Re: tail_build fail on missing includes

2012-08-23 Thread Matúš Kukan
On 23 August 2012 23:48, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > 2012/8/23 Matúš Kukan : >> exactly, I was never sure I've done it right, but it seemed to be >> working so far. >> >> Matus > > Well to be honest I never had issue with it before the 3.6 release, > but seems that with certain use options it became un

Re: tail_build fail on missing includes

2012-08-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/8/23 Matúš Kukan : > exactly, I was never sure I've done it right, but it seemed to be > working so far. > > Matus Well to be honest I never had issue with it before the 3.6 release, but seems that with certain use options it became unstable. Should I disable it as whole (always experimental

Re: tail_build fail on missing includes

2012-08-23 Thread Matúš Kukan
On 23 August 2012 22:54, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> Well, it should work like this (simplifying): I mean really simplifying.. or ignoring details.. so it also may become untrue. >> avmedia links against (and depends on) sfx and sfx depends on sfx2_inc >> package. > > on face value that would no

Re: tail_build fail on missing includes

2012-08-23 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > Hi Tomáš, > > On 23 August 2012 20:38, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> I am not exactly sure why the deps are not picked by >> gbuild but when I fiddled with it and added the direct dep over >> sfx2_inc the code built bit further and again it died on

Re: tail_build fail on missing includes

2012-08-23 Thread Matúš Kukan
Hi Tomáš, On 23 August 2012 20:38, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > I am not exactly sure why the deps are not picked by > gbuild but when I fiddled with it and added the direct dep over > sfx2_inc the code built bit further and again it died on missing > svtools_inc. When that worked it proceeded to anoth

Re: tail_build fail on missing includes

2012-08-23 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > So for now I have no clue how to fix it and I would really welcome any > help for it because this could rate as most annoying bug for Gentoo as > 1/3rd of users are hit by this stuff... I have it reproducing machine > at work so anyone from