Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-12-04 Thread Markus Mohrhard
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:50:25PM +, tino wrote: > > > I've also got an example/test spreadsheet, but didn't quite know where > > > to put it. > > > > The right solution is to extend the existing function (import) tests in > > sc/qa/unit/subsequent_filters-test.cxx with the test file being in

Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-12-04 Thread tino
> > I've also got an example/test spreadsheet, but didn't quite know where > > to put it. > > The right solution is to extend the existing function (import) tests in > sc/qa/unit/subsequent_filters-test.cxx with the test file being in > sc/qa/unit/data/ods/functions.ods Ok, this is something I'll

Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-12-03 Thread Markus Mohrhard
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:37:55PM +, tino wrote: > > I've also got an example/test spreadsheet, but didn't quite know where > to put it. > The right solution is to extend the existing function (import) tests in sc/qa/unit/subsequent_filters-test.cxx with the test file being in sc/qa/unit/da

Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-12-03 Thread tino
> > but I must be missing something? > > you are missing the wonder that is scp2 :-/ > > that is the thing which defines which files end up where in the > installation; if you don't add it there it won't be installed. Haha, brilliant thanks, that helped a lot! I've submitted my changes via gerr

Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-11-30 Thread Michael Stahl
On 30/11/12 00:44, tino wrote: > This UNO add-in thing turns out a bit too complex for me. I've managed > as far as getting a libpricinglo.so compiled but "make install" > doesn't copy it into destination. Also there's no entry of the new > add-in in services.rdb, which I think is needed. I've alre

Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-11-29 Thread tino
This UNO add-in thing turns out a bit too complex for me. I've managed as far as getting a libpricinglo.so compiled but "make install" doesn't copy it into destination. Also there's no entry of the new add-in in services.rdb, which I think is needed. I've already modified Repository.mk scaddins/*.

Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-11-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi tino, On Thursday, 2012-11-29 18:32:26 +, tino wrote: > > I suggest to open a new directory under scaddins/source, e.g. > > scaddins/source/pricing (or scaddins/source/financial if you plan to add > > other functionality than pricing) and create a new Add-In, for a simple > > approach how

Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-11-29 Thread tino
> I suggest to open a new directory under scaddins/source, e.g. > scaddins/source/pricing (or scaddins/source/financial if you plan to add > other functionality than pricing) and create a new Add-In, for a simple > approach how to create an Add-In see scaddins/source/datefunc Ok, will do. I've alr

Re: opinions on additional calc functions

2012-11-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi tino, On Wednesday, 2012-11-28 11:45:50 +, tino wrote: > I'm new to libreoffice dev and I'm working on implementing some > additional financial (option pricing) functions for calc. So far I've > used > > ./core/scaddins/source/analysis/ > > locally to add my functions but I've been told

opinions on additional calc functions

2012-11-28 Thread tino
Hi, I'm new to libreoffice dev and I'm working on implementing some additional financial (option pricing) functions for calc. So far I've used ./core/scaddins/source/analysis/ locally to add my functions but I've been told scaddins is mainly for ms excel functions and ./core/sc/ is certainly no