe you can help him to extend it for the freedesktop.org
queries too?
Christian - anything Jesse can you help
Hi Jesse, Petr, all,
On 2010-10-11 at 14:33 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > Howdy. I was asked to post a message here to kick off a discussion of
> > test script coordination. I'm volunteering to help with them because a)
> > it's simple, and b) I'm simple.
> >
> > I know shell, as you can se
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 04:22 -0600, Noel Power wrote:
> This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
> different situation ) Unfortunately I don't have the answer. As I see it
> issuezilla is Oracles bug reporting infrastructure ( and not the
> communities ) Also updating the
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:58 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> I guess a comment with. "fixed in LibreOffice commit:
> "
>
> should not be perceived as a dirty trick. Rather it points OOo
> developers to a possible solution that they can use for inspiration of
> how to fix a bug.
I am just interest
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 15:38 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 16:29 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > I'll need to setup and maybe enhance the bug numbers extraction
> > script... Don't hesitate to report / fix any trouble with it.
>
> I've been in the habit, because it was th
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 15:09 +0200, Arnaud VERSINI wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is the full patch
Thanks! This time it builds fine, and the change looks reasonable.
Cedric also confirmed that your patch looks good, so we are all set. :-)
If you have any other patches in your queue, feel free to bug us.
I've applied some lossless compression to the PNGs in the package to reduce
the size of the files a bit, some by as much as 50%
In the grand scheme of things I know it's not life or death, but every
little bit helps, right?
This is contributed under the LGPLv3+
~Patrick Hawks
p...@pathawks.com
Hi there,
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 20:41 -0700, LeMoyne wrote:
> I just got started with OpenOffice this week and struggled with their install
> (it hung twice -2d time at end so OO worked). Did a lot of learning with
> MRI and got a little OO Basic code to ~work. Found LibreOffice and easily
> cho
Hi,
again a brief summary of what happened the 2nd week on LibreOffice
repos:
bugfixes-week-40.txt all commits that reference a proper bug
id (from a variety of trackers - #i... referring to the OpenOffice
issuezilla, fdo# to freedesktop, rhbz# to RedHat bugzilla etc)
commit-log-week-40.txt list
Hi Pat,
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:20 -0500, Pat Hawks wrote:
> I've applied some lossless compression to the PNGs in the package to
> reduce the size of the files a bit, some by as much as 50%
Worth doing :-)
> In the grand scheme of things I know it's not life or death, but every
> litt
This patch removes bogus comments found in the dochdl directory
including empty Beschreibung (translation: description) statements
Signed-off-by: Prashant Shah
---
sw/source/ui/dochdl/gloshdl.cxx | 62 ++-
sw/source/ui/dochdl/selglos.cxx |2 -
sw/source/ui/dochdl/swd
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Prashant Shah wrote:
>
> This patch removes bogus comments found in the uiview directory
> including bigus statments in germany like :
typo : It should be bogus not bigus
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.fr
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:20:31AM -0500, Pat Hawks wrote:
>I've applied some lossless compression to the PNGs in the package to
>reduce the size of the files a bit, some by as much as 50%
What is the command line?
>This�is contributed under the LGPLv3+
Patch doesn't work for bi
for some reason this never seemed to make it to the list :-( ( I did
mail it from another account but should have had the same details :/ )
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 20:41 -0700, LeMoyne wrote:
> I could not find a way to import the code as Basic code. I also was unable
> to klud
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 20:41 -0700, LeMoyne wrote:
> I could not find a way to import the code as Basic code. I also was unable
> to kludge in the code with file copying. The remaining workaround was to
> re-build my code by cut and paste from the old code (*.xba) stored in
> C:\Users\\AppData\Roa
Hi Caolan,
On 2010-10-08 at 14:18 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Nevertheless, there was agreement on the IRC that we will allow feature
> > branches even in the main repos; but in that case, they have to be
> > prefixed with 'feature/' prefix. Also, the creator of the branch is
> > supposed
i'm trying to build libreoffice, at windows, but i do not known what i need.
i'm following this page,
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows,
and I have in my files the build, base, impress, writer and calc repos. cygwin
+ dependencies, perl +
Hi,
the attached patch change the default name of downloadable packages,
e.g. the one is used should a correct product name missing.
See solenv/bin/modules/installer/download.pm file for details, in
bootstrap repository.
Patch released according to LGPLv3+ license.
beppec56
--
Kind Regard
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:47 +0200, "Thorsten Behrens"
wrote:
> Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Aha, what it boils down to, right, is that the emacs mode lines in that
> > sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8atr.cxx and friends won't be used by emacs
> > seeing as its neither pattern.
> >
> So let's remove them - ad
Le 10/10/2010 22:31, julien a écrit :
Le 10/10/2010 16:33, julien a écrit :
Hi,
I've just done these steps :
make clean
git pull -r
bni/g pull -r
./autogen.sh --with-git (i removed --disable-kde --disable-kde4 just
to test if kde parts are ok, of course i installed kdelibs4-dev
./download
ma
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Prashant Shah wrote:
>
> This patch removes bogus comments found in the dochdl directory
> including empty Beschreibung (translation: description) statements
Pushed. Thanks,
Norbert
>
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Shah
> ---
> sw/source/ui/dochdl/gloshdl.cxx |
Pushed.
That's a much more practical patch size for these kinds of change,
ant kudo for the attachment, they came back with a useful name.
Keep them comming.
Thanks,
Norbert
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Prashant Shah wrote:
>
> This patch removes bogus comments found in the dbui director
Hi folks,
FYI, I'm working on adding a new options page in the Options dialog
(LibreOffice Calc - Compatibility) in order to provide different sets of
key bindings - "OpenOffice.org legacy" and the "Default". This is
motivated by the fact that LibreOffice's default key bindings
("Default") slight
Canadian Health&Care http://yonnefhou.com/
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 16:16 -0700, Alan Du wrote:
> Sorry about my last whacked email. I've removed a lot of
> the //CHINA001 comments with these.
>
> The filename is the directory the changes were made in.
Hey Alan,
Thanks for your patch submission. I've pushed most of it except for the
write
Hi,
Mechtilde thankfully reported a problem with old OOo 2.x user
installations, which get migrated over to LibreOffice automatically
- problem is, the OOo code we inherit here has several bugs.
So we talked a bit on IRC tonight, and we somehow figured it would
be a good idea to keep migrating ba
Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
acquainted with the build and with git...
This is quite fresh in my mind... since I've learn that in the past
few days. But I may be wrong, so a reviewed by more senior
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:43 -0500, "Norbert Thiebaud"
wrote:
> Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
>
> So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
> acquainted with the build and with git...
>
> This is quite fresh in my mind... since I've learn tha
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:10 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:43 -0500, "Norbert Thiebaud"
> wrote:
> > Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
> >
> > So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
> > acquainted with the bui
I'm building for the Mac and the vos:: removal patch didn't include the mac
files.
I found three files that have issues:
vcl/aqua/inc/salinst.h
vcl/aqua/source/app/salinst.cxx
vcl/aqua/source/gdi/salgdi.cxx
A patch would be nice; however, suggestions on how to patch are a
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:08:31PM +0200, julien wrote:
> Le 10/10/2010 22:31, julien a écrit :
> I changed the line :
>
> $checkdll "$@"
> by
> gdb $checkdll "$@"
>
There is the problem: this line should be
gdb --args $checkdll "$@"
D.
___
LibreOffi
66 matches
Mail list logo
