On Tuesday 23 of September 2014, Michael Meeks wrote:
> The question is; what should we replace it with. Personally I'm more of
> a fan of intrusive reference counting for VCL - we don't want lots of
> atomics, so that the optimizer can rid us of size inefficiency - and at
> least for now we
Oh, I just saw this email.
I recently posted a gerrit change for review around FontCharMap, you can
find it here:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/11565/
I've never looked at what Reference actually does, but now that I do it
seems that it relies on a class that exposes an acquire() and releas
Hi Noel,
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 14:52 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Otherwise we should just standardise on boost::intrusive_ptr and remove SvRef.
Yep - my concern is only that boost::intrusive_ptr< Window > - is some
horribly long horror =) and that having some semi-standard means of
havin
On 2014-09-23 02:40 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
The question is; what should we replace it with. Personally I'm more of a fan of intrusive reference counting for VCL
- we don't want lots of atomics, so that the optimizer can rid us of size inefficiency - and at least for now we can't
ref-count thos
Hi Noel,
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 10:01 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> I ran my clang plugin over master last night. This is the output.
Awesome - I've up-loaded a log here:
http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/non-heap-windows.txt
> so there is a fair amount of work involved :-)
H
Hi
I ran my clang plugin over master last night. This is the output.
There is lots of duplication in the warnings, so running:
$ grep "not heap allocated" stack-alloc.txt | sort -u | wc -l
gives
569
fields that need to be changed.
so there is a fair amount of work involved :-)
But looking
