On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 12:36 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> No issue with pootle, but pocheck needs to be taught to deal with it.
Ah, https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/62637/ conflicted because this
is already dealt with :-)
___
LibreOffice mailing
Hi *,
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 5:09 PM Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> I was asked in
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83128 about
> supporting ngettext-alike plural forms.
>
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/61426/ is my proposal on that.
> […]
> caolanm->cloph: would this work
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:57:20PM +, Kaganski Mike wrote:
> On 10/5/2018 6:09 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > To current NC_(context, string) we add NNC_(context, singular, plural)
> > when declaring the strings for translation
>
> How does it play with other languages, where we might have mor
On 10/5/2018 6:09 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> To current NC_(context, string) we add NNC_(context, singular, plural)
> when declaring the strings for translation
How does it play with other languages, where we might have more complex
rules? E.g., in Russian, a "singular" form might be used for a
I was asked in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83128 about
supporting ngettext-alike plural forms.
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/61426/ is my proposal on that.
To current Translate::get(id) we add Translate::nget(id, cardinality)
when requesting the translation.
To curr
