Re: [slightly OT] Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-06 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Italo, On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 00:28 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote: > More than pictures of old products, I look for old pictures of people > who show that TDF project members were there before - or at the same > time - of Apache OO members, or paraphernalia like Caolan's paper. Hum... Would the Wr

Re: [slightly OT] Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread Italo Vignoli
Christoph Noack wrote: >>> I have an idea to leverage the document for a LibreOffice Story which >>> connects 1998 to 2012, and introduces LibreOffice 3.6. It would be nice >>> to find some other LO paraphernalia, from the early conferences. I have >>> something in my archive, but others might hav

[slightly OT] Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Thorsten, all! Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2012, 19:42 +0200 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: > Italo Vignoli wrote: > > I have an idea to leverage the document for a LibreOffice Story which > > connects 1998 to 2012, and introduces LibreOffice 3.6. It would be nice > > to find some other LO paraphernali

Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Italo Vignoli wrote: > I have an idea to leverage the document for a LibreOffice Story which > connects 1998 to 2012, and introduces LibreOffice 3.6. It would be nice > to find some other LO paraphernalia, from the early conferences. I have > something in my archive, but others might have additiona

Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread Italo Vignoli
Michael Meeks wrote: > Fun ! :-) We just need some artist to turn them into something > beautiful and electronic I guess. I have an idea to leverage the document for a LibreOffice Story which connects 1998 to 2012, and introduces LibreOffice 3.6. It would be nice to find some other LO parap

Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread Philipp Riemer
2012/7/5 David Tardon : > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 21:59 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> > So, I found some old class diagrams for writer which I think I got from >> > khz who I think got them from jp. They're drawn on some printout

Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread Michael Meeks
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 12:27 +0200, Philipp Riemer wrote: > I am currently working on a simple DOT representation... Seams to be > trickier than expected. > > What would be in your eyes the best kind of visualization? Classical > UML class diagrams? That's totally unclear to me ;-) I'm no

Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread David Tardon
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 21:59 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > So, I found some old class diagrams for writer which I think I got from > > khz who I think got them from jp. They're drawn on some printouts which > > have a 1998 date

Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread Philipp Riemer
I am currently working on a simple DOT representation... Seams to be trickier than expected. What would be in your eyes the best kind of visualization? Classical UML class diagrams? -- Philipp 2012/7/5 Michael Meeks : > > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 21:59 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> So, I found s

Re: rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-05 Thread Michael Meeks
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 21:59 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > So, I found some old class diagrams for writer which I think I got from > khz who I think got them from jp. They're drawn on some printouts which > have a 1998 date on them. Coffee ring around SwClient is probably not > significant. http:

rediscovered: missing writer documentation

2012-07-04 Thread Caolán McNamara
So, I found some old class diagrams for writer which I think I got from khz who I think got them from jp. They're drawn on some printouts which have a 1998 date on them. Coffee ring around SwClient is probably not significant. http://blogs.linux.ie/caolan/files/2012/07/writer.pdf C. _