Re: unusedcode some step further

2013-04-22 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Tuesday 02 of April 2013, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 16:04 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > > Another way is to use a clang plugin to generate a more accurate list > > of definitions and call sites. > > That's what I would do, because clang would handle all of the macro > > and lan

Re: unusedcode some step further

2013-04-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 16:04 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote: > Another way is to use a clang plugin to generate a more accurate list > of definitions and call sites. > That's what I would do, because clang would handle all of the macro > and language parsing. Completely agreed; I imagine it wo

Re: unusedcode some step further

2013-04-01 Thread Noel Grandin
Another way is to use a clang plugin to generate a more accurate list of definitions and call sites. That's what I would do, because clang would handle all of the macro and language parsing. On Monday, 1 April 2013, Thomas Arnhold wrote: > Hi, > > there are several unused methods in the source wh

unusedcode some step further

2013-04-01 Thread Thomas Arnhold
Hi, there are several unused methods in the source which callcatcher doesn't catch. Two examples: 08b91c63131b7e625d2a2c489bc537dafe5c5963 and c12ab867f282e783507fcf74ab5c90e784681f65 which had only (virtual) definitions, but no calls. The same applies to inlines like 646daee253b69404591c00